Action Observation for Neurorehabilitation in Apraxia – Frontiers

Introduction

Apraxia encompasses a broad spectrum of higher-order purposeful motion problems (1) and is most frequently related to neurological harm to left-hemisphere (2). The accepted definition of apraxia contains deficits in performing, imitating, and recognizing expert actions concerned within the intentional actions, colloquially known as gestures (3). Pathological situations similar to apraxia consequence from an lack of ability to evince the idea of particular actions (4) or to execute associated motor packages (5). Classically, apraxia is identified when a affected person presents with an lack of ability to execute gestures in response to verbal instructions or imitate with completely different effectors (mouth, hand, or foot) (4), together with actions involving the non-paretic limb ipsilateral to the lesion[s]. Though apraxia primarily impacts motor actions, research report that greater impairment ranges could also be associated to visuo-motor integration (6). Current proof helps the notion that apraxia influences expert acts within the atmosphere, interferes with impartial functioning, impedes each day actions, and impacts the efficiency of routine self-care (7, 8); that’s, individuals might have problem brushing their enamel (9), consuming (7), making ready meals (10), and getting dressed (11). As a consequence, sufferers with apraxia can develop extreme nervousness and reductions within the spontaneous use of social gestures (12), resulting in isolation and despair (13) and consequent delays in returning to work (14).

Virtually 50% of sufferers with left-hemispheric stroke (15) and ~35% of sufferers with Alzheimer’s illness and corticobasal degeneration (16–18) develop apraxia that persists after sickness onset and impacts purposeful talents. Analysis to help within the growth and optimization of apraxia neurorehabilitation is essential. A number of approaches for the therapy of apraxia deficits are at present in apply [for a review see (19, 20)], together with verbal (21) or pictorial (22) facilitation and using bodily cues primarily based on repetitive behavioral-training packages with gesture-production workout routines. The errorless completion methodology represents one other current method (23). Autonomy in actions of each day residing tends to be underestimated (24), and rehabilitation research stay restricted as a result of nature of disturbances to automated/voluntary dissociations (i.e., a capability to execute actions solely in pure settings). Thus far, no rehabilitation therapy or therapeutic potentialities primarily based main on motion statement has been studied in apraxia.

The Worth of Motion Remark in Treating Apraxia

Language problems amongst sufferers with apraxia who are suffering from concomitant aphasia counsel that defects in gesture imitation, quite than gestures in response to verbal instructions, are extra delicate indicators of apraxia (25). Goldenberg has proposed that imitation apraxia could possibly be primarily thought of a deficit of perceptual evaluation (26). Proof from a number of research signifies that perceptual and motor codes are carefully related (27, 28) and that sufferers with apraxia could also be faulty each in performing motor acts and within the perceptual code essential to symbolize the suitable gesture. Sunderland and Sluman have proven, for instance, that issues orienting a spoon in a bean-spooning job counsel an lack of ability to recollect the proper motion and to guage the correctness of the perceived motion (29).

Though apraxia is often thought of a motor impairment, deficits in intact gestural notion usually are not unusual, occurring in 33% of 1 pattern (30). Such sufferers, who exhibit deficits within the execution of actions, additionally commit errors when judging between accurately and incorrectly carried out acts (30–32), understanding the that means of pantomimes (33, 34), discriminating amongst action-related sounds (35, 36), matching pictures of gestures (26), participating visuo-motor temporal integration (6), and predicting incoming noticed actions (37, 38).

Motion-execution results in apraxia thus usually are not purely motor processes and visible representations of given actions might affect the actions’ execution by visuo-motor switch (39). The integrity of gesture representations has essential implications for rehabilitation methods (40). The spatial and temporal use of a physique half for the planning of a tool-related motion and the imitation of others’ actions contain an inherent perceptual part, which will be disturbed following apraxia onset. Consequently, trendy assessments of apraxia embrace evaluations of gesture understanding (32, 41).

Visible-Motor Methods within the Rehabilitation of Sufferers With Limb Apraxia

The notion of frequent representations for each executed and noticed actions is of appreciable curiosity within the utilized discipline of stroke neurorehabilitation (42, 43). Regardless of using state-of-the-art apraxia-evaluation batteries (44) to discover perceptual deficits within the understanding of actions in sufferers with apraxia, few research have proposed new rehabilitation packages that embrace components of each statement and execution of actions.

Smania et al.’s (45) scientific examinations of 43 left brain-damaged sufferers with apraxia revealed faulty performances in gesture execution and imitation, in addition to within the recognition and identification of transitive and intransitive gestures. For his or her examine, roughly half of the sufferers obtained coaching in ecological motion manufacturing and comprehension; the opposite half underwent typical language rehabilitation for a similar variety of therapy hours. The coaching, which mixed the statement and execution of noticed actions, consisted of three progressive phases, every characterised by rising levels of problem, obtained by phased reductions of facilitation cues as efficiency improved. After ~30 classes, therapists recorded important enhancements: roughly 50% enchancment within the ADL scale and a median of 40% within the praxis take a look at (22). When solely contemplating apraxia sufferers with cortical lesions primarily within the fronto-parietal community, the advance was even higher (45). No important efficiency modifications have been noticed within the consequence measures of management sufferers who didn’t bear particular packages of gesture manufacturing/statement workout routines. Curiously, authors reported a major enchancment in gesture recognition efficiency after the apraxia therapy, and a correlation was discovered between gesture comprehension exams and the ADL questionnaire (ADL-gesture comprehension: R = 0.37, p = 0.034) (22). These outcomes counsel that the optimistic results of this rehabilitative method in apraxia require parity within the therapy of each the motor and the perceptual elements of motion processing (45). Of be aware, useful results continued for at the very least 2 months and prolonged to the each day residing actions even of untreated actions, serving to sufferers attain purposeful independence from their caregivers (22).

