Introduction
Locomotion requires dynamic interactions between spinal and supraspinal networks (Grillner and Dubuc, 1988; Rossignol et al., 2006). Many research have described the involvement of supraspinal tracts in gait. Notably the corticospinal tract is concerned in expert locomotion and foot placement (Barthélemy et al., 2011) and vestibulo/reticulospinal tracts allow anticipatory and suggestions steadiness management throughout gait (see Mackinnon, 2018). In people, a rising quantity of research are reporting on the function of the vestibular system throughout gait use galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS; Fitzpatrick et al., 1999).
GVS is a noninvasive technique to stimulate electrically the peripheral vestibular system, particularly the vestibular hair cells and irregular vestibular afferents (Goldberg et al., 1982, 1984; Norris et al., 1998). GVS induces responses in muscle groups which might be energetic in a steadiness process (Fitzpatrick et al., 1994), primarily by means of vestibulospinal and reticulospinal tracts (Wilson et al., 1979; Peterson et al., 1981; Kennedy et al., 2004). In most research, GVS is utilized in a binaural, bipolar configuration when the cathode is on one aspect of the pinnacle and the anode on the opposite aspect (Fitzpatrick and Day, 2004; Lajoie et al., 2021). Such a configuration can enhance the firing sample of the irregular vestibular afferents on the cathode aspect and reduce it on the anode aspect (Fitzpatrick and Day, 2004). Responses are usually divided into short-latency response (SLR), medium-latency response (MLR), and long-latency response (LLR). The MLR is essentially the most distinguished and reproducible response and corresponds to the behavioral response, which is a tilt (lean) towards the anode aspect (Britton et al., 1993; Fitzpatrick et al., 1994).
Research have used GVS to evaluate the function of vestibular enter in gait primarily with respect to gait stability (Fitzpatrick and Day, 2004; St. George and Fitzpatrick, 2010). Enter from the vestibular system is essential for foot placement and figuring out the gait path trajectory (Bent et al., 2002, 2004). Moreover, when GVS is utilized throughout gait, it induces a deviation within the ongoing path, and individuals stray towards the anodal aspect which is biggest for slower speeds of locomotion in controls (Fitzpatrick et al., 1999; Jahn et al., 2000; Bent et al., 2004). These results have been extra necessary on the onset of stance, which means that the vestibular system performs a big function within the stability of the limb through the swing-to-stance transition. Nevertheless, the function of the vestibular system throughout gait shouldn’t be totally recognized and the mechanisms by which GVS modulates the gait sample would wish additional investigation.
First, GVS is more likely to have an effect on the spatiotemporal parameters of gait, however the nature of its results stays unclear. Low-intensity noisy GVS, which consists of a loud, alternating electrical present was proven to lower variability within the gait cycle timing and trunk acceleration throughout perturbed treadmill strolling (Wuehr et al., 2016a, b; Lajoie et al., 2021; McLaren et al., 2022). Throughout overground strolling with eyes closed, decreased variability in stride time and stride size have additionally been reported (Wuehr et al., 2016b; Iwasaki et al., 2018; Piccolo et al., 2020). Thus, variability in spatio-temporal parameters appeared to be decreased however the adjustments within the parameters themselves nonetheless must be clarified.
Second, the results of GVS have been reported for the gait cycle as a complete, which could overlook side-dependent variations within the responses and would possibly result in an incomplete portrait of GVS results on gait. Certainly, because the responses to bipolar binaural GVS rely upon the aspect of the cathode/anode (Fitzpatrick and Day, 2004), the results on the gait cycle may also differ between the 2 sides of the physique.
Third, most research apply nGVS constantly all through the gait cycle to evaluate the modulation of spatio-temporal parameters (see Lajoie et al., 2021; McLaren et al., 2022). Nevertheless, vestibular inputs is perhaps required at particular part of the gait cycle, primarily at heel strike or early stance (Bent et al., 2004; Iles et al., 2007). A extra focused stimulation at that part of the gait cycle is perhaps sufficient to result in important adjustments within the gait cycle.
Therefore, on this examine, we aimed to raised perceive the impact of a short-duration, bipolar and binaural GVS pulse utilized on the onset of stance (10 ms after proper heel contact) on the EMG exercise throughout ongoing strolling and on the gait cycle period. We hypothesized that such stimulation would modify the gait sample and the period of the gait cycle differentially between the correct and left decrease limbs. Extra particularly, when making use of a binaural, bipolar GVS, the gait cycle could possibly be both extended or shortened on one aspect with out affecting the opposite aspect. If certainly that’s confirmed, our findings could possibly be clinically related and be on the base of a therapeutic method to try to scale back gait asymmetry in people with neurological impairment.
Supplies and strategies
Contributors
Fifteen wholesome right-handed adults (5 males and 10 ladies) aged 27 ± 7 years (imply ± SD), vary 20–41, volunteered to take part on this examine. As lateralization of the vestibular system is determined by handedness (Dieterich et al., 2003), solely right-handed individuals have been chosen to lower the interindividual variability and allow higher interpretation of the outcomes. The Edinburgh check of guide laterality was used to verify handedness (Oldfield, 1971). Contributors who reported a historical past of otologic, neurologic, cardiovascular, orthopedic, or traumatic sicknesses have been excluded.
Experimental design
The experimental protocol was carried out in two components: first, the motor threshold (T) to the GVS was decided throughout standing, after which GVS was utilized at an depth of 1 or 1.5 T when individuals walked at their comfy pace on a treadmill.
Instrumentation and analysis
GVS
The vestibular system was evaluated in a binaural bipolar GVS configuration with a 200-ms pulse. First, 5-mm silver electrodes have been positioned on the mastoid course of behind the ear. The pores and skin on the mastoid course of behind the ear was ready with abrasive paper (3M Crimson Dot Hint Prep 2236, 3M Well being Care, ON, Canada), and electrode cream was utilized (EC2R Real Grass electrode cream 100 g, Natus, WI, USA). The electrodes have been then mounted with tape (3M Transpore clear plastic tape, 2.5 cm, 3M Well being Care). A cotton padding over the electrodes and a scarf have been used to make sure optimum contact between the electrode and the pores and skin. A GRASS Electrode impedance meter EZM5C (Grass Applied sciences, RI, USA) was used to verify the system impedance (≤1 KΩ at 30 Hz). A relentless present stimulator was used to use the GVS (Digitimer Ltd., DS22A, Cambridge, UK).
Accelerometer
The top is the primary a part of the physique to tilt after GVS utility (Day et al., 1997). We, due to this fact, measured the onset of head acceleration utilizing a triaxial accelerometer positioned on the participant’s head to find out the motor threshold (MT) for the GVS. The individuals wore tight, adjustable swimming caps. A triaxial accelerometer (46 g; Crossbow CXLOZLF3 ± 2 g Module) was positioned on the vertex and hooked up to the cap utilizing adhesive tape. The x-axis of the accelerometer was oriented with the tragus–tragus line, whereas the y-axis was aligned with the nasion and inion. The vertex of the pinnacle was decided because the intersection between each strains. The z-axis corresponded to the vertical with respect to gravity. The accelerometer sensitivity was set to 2 V/g.