Goldenberg and Hagmann (9) developed a very profitable restorative methodology during which coaching comprised two completely different strategies. The primary aimed toward serving to sufferers to be taught and accurately execute full actions, with therapists offering completely different help in any respect scientific steps (e.g., by demonstrating gesture execution and asking sufferers to mimic them), and lowering the help solely when sufferers have been capable of carry out these steps on their very own. The second aimed toward directing sufferers’ consideration to the purposeful that means of objects’ particular person options and particulars, essential for varied actions. This two-step process ensured a double reinforcement of the motion’s perceptual-motor code: the primary on-line throughout the simultaneity of the demonstration and the second off-line as a delayed imitation. The mixture of those two strategies led to important enhancements in educated ADL, however just about no generalization of coaching results was noticed between educated and non-trained actions. The remedy’s success was preserved amongst these sufferers who carried out the actions at house however not amongst those that didn’t. In a subsequent examine (46), the authors developed a barely completely different variant to earlier approaches during which sufferers carried out whole actions with a minimal of errors. On this method, the purposeful commonalities between completely different objects have been emphasised by offering verbal directions and visible and gestural help. Results of those therapies lasted as much as 3 months after the therapy ended.

Compensatory therapy point out that the sufferers confirmed giant enhancements in ADL functioning after rehabilitative packages aiming at educating visible methods to beat the apraxic impairments throughout execution of on a regular basis actions (47). Sufferers have been taught methods to compensate internally (e.g., self-verbalization or creativeness) or externally (e.g., statement of pictorial cues) the distinct phases of a fancy motion, whereas performing the each day actions (47–50).

All described interventions included components of visuo-motor integration and appeared to point that motor and visible relearning in these sufferers was inextricably intertwined (see Desk 1).

Desk 1. Apraxia intervention research.

Perceptual method has been efficiently utilized to a unique rehabilitative intervention exhibiting how motion statement has a optimistic impact on the efficiency of a particular motor talent [for a review see (41, 52, 53)]. Sufferers watch a particular motor act offered in a video clip or in an actual demonstration, and concurrently (or thereafter) carried out the identical motion. A match (or mismatch) between visible alerts and the gesture carried out drive re-learning about how the limb ought to transfer with a view to carry out the motor act precisely (see Determine 1 for a hypothetical mannequin on apraxia). Appropriately reproducing temporal (56, 57), spatial (58), and physique coding (59) helps characterize actions, facilitate the motor patterns that sufferers should execute, and stimulate a speedy on-line correction of motion (58, 60, 61). Remark mixed with bodily apply in a congruent mode results in elevated motor cortex excitability, and synaptic and cortical map plasticity strengthens the reminiscence hint of the motor act (62). In a different way, rehabilitative coaching primarily based on bodily apply alone (300–1,000 each day repetitions) elicits solely minimal neural reorganization (63). This mixed visual-motor remedy has been proven to enhance motor efficiency in sufferers that suffered a persistent stroke (64–86), sufferers with Parkinson’s illness (87–92), youngsters with cerebral palsy (93–97) and aged people with decreased cognitive talents (98). Electrophysiological research have additionally reported optimistic results of motion statement on the restoration of motor capabilities after acute and persistent stroke (71, 99). This non-invasive, cheap, user-friendly method works extra shortly on organic effectors (mouth, limbs, and trunk), selling higher and sooner restoration.

www.frontiersin.org

Determine 1. Hypothetical mannequin for performing and recognizing a transitive motion [adapted from (54) and (55)]. Failures in performing or recognizing gestures might happen due to harm at any stage within the directional circulate between perceiving (enter) and performing (output) the motion. The statement of a video clip or an actual demonstration of motion can have a optimistic impact on the choice and retrieval of the proper motion. In determine the instance of greedy a cup of espresso. After the proper visible identification of the article as a cup, sufferers with apraxia have a troublesome retrieval of the proper motion related to that object. When an incorrect motion is carried out, a discrepancy happens between the (right) motion noticed on the mannequin and the notion of personal (incorrect) carried out gesture. Combining motor coaching and motion statement might improve the relearning of each day actions and strengthen the visuo-motor coupling.

A Neural Substrate for Motion Remark and Execution in Apraxia Rehabilitation

The inextricable hyperlink between motion notion and execution was first posited within the ideomotor concept, which has been validated by delineation of the mind community, referred to as the mirror neuron system (MNS). Impressed by single-cell (“mirror neuron”) recordings in monkeys (100, 101), many neuroimaging and neurophysiological research have advised that the grownup human mind is provided with neural methods and mechanisms that symbolize each the visible notion and execution of actions in a standard format (102). Motion deficits among the many sufferers with apraxia could also be described at a number of ranges. Whereas these ranges partially overlap, 4 ranges of hierarchical modeling at which an MNS mechanism can help an noticed motion (42, 103) are as follows:

(i) kinematic: Sufferers with apraxia steadily current with abnormalities in kinematic actions within the type of motor patterns which can be slower, shorter, and fewer vertical than these of people with out apraxia (104);

(ii) motor: Limb apraxia interferes with the choice and management of the hand-muscle exercise (105). Furthermore, it interferes with the formation of applicable hand configurations for utilizing objects (106);

(iii) purpose: Understanding the quick objective of an motion is impeded; for instance, sufferers with apraxia are impaired entry to psychological illustration of software use (33);

(iv) intention: Sufferers current with an altered skill to observe the early planning phases of their very own actions (107).