EMG exercise
The EMG sign of the correct SOL was recorded utilizing the Neurolog system (band-passed filtered: 10–1,000 Hz, achieve: 100–1,000) with floor electrodes (AmbuR BlueSensor M, ECG Electrodes, Denmark) spaced 1.5–2.0-cm aside. After prepping the pores and skin with abrasive tape, electrodes have been positioned on the correct and left SOL and TA, which have been chosen resulting from their function in producing locomotor exercise on the ankle (Fitzpatrick and Day, 2004). The electrodes have been positioned parallel to the muscle fibers and in accordance with SENIAM suggestions (Hermens et al., 2000). A reference electrode was positioned on the correct tibial tuberosity.
Figuring out the vestibular motor threshold
The entire process to find out the motor threshold to GVS is described in Mikhail et al. (2021), however briefly individuals stood with their head going through ahead, eyes closed, arms alongside the physique, and sporting flat sneakers on a power platform. The space between the left and proper medial malleoli was 50% of pelvic width, which was measured utilizing calipers on the stage of the better trochanter. GVS was utilized 10 instances in random order for every of the next intensities: 0 (management), 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, and 4 mA, with a minimal interval of 5 s between every stimulus. A recruitment curve was constructed utilizing the response evoked by the GVS on the accelerometer sign. The depth at which 50% of the responses exceeded the imply of background sign+1 SD was recognized as an preliminary threshold (Determine 1A). Subsequent, to acquire a extra exact threshold, we stimulated at every 0.1 mA across the preliminary threshold to acquire a last threshold.
Determine 1. (A) Recruitment curve set-up throughout standing. To find out the depth of stimulation, a recruitment curve was constructed to establish the motor threshold (T) to GVS (see Part “Strategies”). The brink was primarily based on the sign from an accelerometer positioned on prime of the pinnacle (vertex) whereas topics have been standing with eyes closed. For this consultant participant, the edge was 2.3 mA. (B) GVS throughout gait on the treadmill set-up: The black hint reveals the EMG sample through the stimulated cycle, and the grey hint reveals the EMG sample through the management cycle. A typical GVS response is proven within the medallion and measures of onset, offset and space are indicated. GVS, galvanic vestibular stimulation; EMG, electromyography.
GVS throughout gait
Contributors have been stimulated at 1 and 1.5 T (30 stimuli every) whereas strolling on a treadmill at a cushty pace (imply = 1.03 ± 0.06 m/s; Determine 1B). A stress sensor was positioned beneath the correct heel to find out the gait cycle onset. The GVS was delivered on the onset of the stance part of the correct leg (10 ms after the stress was elevated below the correct heel). Every participant took half in two periods separated by at the least 2 days. In a single session, the cathode and anode have been positioned over the correct and left mastoid course of, respectively. Within the different session, the electrode placement was reversed, with the cathode positioned behind the left ear and the anode behind the correct ear. The order of the periods was randomized between the individuals.
Knowledge evaluation
EMG responses to GVS
Knowledge from three individuals needed to be excluded resulting from technical errors throughout knowledge assortment, which made the information unusable for evaluation. Subsequently, the information of 12 individuals have been analyzed. Vestibular responses triggered by GVS in the correct and left TA and SOL on the onset of the stance part have been rectified, averaged (n = 30 stimuli), and analyzed. Responses have been thought of SLR if their onset was between 50 and 90 ms; MLR, 90–150 ms; and LLR, 150–300 ms. The latency, period, and amplitude of the response have been decided (see Determine 1B). The onset of every response was recognized as the primary time level at which the EMG sign both fell beneath or rose above 1 commonplace deviation of the imply baseline exercise noticed through the management trials, for ≥10 ms. The offset corresponded to the primary timepoint at which the sign returned to its imply baseline exercise. Response period was outlined because the interval between onset and offset. The world between the onset and offset of the response was measured to quantify response amplitude: the EMG space of the response was normalized to the imply EMG space over the identical interval within the management trials after which multiplied by 100. The response was both facilitatory (>100%) or inhibitory (<100%).
Cycle and EMG burst period
The period of a gait cycle represents the time between two successive contacts of the correct heel. The imply cycle size of the stimulated gait cycle (STIM cycle), the next gait cycle (NEXT cycle), and a management cycle (CTRL cycle) have been measured. To higher perceive the mechanisms underlying the adjustments within the gait cycle period, the EMG period of each SOL and TA have been additionally measured. For every muscle, baseline exercise was quantified by averaging the EMG stage over 200 ms when no exercise was detected within the muscle. The onset of the EMG burst was recognized when the muscle exercise exceeded the baseline EMG exercise by two commonplace deviations for ≥30 ms. The top of the EMG burst was recognized when the EMG exercise decreased to the baseline EMG stage.
Statistical evaluation
Knowledge are expressed as means ± commonplace error of the imply. The Shapiro–Wilk check was used to check the conventional distribution of the information. Two-way repeated-measures evaluation of variance (ANOVA) was used to match amplitude values of various configurations (RCathode vs. LCathode) and depth (1 and 1.5 T). The impact of GVS on the cycle period, heel stance period, and EMG period was assessed at 1 and 1.5 T utilizing a one-way repeated-measures ANOVA. Tukey’s or Holm-Sidak a number of comparability checks have been used to match the management, stim, and subsequent cycles. T check was used to research the impact of cathode configuration (proper × left) on the response of every muscle to GVS at every depth. p < 0.05 was thought of statistically important for all checks. We used Cohen’s d (Cd) to research impact measurement (small, ≤0.2; medium, 0.2–0.8; and huge, ≥0.8; primarily based on Lakens, 2013). All statistical analyses have been performed utilizing the Prism software program model 9.3.1 (GraphPad Software program, Inc., San Diego, CA).
Outcomes
Dedication of stimulation depth within the standing posture
Every participant took half in two periods. In every session, a RCathode or a LCathode configuration was used. First, to find out the depth of stimulation, a recruitment curve was carried out for all individuals, and the motor threshold (T) for vestibular response was recognized, as illustrated in Determine 1A for a consultant participant. For this participant, the edge for RCathode was obtained at 2.3 mA. For the group, the imply thresholds have been 2.6 ± 0.19 for RCathode and a pair of.06 ± 0.2 for LCathode. Subsequent, two distinct intensities have been used to evoke vestibular responses throughout gait: 1 and 1.5 T.
Feasibility of GVS utility throughout gait
GVS utilized throughout gait didn’t induce any antagonistic occasions. Nevertheless, strict pointers got with the individuals previous to knowledge assortment. Notably, they needed to at all times repair a degree in entrance of them and chorus from turning their head to the aspect. Pilot testing indicated that when individuals turned their head whereas stimulation was utilized, they briefly turned disoriented and needed to maintain on to the rails to forestall a fall. As a result of the individuals have been younger and wholesome, they may give attention to the duty, and no fall occurred. Subsequently, the individuals walked trying forward and didn’t really feel any discomfort. Some individuals had tingling sensations and dry pores and skin/itching behind their ears on the finish of the session, as reported beforehand by others (Utz et al., 2011). Nevertheless, these inconveniences have been delicate and temporary.
EMG responses evoked by GVS throughout ongoing locomotion
Every participant walked at their most well-liked pace on a treadmill (imply = 1.03 ± 0.06 m/s). Determine 1B reveals the continuing EMG sample and heel strike throughout gait in a consultant topic. The black traces signify the EMG exercise when GVS is utilized 10 ms after the onset of the gait cycle. It reveals alternation between the TA and SOL in each the left and proper legs, in addition to the heel contact interval (heel stance). The onset of the correct heel contact determines the onset of the correct stance part and was known as the onset of the gait cycle. The grey hint reveals the EMG and heel contact exercise when no GVS was utilized. The stimulated hint (black) is superimposed over the management hint (grey) and allows the identification of the responses evoked by GVS.
Figures 2A,B particulars the response sample noticed in a consultant participant for each RCathode and LCathode configurations. Though the responses diverse throughout the group (see Supplementary Materials), LLRs have been the primary responses noticed for the correct SOL, the correct TA, and the left TA throughout intensities and configurations. Subsequently, these have been the primary responses that have been additional assessed (Desk 1). SLR was the primary response noticed within the left SOL and, accordingly, was additional analyzed.
Determine 2. (A) Proper cathode configuration. (B) Left cathode configuration. GVS stimulation throughout early stance produced SLR, MLR, and LLR in all muscle groups examined. Black arrows point out facilitatory response, grey arrows point out inhibitory response. 50 ms ≤ onset of Quick Latency Response (SLR) ≥ 90 ms; 90 ms ≤ onset of Medium Latency Response (MLR) ≥ 150 ms; 150 ms ≤ onset of Lengthy Latency Response (LLR).
Desk 1. EMG responses in left and proper SOL and TA evoked by RCathode and LCathode configurations.
Responses in SOL
RCathode configuration
When stimulation was utilized, the correct leg was in early stance with EMG in the correct SOL quickly growing and EMG within the left SOL quickly lowering (see Determine 1B). In the correct SOL, LLR was the primary response and consisted of the facilitation of the continuing EMG each at 1 T (amplitude: 168.4% ± 13.4%; latency: 210 ± 10 ms; period: 40 ± 10 ms) and at 1.5 T (amplitude: 202.4% ± 42.8%; latency: 180 ± 10 ms; period: 30 ± 10 ms). Within the left SOL, SLR comprised a facilitation of the continuing EMG each at 1 T (amplitude: 189.2 ± 28.5%; latency: 60 ± 4 ms; period: 30 ± 10 ms) and 1.5 T (amplitude: 250.9 ± 53.7%; latency: 60 ± 4 ms; period: 50 ± 10 ms). Thus, primarily facilitatory responses have been noticed in SOL. No important variations have been noticed within the amplitude, latency, or period of responses between 1 and 1.5 T.
LCathode configuration
In the correct SOL, LLR consisted of suppression of the continuing proper SOL EMG at 1 T (amplitude: 91.7 ± 23.9%; latency: 200 ± 10 ms; period: 30 ± 10 ms) and 1.5 T (amplitude: 83.97 ± 14.19%; latency: 220 ± 3 ms; period: 30 ± 10 ms). Within the left SOL, SLR additionally comprised a suppression of ongoing EMG at 1 T (amplitude: 84.8 ± 29.9%; latency: 70 ± 10 ms; period: 50 ± 10 ms) and 1.5 T (amplitude: 92.3 ± 37.2%; latency: 60 ± 3 ms; period: 30 ± 10 ms). No important variations have been noticed within the amplitude, latency, and period of responses between 1 and 1.5 T in both SOL. Subsequently, responses in SOL are polarity dependent: they facilitate ongoing EMG within the RCathode configuration and suppress ongoing EMG within the LCathode configuration (Figures 3A,B). This polarity-dependency is important, as variations in amplitudes between the configurations are important each at 1 T (pthe correct SOL = 0.042, Cd = 1.62, pthe left SOL = 0.0328, Cd = 1.52) and 1.5 T (pthe correct SOL = 0.0025, Cd = 1.42, pthe left SOL = 0.0416, Cd = 1.48).
Determine 3. Responses in RSOL (A), LSOL (B), and L TA (D) have been polarity dependent, however not statistically completely different between 1 and 1.5 T. Responses in R TA (C) weren’t polarity dependent. RSOL, proper soleus; LSOL, left soleus; L TA, left tibialis anterior muscle groups; R TA, tibialis anterior muscle groups. Statistical significance is proven with an asterisk (*).
Responses in TA
RCathode configuration
A bigger number of responses have been noticed in TA in comparison with SOL (see Supplementary Materials). In proper TA, facilitatory LLRs have been noticed at 1 T (amplitude: 201.5 ± 32.7%, latency: 190 ± 20 ms, period: 30 ± 4 ms) and 1.5 T (amplitude: 275.96 ± 66.94%, latency: 200 ± 30 ms, period: 60 ± 40 ms; Determine 3C). Within the left TA, facilitatory LLR have been noticed at 1 T (amplitude: 149.4 ± 8.2%, latency: 170 ± 20 ms, period: 20 ± 5 ms; Determine 3D) and at 1.5 T (amplitude: 147.7 ± 65.5%, latency: 200 ± 10 ms, period: 20 ± 4 ms). No important distinction was noticed within the amplitude, latency, and period of responses noticed at 1 and 1.5 T.
LCathode configuration
In the correct TA, responses facilitated ongoing EMG at 1 T (amplitude: 163.1 ± 29.6%, latency: 170 ± 10 ms, period: 30 ± 10 ms) and at 1.5 T (amplitude: 174.9 ± 9.8%, latency: 180 ± 10 ms, period: 70 ± 30 ms; Determine 3C). Within the left TA, LLRs have been inhibitory at 1 T (amplitude: 69.5 ± 1.3%, latency: 200 ± 20 ms, period: 200 ± 3 ms) and 1.5 T (amplitude: 75.8 ± 1.6%, latency: 200 ± 10 ms, period: 30 ± 10 ms; Determine 3D). No important variations have been noticed within the latency and period of responses between 1 and 1.5 T in both TA. Whereas no distinction was noticed in amplitude for the correct TA, the amplitude of the response was bigger at 1.5 T than at 1 T within the left TA (p = 0.0194, Cd = 2.12). General, in the correct TA, LLRs have been facilitatory whatever the polarity, and no important distinction was noticed between responses obtained with RCathode and LCathode, both at 1 T (p = 0.402, Cd = 0.48) or 1.5 T (p = 0.2066, Cd = 0.94; Determine 3C). Within the left TA, the character of the LLR trusted the polarity, and a big distinction was noticed within the amplitude of the responses obtained between RCathode and LCathode at 1 T (p < 0.0001, Cd = 6.1) however was marginally important at 1.5 T (p = 0.0571, Cd = 0.89; Determine 3D).