The cortical areas have been proven to include mirror neurons which can be typically described as part of an built-in sensorimotor info system underpinned by neural exercise within the frontal (103), parietal (108), and superior temporal sulcus areas. This technique known as the motion statement community (AON) (109). In people, these cortical areas mediate the statement of actions that type part of the observer’s motor repertoire (41). Additionally they contribute to the imitation (110) and comprehension (111) of those actions, and are concerned in talent acquisition (112). Lesion symptom mapping research have reported gestural deficits in sufferers with apraxia, that are most steadily obvious following lesions within the inferior frontal lobe (30, 113–116), and in supramarginal and angular gyrus (37, 113, 115, 117) of the left hemisphere. Nonetheless, apraxia has additionally been noticed in sufferers with harm in posterior center temporal lobe, anterior temporal lobe (37, 113, 115, 117), occipital, and subcortical areas (6, 118, 119). Regardless of the broken neural substrate was not fixed throughout all of the research, it contains the areas which can be thought of essential for the AON. Undoubtedly, the mirror neurons simply present part of the complicated info for reaching motion comprehension whereas motion recognition and manufacturing happen concurrently by accessing the identical neural representations. Nonetheless, as posited by the influential cognitive neuropsychological fashions of apraxia (120, 121) and demonstrated by varied scientific research (121–124), the vary of doable dissociations between motion execution and motion understanding that may happen in sufferers with apraxia is sort of multifaceted and can’t be defined by a mere motion mirroring mechanism nor by a single lesion locus. Impairments within the visible recognition of motion paralleled deficits in performing these actions might rely upon each frequent and distinct neural localization, most of which could possibly be exterior to reflect areas. Failures in imitating or in recognizing gestures might happen due to harm at any degree within the course of between perceiving (enter lexicon) and performing (output lexicon) an motion (120, 121). Certainly, some apraxic sufferers present deficits within the recognition/discrimination of the gestures, some don’t [for a review (125)]. Theoretical and empirical research counsel that complementary routes to motion understanding going down on the dorso-dorsal and ventro-dorsal stream (126, 127). Lesion in ventral-dorsal stream might impede the top-down activation of motor engrams. It might produce disturbances within the on-line choice and integration of distinctive and related motor acts that guarantee a excessive recognizability of the gesture (117). This may be answerable for the disordered motor planning, imitation, and motor-memory recall of gesture actions present in sufferers with apraxia (126, 127). As has been briefly proven, many questions stay, and there could also be a couple of mechanism resulting in apraxia disturb. Given the complexity of the impairment and the separate neural substrates which can be usually affected in apraxia, therapies associated to motion statement to help motion execution or relearning of gestures of each day residing, will be deliberate.

Neurorehabilitation and Mind Restore After Apraxia

The behavioral success of rehabilitation strategies primarily based on the precept of motion statement ought to promote reorganization by adaptive plasticity on the neural degree (128, 129). Practical reorganization clearly is dependent upon the residual neural integrity of efferent (motor) and afferent (sensory) info, which ends up in improved therapy outcomes amongst some apraxia sufferers however not for others. On this perspective, we thought of three doable sources of informational content material for the way neurorehabilitation and mind restore after apraxia works: damage web site, elapsed time after apraxia onset, and lesion dimension.

The primary issue to contemplate is the situation of the infarct, which may in the end decide the result of rehabilitation therapy. Whereas, lesions of the frontal and parietal cortices within the left hemisphere have been proven to primarily disrupt gesture manufacturing in sufferers with apraxia (2), no clear correlation has been discovered between lesion location and impairment in visible gesture illustration. Apraxic sufferers with cortical lesions—however not these with subcortical lesions—can not comprehend the that means of gestures (130). In uncommon instances, a lesion within the left occipito-temporal cortex may additionally critically hamper the power to acknowledge gestures in sufferers with apraxia (120, 131). Sufferers with parietal lesions have additionally been reported to exhibit important impairments in executing gestures however solely slight impairments in understanding these carried out by others (132). The neural specificity of this disturbed typology might clarify why sure sufferers with apraxia are capable of comprehend the that means of gestures regardless of being unable to carry out them themselves. Accordingly, single-case and group research report dissociations between motion execution and illustration and the underpinning broken neural substrate (121–124). Effectivity and pace of the therapeutic technique of motion statement rely partly on the completely different roles that intact and broken mind areas play in each motion manufacturing and recognition (125, 133). Neural harm to a purposeful system will be partial, and research in monkeys appear to counsel that the frontal and parietal cortices are neurally outfitted for such divisions of labor (134).

A number of research have documented that neurorehabilitation strategies involving statement methods amongst brain-damaged sufferers induce long-lasting neural modifications within the motor cortex, potentiating exercise within the affected areas. In brain-damaged sufferers, TMS research have discovered direct proof of elevated motor-cortex excitability (84), and synaptic and cortical map plasticity have been documented utilizing fMRI (75). TMS research have additionally indicated that motion statement alone is ready to drive reorganization within the main motor cortex, strengthening the motor reminiscence of noticed actions amongst younger (135) and aged topics (imply ages: 34 and 65 years, respectively) (98) and amongst chronically brain-damaged sufferers (84). Moreover, a examine reported optimistic results on gesture imitation of anodal transcranial direct present stimulation (tDCS) on the left parietal in comparison with sham tDCS, supporting the view that apraxia problems in Parkinson (136) and in mind left broken sufferers (51) will be improved by stimulating distinct buildings.

A second issue to contemplate is the temporal stage of the sickness. The neural substrates of motion manufacturing and comprehension could possibly be related to completely different physiological mechanisms at completely different temporal levels of apraxia. Frontal and parietal areas might grow to be briefly inactive due to cerebral edema and intracranial hypertension, hemodynamic indicators of ischemic penumbra, or native inflammatory results in acute however not persistent levels of apraxia (137). Completely different research report that in early intervals (together with an acute four-week, post-onset part), impaired gesture recognition could also be related to left frontal–lobe and basal-ganglia lesions (138), whereas within the persistent levels of the sickness, these deficits will be related to left-parietal lesions (32, 37).

In apply, transitory results similar to the shortcoming to imitate actions from visible cues are sometimes noticed in apraxia’s early levels. In that case, an statement intervention in early remedy could also be inefficacy.

Throughout later apraxia levels, an in depth overlap of the networks underlying statement and execution, as indicated by superior neuroimaging and the lesion places research in sufferers, are useful in figuring out affected person during which observative method is doubtlessly helpful. Remark remedy related to adaptive neurophysiological and neurometabolic modifications will be performed even a number of years after stroke onset. A session of 4 weeks of energetic, 18 days-cycle visible/motor coaching has been discovered to considerably improve motor perform, with will increase within the exercise of particular motor areas that possess mirror properties (75). Massed, high-frequency rehabilitative coaching (300–1,000 each day repetitions) is required to elicit minimal neural reorganization (63). These will increase in cortical exercise throughout each motion statement and execution additionally are typically current within the hemispheres (139, 140) near and much from the lesion web site.