Impact of GVS on gait cycle period
RCathode configuration
Determine 4 summarizes the affect of GVS on cycle period within the RCathode configuration by evaluating cycle size between the management, stimulated, and subsequent cycles (Determine 4A). GVS elevated the period of the stimulated cycle in contrast with the period of the management cycle at 1.5 T (p = 0.0312, Cd = 0.094). Nevertheless, this enhance was not important at 1 T (p = 0.234, Cd = 0.12; Determine 4B). The period of the cycle that follows the stimulated cycle, which is known as the NEXT cycle, was decreased in contrast with the management cycle at each 1 T (p = 0.001, Cd = 0.27) and 1.5 T (p = 0.0017, Cd = 0.21). The stimulated cycle was additionally at all times longer than the following cycle at each intensities (p1T < 0.001, Cd = 0.4 and p1.5T < 0.0001, Cd = 0.3). Whereas the cycle period was elevated within the STIM cycle, the time the individuals spent in stance on the correct heel (proper heel stress) was decreased. Determine 4C reveals a lower in heel stance at 1 T, which is important at 1.5 T (p = 0.0447, Cd = 0.16). To higher perceive the adjustments underlying the lengthening of the STIM cycle, the EMG period of ankle muscle groups have been analyzed additional (see Determine 4A). No important adjustments have been noticed within the EMG period of the correct SOL or TA at 1 T or 1.5 T. Nevertheless, the period of the EMG burst within the left TA and the left SOL elevated within the stim cycle in contrast with the management cycle each at 1 T (left TA: 830 ± 80 vs. 640 ± 50 ms, p = 0.035, Cd = 0.9; left SOL: 690 ± 30 vs. 630 ± 30 ms, p = 0.008, Cd = 0.56) and at 1.5 T (TA: 900 ± 40 vs. 680 ± 30 ms, p = 0.002, Cd = 1.99; left SOL: 710 ± 20 vs. 670 ± 30 ms, p = 0.004, Cd = 0.5; Determine 4D).
Determine 4. R Cathode Configuration. (A) Averaged and rectified EMG sign of left and proper soleus (SOL) muscle groups throughout locomotion. The gait cycle period was measured throughout stimulation (Stim cycle) and likewise for the cycle following the stimulation (Subsequent cycle), in addition to in a management cycle (not proven). (B) The group knowledge present that the period of the Stim cycle will increase considerably throughout stimulation at 1.5 T, however not at 1 T. Moreover, subsequent cycle period is considerably decreased in comparison with the management cycle, and the Stim cycle at each 1 T and 1.5 T. (C) Period of the heel stance was decreased within the stim cycle in comparison with management, which was statistically important solely at 1.5 T. No important distinction was detected for the Subsequent cycle. (D) The period of the EMG burst in LSOL, and LTA was elevated within the Stim cycle in comparison with management at each 1 T and 1.5 T. No important distinction was noticed within the period of RTA and RSOL EMG burst throughout Stim Cycle. Statistical significance is proven with an asterisk (*).
LCathode configuration
Whereas GVS will increase STIM cycle period within the RCathode configuration, there was no important distinction within the period of the gait cycle when GVS was utilized in a LCathode configuration (p1T = 0.136 and p1.5T = 0.191; Determine 5).
Determine 5. L Cathode Configuration. No statistical distinction in cycle period was noticed between the management, stim, or subsequent cycles at 1 T (A) and 1.5 T (B).
Dialogue
On this examine, we utilized a short-duration binaural, bipolar vestibular stimulation on the onset of the gait cycle of the correct leg to characterize vestibular responses and decide the results of GVS on cycle period throughout strolling in wholesome individuals. Responses evoked in the correct SOL, the left SOL, and the left TA have been polarity dependent, being facilitatory in a RCathode configuration and inhibitory in a LCathode configuration. Responses triggered in the correct TA have been facilitatory no matter polarity. Moreover, GVS utilized in a RCathode configuration elevated the period of the stimulated cycle in contrast with the period of the management cycle. This lengthening was because of the elevated period of the EMG bursts within the left TA and the left SOL in contrast with the management at each 1 and 1.5 T. No change in EMG burst period was noticed in proper TA and SOL. General, R Cathode GVS extended the stimulated gait cycle, and these results have been mediated by means of elevated EMG burst period on the anodic aspect.
Traits of the vestibular responses throughout gait vs. standing
Responses have been facilitatory in each left and proper SOL in an RCathode configuration, and so they have been inhibitory in each SOL in an LCathode configuration. Observing the identical responses in each legs throughout gait is completely different from what can be anticipated by making use of bipolar, binaural GVS whereas standing with the pinnacle going through ahead. Within the latter situation, responses between the left and proper SOL are typically reversed with the alternative polarity (Lund and Broberg, 1983; Pastor et al., 1993; Fitzpatrick and Day, 2004). Observing comparable responses on either side was beforehand noticed throughout gait, which suggests it is perhaps inherent to the locomotor process (Iles et al., 2007). Apart from the left SOL, most responses noticed throughout gait have been LLRs, which once more contrasts with responses evoked throughout standing, with the MLR being essentially the most analyzed. This discovering means that longer latency responses could also be a function of vestibular responses throughout gait, as was proposed beforehand (Iles et al., 2007).
Whereas LLRs have been noticed within the RSOL, solely SLRs have been noticed within the LSOL. One rationalization is perhaps that L SOL EMG quickly decreases on the offset of stance to offer method to swing and to TA contraction (Simonsen, 2014). As EMG exercise is absent throughout swing, it won’t be attainable to see a response at later latencies.
The character of the dominant vestibular responses (SLR, MLR, and LLR) within the TA was not as clear as within the SOL, and a bigger variability was noticed relying on the depth and GVS configuration. The obvious stability within the responses noticed in SOL might mirror the popular connectivity of vestibulospinal neurons to extensor muscle groups throughout gait, as was proven for treadmill strolling in cats (Orlovsky, 1972; Matsuyama and Drew, 2000). Moreover, as we’re stimulating on the onset of the stance of the correct leg, we’re within the double help part the place steadiness is extra of a problem (Nielsen, 2003; Simonsen, 2014). The burden switch implies coordination between the correct SOL EMG, which is quickly growing to just accept the physique weight on the onset of stance, and the left SOL EMG, which can be growing for push off on the offset of stance after which rapidly lowering to start out the swing part. This might clarify the extra strong and repeatable responses obtained in SOL, as clear responses are primarily noticed in muscle groups actively engaged in a steadiness process (Wardman et al., 2003; Fitzpatrick and Day, 2004).