A 3rd doable issue to contemplate is that the failure to hyperlink perceptual and motor representations in apraxia therapy could also be an impact of infarct dimension; bigger lesions usually tend to embrace entrance parietal damage and will not profit from statement therapy. Certainly, enhancements in imitation (replica off-line of the noticed gesture) in sufferers with apraxia are influenced by the dimensions of the parietal lesion (51): the bigger the left parietal harm, the smaller the tDCS treatment-related enchancment. When a purposeful system is totally broken, nonetheless, restoration is achieved largely by technique of substitution and will rely upon the implicit engagement of neural methods to take over the capabilities of the broken areas (141).

Whereas, some methods might represent the websites of gesture efficiency, others might cut back the affect of deficits (142) by stimulating coupled visible information mechanisms (98). The integrity of each the frontal and parietal cortices may be essential for re-learning because of motor mirroring. Nonetheless, non-injured cortical areas might additionally set off extra, impartial inner mechanisms that help however usually are not essential for guiding the motor system to match imaginative and prescient with motor routines (143, 144). Research on the neural representations of motor abilities primarily based on observations of the motor cortex of macaque monkeys (145) and people (146) present empirical help for such an alternate system. These research counsel that congruent exercise throughout motion execution/statement happens even outdoors the canonical “mirror space,” representing a possible normal property of the motor system. Concentrating on interventions on the premise of particular mind buildings intact and broken that might mediate the consequences of coaching is a vital future problem in cognitive neurorehabilitation.

Conclusion

Whereas analysis on the connection between noticed and executed actions in apraxia neurorehabilitation has a brief historical past, it has already offered insights in regards to the optimistic impact of a visual-motor coaching. The statement of actions by a technique of visible retrieval might assist in the number of essentially the most possible motion, offering a strong software for overcoming intentional motor-gestural difficulties (55). Furthermore, tailor-made interventions primarily based on particular person’s skill to accumulate new (or relearn previous) motor-memory traces by multisensory [i.e., auditory (35, 147), olfactory (148, 149), and tactile (150–155)] suggestions will be the most promising method for a standard temporal integration motion (156, 157). Multisensory stimulation can activate a number of cortical mind buildings, inducing cortical reorganization and modulating motor cortical excitability for the stimulated afferents (158, 159). Outcomes are encouraging, however it is very important emphasize that this speculation doesn’t suggest that each one deficits in apraxia will be handled by motion statement remedy. Relatively, we imagine that motion statement may be a therapeutic choice for enhancing praxis perform amongst sure particular typologies of sufferers.

Creator Contributions

MP: examine idea and design, manuscript growth, and writing. GG: contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Well being (RF-2018-12365682 to MP).

Battle of Curiosity Assertion

The authors declare that the analysis was performed within the absence of any business or monetary relationships that could possibly be construed as a possible battle of curiosity.

References

6. Nobusako S, Ishibashi R, Takamura Y, Oda E, Tanigashira Y, Kouno M, et al. Distortion of visuo-motor temporal integration in apraxia: proof from delayed visible suggestions detection duties and voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Entrance Neurol. (2018) 9:709. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00709

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

7. Foundas AL, Macauley BL, Raymer AM, Maher LM, Heilman KM, Gonzalez Rothi LJ. Ecological implications of limb apraxia: proof from mealtime conduct. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. (1995) 1:62–6. doi: 10.1017/S1355617700000114

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

8. Hanna-Pladdy B, Heilman KM, Foundas AL. Ecological implications of ideomotor apraxia: proof from bodily actions of each day residing. Neurology. (2003) 60:487–90. doi: 10.1212/WNL.60.3.487

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

9. Goldenberg G, Hagmann J. Remedy of actions of each day residing in sufferers with apraxia. Neuropsychol Rehabil. (1998) 8:123–41. doi: 10.1080/713755559

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

10. van Heugten CM, Dekker J, Deelman BG, Stehmann-Saris JC, Kinebanian A. Rehabilitation of stroke sufferers with apraxia: the function of extra cognitive and motor impairments. Disabil Rehabil. (2000) 22:547–54. doi: 10.1080/096382800416797

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

11. Sunderland A, Walker CM, Walker MF. Motion errors and dressing incapacity after stroke: an ecological method to neuropsychological evaluation and intervention. Neuropsychol Rehabil. (2006) 16:666–83. doi: 10.1080/09602010500204385

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

12. Borod JC, Fitzpatrick PM, Helm-Estabrooks N, Goodglass H. The connection between limb apraxia and the spontaneous use of communicative gesture in aphasia. Mind Cogn. (1989) 10:121–31. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(89)90079-1

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

13. Tabaki NE, Vikelis M, Besmertis L, Vemmos Okay, Stathis P, Mitsikostas DD. Apraxia associated with subcortical lesions attributable to cerebrovascular illness. Acta Neurol Scand. (2010) 122:9–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01224.x

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

15. Zwinkels A, Geusgens C, van de Sande P, Van Heugten C. Evaluation of apraxia: inter-rater reliability of a brand new apraxia take a look at, affiliation between apraxia and different cognitive deficits and prevalence of apraxia in a rehabilitation setting. Clin Rehabil. (2004) 18:819–27. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr816oa

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

16. Hodges JR, Bozeat S, Lambon Ralph MA, Patterson Okay, Spatt J. The function of conceptual information in object use proof from semantic dementia. Mind. (2000) 123:1913–25. doi: 10.1093/mind/123.9.1913

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

17. Holl AK, Ille R, Wilkinson L, Otti DV, Hödl E, Herranhof B, et al. Impaired ideomotor limb apraxia in cortical and subcortical dementia: a comparability of Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s illness. Neurodegener Dis. (2011) 8:208–15. doi: 10.1159/000322230

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

18. Nelissen N, Pazzaglia M, Vandenbulcke M, Sunaert S, Fannes Okay, Dupont P, et al. Gesture discrimination in main progressive aphasia: the intersection between gesture and language processing pathways. J Neurosci. (2010) 30:6334–41. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0321-10.2010

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

19. Cantagallo A, Maini M, Rumiati RI. The cognitive rehabilitation of limb apraxia in sufferers with stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil. (2012) 22:473–88. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2012.658317

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

20. Worthington A. Remedies and applied sciences within the rehabilitation of apraxia and motion disorganisation syndrome: a evaluation. Neurorehabilitation. (2016) 39:163–74. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161348

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

21. French B, Thomas LH, Coupe J, McMahon NE, Connell L, Harrison J, et al. Repetitive job coaching for enhancing purposeful skill after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2007) 11:CD006073. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006073.pub2

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

22. Smania N, Aglioti SM, Girardi F, Tinazzi M, Fiaschi A, Cosentino A, et al. Rehabilitation of limb apraxia improves each day life actions in sufferers with stroke. Neurology. (2006) 67:2050–2. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000247279.63483.1f

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

23. Buxbaum LJ, Haaland KY, Hallett M, Wheaton L, Heilman KM, Rodriguez A, et al. Remedy of limb apraxia: transferring ahead to improved motion. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. (2008) 87:149–61. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31815e6727

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

26. Goldenberg G. Matching and imitation of hand and finger postures in sufferers with harm within the left or proper hemispheres. Neuropsychologia. (1999) 37:559–66. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00111-0

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

27. Hommel B, Musseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W. The Concept of Occasion Coding (TEC): a framework for notion and motion planning. Behav Mind Sci. (2001) 24:849–78. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

29. Sunderland A, Sluman SM. Ideomotor apraxia, visuomotor management and the specific illustration of posture. Neuropsychologia. (2000) 38:923–34. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00021-X

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

30. Pazzaglia M, Smania N, Corato E, Aglioti SM. Neural underpinnings of gesture discrimination in sufferers with limb apraxia. J Neurosci. (2008) 28:3030–41. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5748-07.2008

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

32. Kalenine S, Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB. Important mind areas for motion recognition: lesion symptom mapping in left hemisphere stroke. Mind. (2010) 133:3269–80. doi: 10.1093/mind/awq210

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

37. Fontana AP, Kilner JM, Rodrigues EC, Joffily M, Nighoghossian N, Vargas CD, et al. Position of the parietal cortex in predicting incoming actions. NeuroImage. (2012) 59:556–64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.046

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

41. Pazzaglia M, Galli G. Translating novel findings of perceptual-motor codes into the neuro-rehabilitation of motion problems. Entrance Behav Neurosci. 9:222. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00222

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content

42. Garrison KA, Winstein CJ, Aziz-Zadeh L. The mirror neuron system: a neural substrate for strategies in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Restore. (2010) 24:404–12. doi: 10.1177/1545968309354536

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

45. Smania N, Girardi F, Domenicali C, Lora E, Aglioti S. The rehabilitation of limb apraxia: a examine in left-brain-damaged sufferers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2000) 81:379–88. doi: 10.1053/mr.2000.6921

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

46. Goldenberg G, Daumuller M, Hagmann S. Evaluation and remedy of complicated actions of each day residing in apraxia. Neuropsychol Rehabil. (2001) 11:147–69. doi: 10.1080/09602010042000204

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

47. van Heugten CM, Dekker J, Deelman BG, van Dijk AJ, Stehmann-Saris JC, Kinebanian A. End result of technique coaching in stroke sufferers with apraxia: a part II examine. Clin Rehabil. (1998) 12:294–303. doi: 10.1191/026921598674468328

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

48. Donkervoort M, Dekker J, Stehmann-Saris FC, Deeolman BG. Efficacy of technique coaching in left hemisphere stroke sufferers with apraxia: a randomised scientific trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil. (2001) 11:549–66. doi: 10.1080/09602010143000093

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

49. Geusgens CA, van Heugten CM, Cooijmans JP, Jolles J, van den Heuvel WJ. Switch results of a cognitive technique coaching for stroke sufferers with apraxia. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. (2007) 29:831–41. doi: 10.1080/13803390601125971

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

50. Geusgens C, van Heugten C, Donkervoort M, van den Ende E, Jolles J, van den Heuvel W. Switch of coaching results in stroke sufferers with apraxia: an exploratory examine. Neuropsychol Rehabil. (2006) 16:213–29. doi: 10.1080/09602010500172350

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

51. Bolognini N, Convento S, Banco E, Mattioli F, Tesio L, Vallar G. Enhancing ideomotor limb apraxia by electrical stimulation of the left posterior parietal cortex. Mind. (2015) 138:428–39. doi: 10.1093/mind/awu343

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

53. Oouchida Y, Suzuki E, Aizu N, Takeuchi N, Izumi SI. Purposes of observational studying in neurorehabilitation. Int J Phys Med Rehabil. (2013) 1:146. doi: 10.4172/2329-9096.1000146

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

54. Rothi LJ, Heilman KM. Apraxia, the Neuropsychology of Motion. Hove: Psychology Press (1997).

Google Scholar

59. Buchanan JJ, Dean NJ. Specificity in apply advantages studying in novice fashions and variability in demonstration advantages observational apply. Psychol Res. (2010) 74:313–26. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0254-y

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

62. Rosenkranz Okay, Williamon A, Rothwell JC. Motorcortical excitability and synaptic plasticity is enhanced in skilled musicians. J Neurosci. (2007) 27:5200–6. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0836-07.2007

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

63. Kleim JA, Hogg TM, VandenBerg PM, Cooper NR, Bruneau R, Remple M. Cortical synaptogenesis and motor map reorganization happen throughout late, however not early, part of motor talent studying. J Neurosci. (2004) 24:628–33. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3440-03.2004

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

64. Sale P, Franceschini M. Motion statement and mirror neuron community: a software for motor stroke rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. (2012) 48:313–8.