Important impact of RCathode GVS on gait cycle period
RCathode GVS extended the period of the continuing gait cycle by growing the burst period of muscle groups situated on the anodic aspect. This extra necessary impact on the anodal aspect echoes earlier findings: when making use of GVS whereas standing, the primary behavioral response is a deviation of the physique (lean) towards the anode (Britton et al., 1993; Fitzpatrick and Day, 2004). Moreover, the GVS additionally brought about individuals strolling overground to deviate their trajectory towards the anode (Bent et al., 2000). Though the impact of GVS on EMG burst period was not assessed within the latter examine, the stimulation may need extended the EMG on the anodic aspect and contributed to the deviation. Furthermore, the RCathode GVS additionally influenced the next gait cycle and shortened its period. This will mirror a compensatory technique geared toward recovering a traditional size cycle throughout gait (Eng et al., 1994; Schillings et al., 2000; Nachmani et al., 2020). The involvement of brainstem networks in figuring out burst and cycle period was additionally noticed throughout fictive locomotion in neonatal mice. Removing of the brainstem decreases the burst period (Jean-Xavier and Perreault, 2018). In parallel, in sufferers with continual bilateral vestibular loss gait initiation is characterised by a decrease most displacement of the middle of stress n the first- and second-steps in contrast with management individuals (Sasaki et al., 2001).
Within the present examine, RCathode GVS induces extended burst period on the anodic aspect, which is perhaps defined by altered notion/sensation induced by GVS. Bilateral bipolar transmastoid GVS causes a complete physique sway directed towards the ear with the anode, no matter the orientation of the pinnacle within the yaw aircraft (Pastor et al., 1993). Fitzpatrick and Day (2004) launched a vector summation mannequin, suggesting that the mind interprets bilateral bipolar GVS predominantly as a “rotation towards the aspect of the cathode,” and that in response to this notion, the evoked postural response (physique sway) is directed towards the anode. Therefore, individuals would understand that they have been falling towards the cathodic aspect, i.e., on the correct as they’re placing their proper foot on the bottom. As a response, the participant would have a postural response towards the left aspect (anode), within the subsequent step. This response might clarify the longer EMG bursts on the anodic aspect (left), whereas the cathode was behind the correct ear. The other GVS configuration (LCathode-RAnode) wouldn’t be in congruence with the postural response through the stimulated cycle, as a result of the participant will carry out a step with the left leg following stimulation, which is on the cathode aspect.
Another rationalization for the distinction within the results triggered by the left and proper cathode is the vestibular dominance of the right-handed individuals recruited. Because the vestibular system is lateralized (Dieterich et al., 2003), the correct cathode may need a extra preponderant impact on the vestibular system within the right-handed individuals. Though that is solely a speculation, it rests on earlier knowledge (Fink et al., 2003) displaying that the correct and left cathode stimulation activated completely different components of the mind in right-handed individuals and that completely different areas are activated by GVS in right- and left-handers (Kirsch et al., 2018). An identical asymmetry might happen caudally in vestibular projections to the spinal twine, which might result in extra dominant responses when the cathode is on the correct aspect. Additional research might make clear this speculation.
Brainstem as a relay station of vestibular afferents within the management of gait
Behavioral responses noticed throughout GVS are because of the activation of the peripheral vestibular system. GVS was discovered to predominantly activate or inhibit thick irregularly firing afferent fibers from each semicircular canals and otoliths (Goldberg et al., 1982, 1984), in addition to hair cells (Norris et al., 1998; De Waele et al., 2002; Cheng et al., 2010; Gensberger et al., 2016). Cathodal present will increase motion potential discharge, whereas anodal currents silence vestibular afferents (Angelaki and Perachio, 1993; Straka and Dieringer, 2000). The completely different afferent alerts will then be processed centrally, weighted, and built-in with different sensory inputs. The knowledge can be transmitted to the decrease limb both straight by means of the vestibulospinal tract or not directly by means of the reticulospinal tract (Wilson et al., 1979; Kennedy et al., 2004). These descending pathways then modulate MN excitability by means of polysynaptic or disynaptic interneuronal networks (Gossard et al., 1996). Subsequently, segmental interneurons that regulate MN excitability and are activated or inhibited by adjustments in vestibular afferent discharge might contribute to those SLR, MLR, and LLR responses. Notably, Renshaw cells present recurrent inhibitory enter to MNs and reply to descending vestibulospinal enter (Pompeiano, 1988). Elevated exercise of vestibular afferents (following cathodal stimulation) might facilitate the motoneuron pool by inhibiting Renshaw cells (Kennedy et al., 2004). One other potential mechanism is the modulation of reciprocal inhibition and presynaptic inhibition interneurons by means of each vestibulospinal and reticulospinal pathways (Manzoni, 1988; Iles and Pisini, 1992; Kennedy et al., 2004).
Vestibular alerts will also be built-in into the continuing gait sample. The Central sample generator (CPG) allows a particular sample of muscle activation that results in flexion/extension and left–proper alternation (Rossignol et al., 2006). It additionally adapts the locomotion to incoming sensory suggestions (notably from the treadmill belt). This intrinsic spinal locomotor community may need a gating impact on the potential modulation of locomotion by vestibular afferents (Guillaud et al., 2020). This risk would possibly underlie the small impact measurement we noticed within the extended period of the gait cycle, particularly when in comparison with the bigger impact measurement of vestibular responses induced within the muscle groups (SLR, MLR, and LLR). As vestibular sign relays details about head motion, such gating is perhaps used to scale back the affect of head motion on the locomotor sample, as instructed by others (Pflieger and Dubuc, 2004).
Limitations
A limitation of this examine is that the gait cycle was solely assessed utilizing heel sensors on one aspect (the correct aspect); thus, the period of the gait cycle itself was not assessed on each legs, which prevents direct evaluation of symmetry. Furthermore, the individuals have been examined solely with eyes open and at comfy strolling speeds. Because the modulation of EMG by GVS is bigger with eyes closed and at slower pace, a wider bracket of speeds ought to be examined, and each eyes open and eyes closed situations ought to be investigated.