PubMed Summary | Google Scholar

65. Franceschini M, Ceravolo MG, Agosti M, Cavallini P, Bonassi S, Dall’Armi V, et al. Scientific relevance of motion statement in upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: a doable function in restoration of purposeful dexterity. A randomized scientific trial. Neurorehabil Neural Restore. (2012) 26:456–62. doi: 10.1177/1545968311427406

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

66. Sale P, Ceravolo MG, Franceschini M. Motion statement remedy within the subacute part promotes dexterity restoration in right-hemisphere stroke sufferers. Biomed Res Int. (2014) 2014:457538. doi: 10.1155/2014/457538

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

67. Park HR, Kim JM, Lee MK, Oh DW. Scientific feasibility of motion statement coaching for strolling perform of sufferers with post-stroke hemiparesis: a randomized managed trial. Clin Rehabil. (2014) 28:794–803. doi: 10.1177/0269215514523145

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

68. Bang DH, Shin WS, Kim SY, Choi JD. The results of motion observational coaching on strolling skill in persistent stroke sufferers: a double-blind randomized managed trial. Clin Rehabil. (2013) 27:1118–25. doi: 10.1177/0269215513501528

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

69. Kim SS, Kim TH, Lee BH. Results of motion observational coaching on cerebral hemodynamic modifications of stroke survivors: a fTCD examine. J Phys Ther Sci. (2014) 26:331–4. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.331

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

70. Bonifazi S, Tomaiuolo F, Altoè G, Ceravolo MG, Provinciali L, Marangolo P. Motion statement as a helpful method for enhancing restoration of verb manufacturing: new proof from aphasia. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. (2013) 49:473–81.

PubMed Summary | Google Scholar

71. Marangon M, Priftis Okay, Fedeli M, Masiero S, Tonin P, Piccione F. Lateralization of motor cortex excitability in stroke sufferers throughout motion statement: a TMS examine. Biomed Res. Int. (2014) 2014:251041. doi: 10.1155/2014/251041

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

72. Brunner IC, Skouen JS, Ersland L, Gruner R. Plasticity and response to motion statement: a longitudinal FMRI examine of potential mirror neurons in sufferers with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Restore. (2014) 28:874–84. doi: 10.1177/1545968314527350

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

73. Ertelt D, Binkofski F. Motion statement as a software for neurorehabilitation to reasonable motor deficits and aphasia following stroke. Neural Regener Res. (2012) 7:2063–74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2012.26.008

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

74. Ertelt D, Hemmelmann C, Dettmers C, Ziegler A, Binkofski F. Remark and execution of upper-limb actions as a software for rehabilitation of motor deficits in paretic stroke sufferers: protocol of a randomized scientific trial. BMC Neurol. (2012) 12:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-42

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

75. Ertelt D, Small S, Solodkin A, Dettmers C, McNamara A, Binkofski F, et al. Motion statement has a optimistic affect on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage. (2007) 36(Suppl. 2):T164–73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.043

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

76. Franceschini M, Agosti M, Cantagallo A, Sale P, Mancuso M, Buccino G. Mirror neurons: motion statement therapy as a software in stroke rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. (2010) 46:517–23.

PubMed Summary | Google Scholar

78. Harmsen WJ, Bussmann JB, Selles RW, Hurkmans HL, Ribbers GM. A mirror therapy-based motion statement protocol to enhance motor studying after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Restore. (2015) 29:509–16. doi: 10.1177/1545968314558598

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

79. Dettmers C, Nedelko V, Hassa T, Starrost Okay, Schoenfeld MA. “Video Remedy”: selling hand perform after stroke by motion statement coaching – a pilot randomized managed trial. Int J Phys Med Rehabil. (2014) 2:189. doi: 10.4172/2329-9096.1000189

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

80. Zhu M-H, Wang J, Gu X-D, Shi M-F, Zeng M, Wang C-Y, et al. Impact of motion statement remedy on each day actions and motor restoration in stroke sufferers. Int J Nurs Sci. (2015) 2:279–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2015.08.006

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

81. Kim C, Bang D. Motion statement coaching enhances higher extremity perform in subacute stroke survivor with reasonable impairment: a double-blind, randomized managed pilot trial. J Korean Soc Phys Med. (2016) 11:133–40. doi: 10.13066/kspm.2016.11.1.133

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

82. Kuk EJ, Kim JM, Oh DW, Hwang HJ. Results of motion statement remedy available dexterity and EEG-based cortical activation patterns in sufferers with post-stroke hemiparesis. High Stroke Rehabil. (2016) 23:318–25. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1157972

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

83. Fu J, Zeng M, Shen F, Cui Y, Zhu M, Gu X, et al. Results of motion statement remedy on higher extremity perform, each day actions and movement evoked potential in cerebral infarction sufferers. Medication. (2017) 96:e8080. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008080

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

85. Cowles T, Clark A, Mares Okay, Peryer G, Caught R, Pomeroy V. Remark-to-imitate plus apply might add little to bodily remedy advantages inside 31 days of stroke: translational randomized managed trial. Neurorehabil Neural Restore. (2013) 27:173–82. doi: 10.1177/1545968312452470

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

86. Lee D, Roh H, Park J, Lee S, Han S. Consuming conduct coaching for stroke sufferers utilizing motion statement and apply of higher limb perform. J Phys Ther Sci. (2013) 25:611–4. doi: 10.1589/jpts.25.611

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

87. Pelosin E, Bove M, Ruggeri P, Avanzino L, Abbruzzese G. Discount of bradykinesia of finger actions by a single session of motion statement in Parkinson illness. Neurorehabil Neural Restore. (2013) 27:552–60. doi: 10.1177/1545968312471905

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

88. Buccino G, Gatti R, Giusti MC, Negrotti A, Rossi A, Calzetti S, et al. Motion statement therapy improves autonomy in each day actions in Parkinson’s illness sufferers: outcomes from a pilot examine. Mov Disord. (2011) 26:1963–4. doi: 10.1002/mds.23745