Solely right-handed people have been examined, which prevents extrapolation of our conclusion. Future research ought to embody each right-handed and left-handed people. Furthermore, our cohort was younger, and the outcomes is perhaps completely different in older adults, the place GVS sensitivity is mostly elevated (Jahn et al., 2003; Dalton et al., 2014; Peters et al., 2016). Moreover, though the lengthening of muscle exercise on the anodal aspect underlies the lengthening of cycle period, the information don’t inform on the particular contribution of the vestibular system to the muscular adjustments noticed. In subsequent steps, different methods corresponding to time and frequency correlation approaches (see Blouin et al., 2011) ought to be used to make clear the vestibulo-muscular coupling through the gait cycle.
One other limitation is that the recruitment curve was taken throughout standing and never throughout gait. Though the latter method would have enabled a greater approximation of the excitability of the neuronal networks throughout gait, it was technically extra of a problem resulting from time constraints. Certainly, a considerable amount of stimulation was essential to assemble this curve. Throughout standing, we will apply this stimulation comparatively rapidly in a randomized method. Throughout gait, it takes longer, as we don’t need the stimulation to be utilized in consecutive cycles, and we provided frequent resting intervals to individuals to forestall fatigue.
Potential medical affect
The primary impact of a short-duration GVS burst utilized on the onset of the correct gait cycle was the prolongation of EMG exercise on the left aspect (anodic aspect) with out altering EMG activation on the correct aspect. Repeating this stimulation at every cycle would possibly allow the lengthening of the gait cycle over the course of a sequence of locomotion. This method is perhaps helpful in a therapeutic/coaching paradigm with folks with asymmetrical gait, for instance, after a stroke (Verma et al., 2012). Certainly, asymmetrical gait is a crucial situation within the rehabilitation of sufferers with neurological problems, and one which has acquired a lot consideration is poststroke gait impairment (Patterson et al., 2010; Verma et al., 2012; Beyaert et al., 2015). Gait asymmetry is mirrored by a big distinction within the size of the left and proper gait cycles (Kim and Eng, 2003; Patterson et al., 2010; Wonsetler and Bowden, 2017). Throughout therapeutic interventions, the restoration of symmetrical gait (Harris-Love et al., 2001; Lindquist et al., 2007; Kahn and Hornby, 2009) is a crucial aim, however it’s not often totally achieved. Research have demonstrated that asymmetrical gait might be decreased in sufferers with stroke through the use of asymmetrical somatosensory cues, corresponding to these supplied by a split-belt treadmill (Reisman et al., 2007; Malone and Bastian, 2014). Our outcomes recommend that asymmetrical vestibular cues would possibly successfully deal with gait asymmetry as properly. With a configuration the place the cathode is on the nonparetic aspect, repeatedly making use of a low-intensity GVS burst on the onset of the gait cycle might lengthen EMG bursts on the paretic aspect and enhance cycle period. Future research also needs to decide if a brief burst, an extended burst, or steady GVS (corresponding to nGVS) with an RCathode configuration is perhaps acceptable in that regard.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this examine demonstrates {that a} temporary, low-intensity GVS pulse delivered on the onset of stance can enhance the period of the gait cycle by prolonging EMG exercise of ankle muscle groups situated on the anode aspect, however not on the cathode aspect. An identical method could possibly be explored to handle deficits in gait symmetry in people with neurological impairments.
Knowledge availability assertion
The unique contributions offered within the examine are included within the article/Supplementary materials, additional inquiries might be directed to the corresponding writer.
Ethics assertion
This examine concerned human individuals and was permitted by the Analysis Ethics Board of the Heart for Interdisciplinary Analysis in Rehabilitation of Higher Montreal. It was performed in accordance with the ideas established within the Declaration of Helsinki. The individuals supplied their written knowledgeable consent to take part on this examine.
Creator contributions
YM and DB conceived and designed analysis. YM, JC, and DB carried out experiments. FA, AH, and DB analyzed knowledge and ready figures. FA, AH, YM, J-MM-T, and DB interpreted outcomes of experiments. FA drafted manuscript. FA, AH, YM, JC, J-MM-T, and DB edited and revised manuscript. DB permitted last model of manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and permitted the submitted model.
Funding
This analysis is supported by the Pure Sciences and Engineering Analysis Council of Canada (NSERC): Discovery grant to DB; all knowledge acquisition, evaluation and publication prices; wage of YM, partial wage of FA and AH. Scholarship Merite—College of Montreal for FA. The Pure Sciences and Engineering Analysis Council of Canada (NSERC)—USRA scholarship for JC. Fonds de recherche du Quebec en Santé to DB and J-MM-T.
Acknowledgments
We thank Daniel Marineau, Philippe Drapeau, El-Mehdi Meftah, and Helga Tonkov for technical help.
Battle of curiosity
The authors declare that the analysis was performed within the absence of any business or monetary relationships that could possibly be construed as a possible battle of curiosity.
Writer’s observe
All claims expressed on this article are solely these of the authors and don’t essentially signify these of their affiliated organizations, or these of the writer, the editors and the reviewers. Any product which may be evaluated on this article, or declare which may be made by its producer, shouldn’t be assured or endorsed by the writer.
Supplementary materials
The Supplementary Materials for this text might be discovered on-line at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fncir.2022.1065647/full#supplementary-material.
Footnotes
- seniam.org
References
Angelaki, D. E., and Perachio, A. A. (1993). Contribution of irregular semicircular canal afferents to the horizontal vestibuloocular response throughout fixed velocity rotation. J. Neurophysiol. 69, 996–999. doi: 10.1152/jn.1993.69.3.996
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Barthélemy, D., Gray, M. J., Nielsen, J. B., and Bouyer, L. (2011). Involvement of the corticospinal tract within the management of human gait. Prog. Mind Res. 192, 181–197. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53355-5.00012-9
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Bent, L. R., Inglis, J. T., and Mcfadyen, B. J. (2002). Vestibular contributions throughout the execution of a voluntary ahead step. Exp. Mind Res. 143, 100–105. doi: 10.1007/s00221-001-0967-7
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Bent, L. R., Mcfadyen, B. J., Merkley, V. F., Kennedy, P. M., and Inglis, J. T. (2000). Magnitude results of galvanic vestibular stimulation on the trajectory of human gait. Neurosci. Lett. 279, 157–160. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00989-1
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Beyaert, C., Vasa, R., and Frykberg, G. E. (2015). Gait post-stroke: Pathophysiology and rehabilitation methods. Neurophysiol. Clin. 45, 335–355. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2015.09.005
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Blouin, J. S., Dakin, C. J., Van Den Doel, Ok., Chua, R., Mcfadyen, B. J., and Inglis, J. T. (2011). Extracting phase-dependent human vestibular reflexes throughout locomotion utilizing each time and frequency correlation approaches. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 111, 1484–1490. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00621.2011
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Britton, T. C., Day, B. L., Brown, P., Rothwell, J. C., Thompson, P. D., and Marsden, C. D. (1993). Postural electromyographic responses within the arm and leg following galvanic vestibular stimulation in man. Exp. Mind Res. 94, 143–151. doi: 10.1007/BF00230477
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Cheng, P. W., Lue, J. H., Lin, C. T., Day, A. S., and Younger, Y. H. (2010). Evaluation of gentamicin-induced vestibulotoxicity by click on and galvanic vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials: a guinea pig investigation. Neurotoxicology 31, 121–125. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2009.10.009
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Dalton, B. H., Blouin, J. S., Allen, M. D., Rice, C. L., and Inglis, J. T. (2014). The altered vestibular-evoked myogenic and whole-body postural responses in previous males throughout standing. Exp. Gerontol. 60, 120–128. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2014.09.020
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Day, B. L., Severac Cauquil, A., Bartolomei, L., Pastor, M. A., and Lyon, I. N. (1997). Human body-segment tilts induced by galvanic stimulation: a vestibularly pushed steadiness safety mechanism. J. Physiol. 500, 661–672. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp022051
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
De Waele, C., Meguenni, R., Freyss, G., Zamith, F., Bellalimat, N., Vidal, P. P., et al. (2002). Intratympanic gentamicin injections for Meniere illness: vestibular hair cell impairment and regeneration. Neurology 59, 1442–1444. doi: 10.1212/wnl.59.9.1442
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Dieterich, M., Bense, S., Lutz, S., Drzezga, A., Stephan, T., Bartenstein, P., et al. (2003). Dominance for vestibular cortical operate within the non-dominant hemisphere. Cereb. Cortex 13, 994–1007. doi: 10.1093/cercor/13.9.994
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Eng, J. J., Winter, D. A., and Patla, A. E. (1994). Methods for restoration from a visit in early and late swing throughout human strolling. Exp. Mind Res. 102, 339–349. doi: 10.1007/BF00227520
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Fink, G. R., Marshall, J. C., Weiss, P. H., Stephan, T., Grefkes, C., Shah, N. J., et al. (2003). Performing allocentric visuospatial judgments with induced distortion of the selfish reference body: an fMRI examine with medical implications. Neuroimage 20, 1505–1517. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.006
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, R., Burke, D., and Gandevia, S. C. (1994). Activity-dependent reflex responses and motion illusions evoked by galvanic vestibular stimulation in standing people. J. Physiol. 478, 363–372. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020257
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, R. C., and Day, B. L. (2004). Probing the human vestibular system with galvanic stimulation. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 96, 2301–2316. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00008.2004
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, R. C., Wardman, D. L., and Taylor, J. L. (1999). Results of galvanic vestibular stimulation throughout human strolling. J. Physiol. 517, 931–939. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0931s.x
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Gensberger, Ok. D., Kaufmann, A. Ok., Dietrich, H., Branoner, F., Banchi, R., Chagnaud, B. P., et al. (2016). Galvanic vestibular stimulation: mobile substrates and response patterns of neurons within the vestibulo-ocular community. J. Neurosci. 36, 9097–9110. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4239-15.2016
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Goldberg, J. M., Fernandez, C., and Smith, C. E. (1982). Responses of vestibular-nerve afferents within the squirrel monkey to externally utilized galvanic currents. Mind Res. 252, 156–160. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90990-8
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Goldberg, J. M., Smith, C. E., and Fernandez, C. (1984). Relation between discharge regularity and responses to externally utilized galvanic currents in vestibular nerve afferents of the squirrel monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 51, 1236–1256. doi: 10.1152/jn.1984.51.6.1236
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Gossard, J. P., Floeter, M. Ok., Degtyarenko, A. M., Simon, E. S., and Burke, R. E. (1996). Disynaptic vestibulospinal and reticulospinal excitation in cat lumbosacral motoneurons: modulation throughout fictive locomotion. Exp. Mind Res. 109, 277–288. doi: 10.1007/BF00231787
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Grillner, S., and Dubuc, R. (1988). Management of locomotion in vertebrates: spinal and supraspinal mechanisms. Adv. Neurol. 47, 425–453.
PubMed Summary | Google Scholar
Guillaud, E., Seyres, P., Barriere, G., Jecko, V., Bertrand, S. S., and Cazalets, J. R. (2020). Locomotion and dynamic posture: neuro-evolutionary foundation of bipedal gait. Neurophysiol. Clin. 50, 467–477. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2020.10.012
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Harris-Love, M. L., Forrester, L. W., Macko, R. F., Silver, Ok. H., and Smith, G. V. (2001). Hemiparetic gait parameters in overground versus treadmill strolling. Neurorehabil. Neural Restore 15, 105–112. doi: 10.1177/154596830101500204
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Hermens, H. J., Freriks, B., Disselhorst-Klug, C., and Rau, G. (2000). Improvement of suggestions for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 10, 361–374. doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00027-4
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Iles, J. F., Baderin, R., Tanner, R., and Simon, A. (2007). Human standing and strolling: comparability of the results of stimulation of the vestibular system. Exp. Mind Res. 178, 151–166. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0721-2
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Iles, J. F., and Pisini, J. V. (1992). Vestibular-evoked postural reactions in man and modulation of transmission in spinal reflex pathways. J. Physiol. 455, 407–424. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019308
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Iwasaki, S., Fujimoto, C., Egami, N., Kinoshita, M., Togo, F., Yamamoto, Y., et al. (2018). Noisy vestibular stimulation will increase gait pace in normals and in bilateral vestibulopathy. Mind Stimul. 11, 709–715. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.03.005
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Jahn, Ok., Naessl, A., Schneider, E., Strupp, M., Brandt, T., and Dieterich, M. (2003). Inverse U-shaped curve for age dependency of torsional eye motion responses to galvanic vestibular stimulation. Mind 126, 1579–1589. doi: 10.1093/mind/awg163
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Jahn, Ok., Strupp, M., Schneider, E., Dieterich, M., and Brandt, T. (2000). Differential results of vestibular stimulation on strolling and operating. Neuroreport 11, 1745–1748. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200006050-00029
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Jean-Xavier, C., and Perreault, M. C. (2018). Affect of mind stem on axial and hindlimb spinal locomotor rhythm producing circuits of the neonatal mouse. Entrance. Neurosci. 12:53. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00053
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Kahn, J. H., and Hornby, T. G. (2009). Fast and long-term diversifications in gait symmetry following unilateral step coaching in folks with hemiparesis. Phys. Ther. 89, 474–483. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080237