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

89. Esculier JF, Vaudrin J, Tremblay LE. Corticomotor excitability in Parkinson’s illness throughout statement, imagery and imitation of motion: results of rehabilitation utilizing wii match and comparability to wholesome controls. J Parkinson’s Dis. (2014) 4:67–75. doi: 10.3233/JPD-130212

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

90. Pelosin E, Avanzino L, Bove M, Stramesi P, Nieuwboer A, Abbruzzese G. Motion statement improves freezing of gait in sufferers with Parkinson’s illness. Neurorehabil Neural Restore. (2010) 24:746–52. doi: 10.1177/1545968310368685

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

91. Castiello U, Ansuini C, Bulgheroni M, Scaravilli T, Nicoletti R. Visuomotor priming results in Parkinson’s illness sufferers rely upon the match between the noticed and the executed motion. Neuropsychologia. (2009) 47:835–42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.016

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

92. Tremblay F, Leonard G, Tremblay L. Corticomotor facilitation related to statement and imagery of hand actions is impaired in Parkinson’s illness. Exp Mind Res. (2008) 185:249–57. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1150-6

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

93. Sgandurra G, Ferrari A, Cossu G, Guzzetta A, Fogassi L, Cioni G. Randomized trial of statement and execution of higher extremity actions versus motion alone in youngsters with unilateral cerebral palsy. Neurorehabil Neural Restore. (2013) 27:808–15. doi: 10.1177/1545968313497101

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

94. Sgandurra G, Ferrari A, Cossu G, Guzzetta A, Biagi L, Tosetti M, et al. Higher limb youngsters action-observation coaching (UP-CAT): a randomised managed trial in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. BMC Neurol. (2011) 11:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-80

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

95. Buccino G, Arisi D, Gough P, Aprile D, Ferri C, Serotti L, et al. Enhancing higher limb motor capabilities by motion statement therapy: a pilot examine in youngsters with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Youngster Neurol. (2012) 54:822–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04334.x

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

96. Kim JY, Kim JM, Ko EY. The impact of the motion statement bodily coaching on the higher extremity perform in youngsters with cerebral palsy. J Exerc Rehabil. (2014) 10:176–83. doi: 10.12965/jer.140114

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

97. Kim JH, Lee BH. Motion statement coaching for purposeful actions after stroke: a pilot randomized managed trial. Neurorehabilitation. (2013) 33:565–74. doi: 10.3233/NRE-130991

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

98. Celnik P, Stefan Okay, Hummel F, Duque J, Classen J, Cohen LG. Encoding a motor reminiscence within the older grownup by motion statement. Neuroimage. (2006) 29:677–84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.039

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

100. Fogassi L, Ferrari PF, Gesierich B, Rozzi S, Chersi F, Rizzolatti G. Parietal lobe: from motion group to intention understanding. Science. (2005) 308:662–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1106138

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

104. Hermsdorfer J, Li Y, Randerath J, Roby-Brami A, Goldenberg G. Software use kinematics throughout completely different modes of execution. Implications for motion illustration and apraxia. Cortex. (2013) 49:184–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.10.010

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

105. Leiguarda RC, Merello M, Nouzeilles MI, Balej J, Rivero A, Nogués M. Limb-kinetic apraxia in corticobasal degeneration: scientific and kinematic options. Mov Disord. (2003) 18:49–59. doi: 10.1002/mds.10303

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

106. Sirigu A, Cohen L, Duhamel JR, Pillon B, Dubois B, Agid Y. A selective impairment of hand posture for object utilization in apraxia. Cortex. (1995) 31:41–55. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80104-9

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

107. Sirigu A, Duhamel JR, Cohen L, Pillon B, Dubois B, Agid Y. The psychological illustration of hand actions after parietal cortex harm. Science. (1996) 273:1564–8. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5281.1564

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

108. Grezes J, Decety J. Practical anatomy of execution, psychological simulation, statement, and verb era of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum Mind Mapp. (2001) 12:1–19. doi: 10.1002/1097-0193(200101)12:1<1::AID-HBM10>3.0.CO;2-V

PubMed Summary | 3.0.CO;2-V” goal=”_blank”>CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

110. Iacoboni M, Woods RP, Brass M, Bekkering H, Mazziotta JC, Rizzolatti G. Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science. (1999) 286:2526–8. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5449.2526

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

113. Buxbaum LJ, Shapiro AD, Coslett HB. Important mind areas for tool-related and imitative actions: a componential evaluation. Mind. (2014) 137:1971–85. doi: 10.1093/mind/awu111

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

114. Goldenberg G, Hermsdorfer J, Glindemann R, Rorden C, Karnath HO. Pantomime of software use is dependent upon integrity of left inferior frontal cortex. Cereb Cortex. (2007) 17:2769–76. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm004

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

115. Mengotti P, Corradi-Dell’Acqua C, Negri GA, Ukmar M, Pesavento V, Rumiati RI. Selective imitation impairments differentially work together with language processing. Mind. (2013). 136:2602–18. doi: 10.1093/mind/awt194

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

116. Weiss PH, Ubben SD, Kaesberg S, Kalbe E, Kessler J, Liebig T, et al. The place language meets significant motion: a mixed conduct and lesion evaluation of aphasia and apraxia. Mind Struct Funct. (2016) 221:563–76. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0925-3

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

117. Hoeren M, Kümmerer D, Bormann T, Beume L, Ludwig VM, Vry MS, et al. Neural bases of imitation and pantomime in acute stroke sufferers: distinct streams for praxis. Mind. (2014) 137:2796–810. doi: 10.1093/mind/awu203

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

119. Bizzozero I, Costato D, Sala SD, Papagno C, Spinnler H, Venneri A. Higher and decrease face apraxia: function of the precise hemisphere. Mind. (2000) 123(Pt 11):2213–30. doi: 10.1093/mind/123.11.2213