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. M., Cresswell, A. G., Chua, R., and Inglis, J. T. (2004). Vestibulospinal influences on decrease limb motoneurons. Can J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 82, 675–681. doi: 10.1139/y04-080
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Kim, C. M., and Eng, J. J. (2003). Symmetry in vertical floor response power is accompanied by symmetry in temporal however not distance variables of gait in individuals with stroke. Gait Posture 18, 23–28. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362(02)00122-4
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Kirsch, V., Boegle, R., Keeser, D., Kierig, E., Ertl-Wagner, B., Brandt, T., et al. (2018). Handedness-dependent practical organizational patterns throughout the bilateral vestibular cortical community revealed by fMRI connectivity primarily based parcellation. Neuroimage 178, 224–237. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.018
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Lajoie, Ok., Marigold, D. S., Valdes, B. A., and Menon, C. (2021). The potential of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation for optimizing and helping human efficiency. Neuropsychologia 152:107751. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107751
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting impact sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a sensible primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Entrance. Psychol. 4:863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Lindquist, A. R., Prado, C. L., Barros, R. M., Mattioli, R., Da Costa, P. H., and Salvini, T. F. (2007). Gait coaching combining partial body-weight help, a treadmill and practical electrical stimulation: results on poststroke gait. Phys. Ther. 87, 1144–1154. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050384
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Lund, S., and Broberg, C. (1983). Results of various head positions on postural sway in man induced by a reproducible vestibular error sign. Acta Physiol. Scand. 117, 307–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1983.tb07212.x
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Malone, L. A., and Bastian, A. J. (2014). Spatial and temporal asymmetries in gait predict split-belt adaptation habits in stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Restore 28, 230–240. doi: 10.1177/1545968313505912
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Manzoni, D. (1988). Convergence of macular vestibular and neck inputs on vestibulospinal and reticulospinal neurons projecting to the lumbosacral twine. Prog. Mind Res. 76, 145–154. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)64500-8
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Matsuyama, Ok., and Drew, T. (2000). Vestibulospinal and reticulospinal neuronal exercise throughout locomotion within the intact cat. I. Strolling on a stage floor. J. Neurophysiol. 84, 2237–2256. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.5.2237
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
McLaren, R., Smith, P. F., Taylor, R. L., Ravindran, S., Rashid, U., and Taylor, D. (2022). Efficacy of nGVS to enhance postural stability in folks with bilateral vestibulopathy: a scientific assessment and meta-analysis. Entrance. Neurosci. 16:1010239. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1010239
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Mikhail, Y., Charron, J., Mac-Thiong, J. M., and Barthelemy, D. (2021). Assessing head acceleration to establish a motor threshold to galvanic vestibular stimulation. J. Neurophysiol. 125, 2191–2205. doi: 10.1152/jn.00254.2020
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Nachmani, H., Shani, G., Shapiro, A., and Melzer, I. (2020). Traits of first restoration step response following surprising lack of steadiness throughout strolling: a dynamic method. Gerontology 66, 362–370. doi: 10.1159/000505649
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Norris, C. H., Miller, A. J., Perin, P., Holt, J. C., and Guth, P. S. (1998). Mechanisms and results of transepithelial polarization within the remoted semicircular canal. Hear. Res. 123, 31–40. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(98)00096-3
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Patterson, Ok. Ok., Gage, W. H., Brooks, D., Black, S. E., and Mcilroy, W. E. (2010). Analysis of gait symmetry after stroke: a comparability of present strategies and suggestions for standardization. Gait Posture 31, 241–246. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.014
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Peters, R. M., Blouin, J. S., Dalton, B. H., and Inglis, J. T. (2016). Older adults display superior vestibular notion for digital rotations. Exp. Gerontol. 82, 50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2016.05.014
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Peterson, B. W., Bilotto, G., Goldberg, J., and Wilson, V. J. (1981). Dynamics of vestibulo-ocular, vestibulocollic and cervicocollic reflexes. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 374, 395–402. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb30885.x
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Pflieger, J. F., and Dubuc, R. (2004). Vestibulo-reticular projections in grownup lamprey: their function in locomotion. Neuroscience 129, 817–829. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.08.025
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Piccolo, C., Bakkum, A., and Marigold, D. S. (2020). Subthreshold stochastic vestibular stimulation impacts balance-challenged standing and strolling. PLoS One 15:e0231334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231334
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Reisman, D. S., Wityk, R., Silver, Ok., and Bastian, A. J. (2007). Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill can enhance strolling symmetry post-stroke. Mind 130, 1861–1872. doi: 10.1093/mind/awm035
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Sasaki, O., Asawa, S., Katsuno, S., Usami, S., and Taguchi, Ok. (2001). Gait initiation in bilateral vestibular loss. Auris Nasus Larynx 28, 295–299. doi: 10.1016/s0385-8146(01)00094-3
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Schillings, A. M., Van Wezel, B. M., Mulder, T., and Duysens, J. (2000). Muscular responses and motion methods throughout stumbling over obstacles. J. Neurophysiol. 83, 2093–2102. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.4.2093
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
St. George, R. J., and Fitzpatrick, R. C. (2010). The sense of self-motion, orientation and steadiness explored by vestibular stimulation. J. Physiol. 589, 807–813. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.197665
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Straka, H., and Dieringer, N. (2000). Convergence sample of uncrossed excitatory and inhibitory semicircular canal-specific inputs onto second-order vestibular neurons of frogs. Group of vestibular aspect loops. Exp. Mind Res. 135, 462–473. doi: 10.1007/s002210000544
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Utz, Ok. S., Korluss, Ok., Schmidt, L., Rosenthal, A., Oppenlander, Ok., Keller, I., et al. (2011). Minor antagonistic results of galvanic vestibular stimulation in individuals with stroke and wholesome people. Mind Inj. 25, 1058–1069. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2011.607789
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Verma, R., Arya, Ok. N., Sharma, P., and Garg, R. Ok. (2012). Understanding gait management in post-stroke: implications for administration. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 16, 14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.12.005
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Wardman, D. L., Day, B. L., and Fitzpatrick, R. C. (2003). Place and velocity responses to galvanic vestibular stimulation in human topics throughout standing. J. Physiol. 547, 293–299. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.030767
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Wilson, V. J., Peterson, B. W., Fukushima, Ok., Hirai, N., and Uchino, Y. (1979). Evaluation of vestibulocollic reflexes by sinusoidal polarization of vestibular afferent fibers. J. Neurophysiol. 42, 331–346. doi: 10.1152/jn.1979.42.2.331
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Wonsetler, E. C., and Bowden, M. G. (2017). A scientific assessment of mechanisms of gait pace change post-stroke. Half 1: spatiotemporal parameters and asymmetry ratios. Prime. Stroke Rehabil. 24, 435–446. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2017.1285746
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Wuehr, M., Nusser, E., Decker, J., Krafczyk, S., Straube, A., Brandt, T., et al. (2016a). Noisy vestibular stimulation improves dynamic strolling stability in bilateral vestibulopathy. Neurology 86, 2196–2202. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002748
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Wuehr, M., Nusser, E., Krafczyk, S., Straube, A., Brandt, T., Jahn, Ok., et al. (2016b). Noise-enhanced vestibular enter improves dynamic strolling stability in wholesome topics. Mind Stimul. 9, 109–116. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.08.017
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Adblock check (Why?)