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

122. Bartolo A, Cubelli R, Della Sala S, Drei S, Marchetti C. Double dissociation between significant and meaningless gesture replica in apraxia. Cortex. (2001) 37:696–9. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70617-8

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

123. Negri GA, Rumiati RI, Zadini A, Ukmar M, Mahon BZ, Caramazza A. What’s the function of motor simulation in motion and object recognition? Proof from apraxia. Cogn Neuropsychol. (2007) 24:795–816. doi: 10.1080/02643290701707412

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

126. Buxbaum LJ, Kalenine S. Motion information, visuomotor activation, and embodiment within the two motion methods. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2010) 1191:201–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05447.x

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

129. Buccino G, Molinaro A, Ambrosi C, Arisi D, Mascaro L, Pinardi C, et al. Motion statement therapy improves higher limb motor capabilities in youngsters with cerebral palsy: a mixed scientific and mind imaging examine. Neural Plast. (2018) 2018:4843985. doi: 10.1155/2018/4843985

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

130. Hanna-Pladdy B, Heilman KM, Foundas AL. Cortical and subcortical contributions to ideomotor apraxia: evaluation of job calls for and error sorts. Mind. (2001) 124:2513–27. doi: 10.1093/mind/124.12.2513

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

131. Moro V, Urgesi C, Pernigo S, Lanteri P, Pazzaglia M, Aglioti SM. The neural foundation of physique type and physique motion agnosia. Neuron. (2008) 60:235–46. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.022

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

132. Halsband U, Schmitt J, Weyers M, Binkofski F, Grützner G, Freund HJ. Recognition and imitation of pantomimed motor acts after unilateral parietal and premotor lesions: a perspective on apraxia. Neuropsychologia. (2001) 39:200–16. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00088-9

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

135. Stefan Okay, Cohen LG, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Celnik P, Sawaki L, et al. Formation of a motor reminiscence by motion statement. J Neurosci. (2005) 25:9339–46. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2282-05.2005

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

136. Bianchi M, Cosseddu M, Cotelli M, Manenti R, Brambilla M, Rizzetti MC, et al. Left parietal cortex transcranial direct present stimulation enhances gesture processing in corticobasal syndrome. Eur J Neurol. (2015) 22:1317–22. doi: 10.1111/ene.12748

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

139. Catmur C, Gillmeister H, Fowl G, Liepelt R, Brass M, Heyes C. By means of the trying glass: counter-mirror activation following incompatible sensorimotor studying. Eur J Neurosci. (2008) 28:1208–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06419.x

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

140. Gazzola V, Rizzolatti G, Wicker B, Keysers C. The anthropomorphic mind: the mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions. Neuroimage. (2007) 35:1674–84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.003

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

142. Buccino G, Solodkin A, Small SL. Features of the mirror neuron system: implications for neurorehabilitation. Cogn Behav Neurol. (2006) 19:55–63. doi: 10.1097/00146965-200603000-00007

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

143. Dinstein I, Gardner JL, Jazayeri M, Heeger DJ. Executed and noticed actions have completely different distributed representations in human aIPS. J Neurosci. (2008) 28:11231–9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3585-08.2008

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

145. Tkach D, Reimer J, Hatsopoulos NG. Congruent exercise throughout motion and motion statement in motor cortex. J Neurosci. (2007) 27:13241–50. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2895-07.2007

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

146. Brown LE, Wilson ET, Gribble PL. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to the first motor cortex interferes with motor studying by observing. J Cogn Neurosci. (2009) 21:1013–22. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21079

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

147. Pazzaglia M, Galli G, Lewis JW, Scivoletto G, Giannini AM, Molinari M. Embodying functionally related motion sounds in sufferers with spinal twine damage. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:15641. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34133-z

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

148. Pazzaglia M. Physique and odors: not simply molecules, in spite of everything. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. (2015) 24:329–33. doi: 10.1177/0963721415575329

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

150. Pazzaglia M, Galli G, Lucci G, Scivoletto G, Molinari M, Haggard P. Phantom limb sensations within the ear of a affected person with a brachial plexus lesion. Cortex. (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.020. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

151. Pazzaglia M, Haggard P, Scivoletto G, Molinari M, Lenggenhager B. Ache and somatic sensation are transiently normalized by illusory physique possession in a affected person with spinal twine damage. Restor Neurol Neurosci. (2016) 34:603–13. doi: 10.3233/RNN-150611

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

152. Costantini M, Bueti D, Pazzaglia M, Aglioti SM. Temporal dynamics of visuo-tactile extinction inside and between hemispaces. Neuropsychology. (2007) 21:242–50. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.21.2.242

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

153. Goldenberg G, Hentze S, Hermsdorfer J. The impact of tactile suggestions on pantomime of software use in apraxia. Neurology. (2004) 63:1863–7. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000144283.38174.07

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

154. Pazzaglia M, Leemhuis E, Giannini AM, Haggard P. The Homuncular Jigsaw: investigations of phantom limb and physique consciousness following brachial plexus block or avulsion. J Clin Med. (2019) 8:E182. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020182

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

155. Pazzaglia M, Scivoletto G, Giannini AM, Leemhuis E. My hand in my ear: a phantom limb re-induced by the phantasm of physique possession in a affected person with a brachial plexus lesion. Psychol Res. (2019) 83:196–204. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1121-5

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

156. Galli G, Pazzaglia M. Commentary on: “the physique social: an enactive method to the self”. A software for merging bodily and social self in motionless people. Entrance Psychol. 6:305. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00305

CrossRef Full Textual content

158. Cramer SC, Sur M, Dobkin BH, O’Brien C, Sanger TD, Trojanowski JQ, et al. Harnessing neuroplasticity for scientific purposes. Mind. (2011) 134:1591–609. doi: 10.1093/mind/awr039

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

159. Regulation LLF, Fong KNK, Li RKF. Multisensory stimulation to advertise higher extremity motor restoration in stroke: a pilot examine. Brit J Occup Ther. (2018) 81:641–8. doi: 10.1177/0308022618770141

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Adblock take a look at (Why?)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *