Introduction
Somatosensory processes allow us to detect, localize, and understand the standard and depth of sensory stimuli on our our bodies, and to tell apart self-generated from externally generated stimuli (Schafer and Marcus, 1973; Blakemore et al., 1998). On Earth, it has been proven that self-produced somatosensory stimuli (i.e., stimuli associated to the execution of a voluntary motion) are typically perceived as much less intense than these externally generated (i.e., stimuli unrelated to at least one’s personal motion) of the identical depth (Blakemore et al., 1998; Burin et al., 2017). This phenomenon, named somatosensory attenuation (SA), has been instructed to underlie the excellence between self and non-self, which has a vital position in detecting and promptly responding to exterior stimuli which are doubtlessly related for survival (Kilteni and Ehrsson, 2017; Pyasik et al., 2021). SA is regarded as rooted within the building of an inside mannequin, constructed on the combination of afferent and efferent multisensory indicators. Amongst afferent indicators, a related position should be performed by the vestibular sign which encodes head/physique place with respect to gravity. Nonetheless, the precise contribution of the vestibular system and the sense of gravity to somatosensory cognition underlying distinction of self-generated and externally generated sensations continues to be unknown. To deal with this concern, we investigated whether or not momentary modulation of the gravitational enter by head-down tilt mattress relaxation (HDBR)–a well known Earth-based analog of microgravity–may considerably affect notion of a self-generated stimulus produced by one’s personal supposed actions, in comparison with an equivalent externally generated stimulus.
Somatosensory attenuation phenomenon is believed to come up when the sensory consequence of a voluntary motion matches the consequence predicted by an inside ahead mannequin (Miall and Wolpert, 1996), wherein duplicates of the motor instructions of voluntary actions are used to foretell and suppress the sensory penalties of that particular motion (Waszak et al., 2012). Specifically, in a self-generated motion, the descending motor command is accompanied by an inside illustration of that command, named efference copy, which is then used to foretell the sensory suggestions of the motion. This sensory prediction is in contrast with the precise sensory suggestions from the sensory receptors or “reafference.” If the prediction matches the precise sensory suggestions, sensory attenuation of self-generated stimuli is prone to happen (Blakemore et al., 1998; Borhani et al., 2017; Burin et al., 2017). On Earth, the expectation of the fixed drive of gravity is an inherent element of this inside mannequin (Carriot et al., 2015). By integrating data from a number of modalities into its inside mannequin, the mind can detect and anticipate the consequences of gravity on each self-generated actions and compensatory reflexes (McIntyre et al., 1998; Zupan et al., 2002). Consequently, the constructed neural illustration of the physique and its elements, in addition to their actions are usually preserved (Carriot et al., 2015).
In area, the vestibular system is abruptly disadvantaged of the sense of gravity (Demir and Aydın, 2021). This hampered peripheral enter might in flip have an effect on vestibular cortical projections to areas the place the combination of sensory inputs takes place, such because the parieto-insular cortex, the thalamus, and the temporoparietal cortex (Demertzi et al., 2016; Van Ombergen et al., 2017). Certainly, throughout spaceflight altered integration of the vestibular enter with somatosensory, proprioceptive, and visible indicators misinforms the mind with respect to its current (i.e., Earth-based) inside mannequin of the anticipated sensory penalties of the actions (Freeman, 2000). The battle between the mind’s expectation of the sensory suggestions and the precise sensory expertise can also be thought to underlie movement illness within the early phases of the spaceflight (Carriot et al., 2021). Thus, an accurate inside mannequin is essential to construct an enough illustration of our personal actions and is key for veridical somatosensory processing of self-generated and externally generated stimuli (Kilteni and Ehrsson, 2020).
Lately, the SA phenomenon has been broadly studied in several sensory modalities, utilizing behavioral and psychophysical strategies (Kearney and Brittain, 2021; Kiepe et al., 2021). Some research instructed the significance of vestibular data each within the building of a coherent inside mannequin of a motion (Inexperienced et al., 2005) and within the modulation of somatosensory notion (Ferrè et al., 2013a,b, 2015; Moro and Harris, 2018), however the particular contribution of a modulation of vestibular indicators to the SA phenomenon has by no means been investigated. Earlier research investigating the consequences of momentary postural adjustments or brief interval of HDBR of as much as 2 h on mind exercise reported decreases in EEG energy of the alpha, beta, and gamma bands (Schneider et al., 2008; Chang et al., 2011; Spironelli and Angrilli, 2017) and elevated cerebral oxygenation within the prefrontal cortex related to a slight enchancment of government functioning (Mekari et al., 2022). Lengthy-term HDBR is utilized by area companies to review adjustments related to long-term spaceflight and consists in putting wholesome topics in −6° head-down tilt mattress relaxation. Lengthy-term HDBR is certainly an accepted Earth-based mannequin of the microgravity and represents each physiologically and perceptually the bottom place finest resembling weightlessness in area setting (Pavy-Le Traon et al., 2007). In these fashions (Roberts et al., 2010, 2015), as in microgravity (Karmali and Shelhamer, 2008; Clément et al., 2020; Salatino et al., 2021), the burden of vestibular inputs is drastically lowered. Nonetheless, though the consequences of sustained HDBR on totally different domains of spatial cognition have been investigated (Clément et al., 2008, 2013; Roberts et al., 2019), it’s nonetheless unclear whether or not long-term or momentary modulations of vestibular inputs by HDBR might have an effect on the emergence of the SA phenomenon.
With the current research we aimed to analyze whether or not a modulation of the vestibular indicators by short-period HDBR may affect (i) the overall notion of somatosensory stimulations and, extra particularly, (ii) the depth ranking of self-generated stimuli in comparison with equivalent however externally generated stimuli. We hypothesized that short-period HDBR might differentially have an effect on somatosensory notion of self- and externally generated stimuli. Particularly, we anticipated that HDBR circumstances, by decreasing the burden of vestibular data, may have an effect on somatosensory notion and the flexibility to tell apart between self-generated and externally generated sensations as measured by the SA phenomenon.
Supplies and strategies
Contributors
Forty wholesome volunteers (23 females; age vary: 22–27 years outdated) had been recruited for this research. Contributors had no historical past of neurological or psychiatric illness. All members had been categorized as right-handed in line with the Edinburgh Handedness Stock (Oldfield, 1971).
All members gave their written consent after being knowledgeable in regards to the experimental process of the research, which was accepted by the Bioethics Committee of the College of Turin. Contributors had been volunteers and obtained no remuneration.
Sensory attenuation (SA)
Through the experiment, the lateral digital nerve of the members’ dominant index finger was stimulated utilizing 5-mm-diameter Ag/AgCl classical bipolar floor electrodes connected on the lateral facet of the tip and base of the finger. The stimulator (Digitimer DS7A) delivered non-painful electrical stimuli. To find out particular person somatosensory threshold, members had been instructed to shut their eyes and report verbally after they felt stimulation on their proper index finger. The brink was decided by an ascending-descending-ascending staircase methodology and set at an depth at which the participant reported feeling a stimulus on 50% of trials (3 out of 6). The stimulation depth (2.5 instances the subjective threshold + 4 mA with 300 V voltage) was the identical for every trial and it was chosen in line with the outcomes of a preliminary experiment that examined the impact of various intensities (Burin et al., 2017). Two buttons had been related to {the electrical} stimulator to set off the stimulation: one was positioned beneath the participant’s index finger and the opposite one beneath the experimenter’s index finger [see also (Pyasik et al., 2019)].
Contributors had been instructed to press the button after they heard “You” (Self situation) or to remain nonetheless whereas the experimenter pressed the button after they heard “Me” (Different situation). A complete of 40 stimuli had been administered (20 self-generated and 20 generated by the experimenter). Eight catch trials (i.e., a trial with out stimulation) had been additionally included in a random order to keep away from response biases and to manage for phantom sensations (i.e., false detection of the somatosensory stimuli). The order of the 48 trials was randomized throughout members. To be able to keep away from habituation, each 20 stimulations the experimenter barely shifted the place of the stimulating electrode. On the finish of every trial, members had been requested to price the perceived depth of the stimulus (i.e., depth ranking) delivered to their proper hand on a 0–7 Likert scale, with 0 indicating “absence of stimulation” and seven indicating “highest depth.” Notice that members had been instructed that the depth of the stimuli would by no means attain the extent of ache and that three “familiarization” stimuli had been administered by the experimenter earlier than the primary experiment to current the members with the approximate depth of the stimuli and to keep away from disproportionately excessive rankings for the primary stimuli of the primary experiment.
Process
Contributors had been blindfolded to keep away from the affect of visible cues on somatosensory notion. The SA paradigm was administered beneath two totally different experimental circumstances in line with the place of members: (1) Upright, the place members had been seated on a chair and with each arms and fingers on the desk (2) HDBR, the place members had been mendacity supine on the mattress with their heads tilted six levels downward and their arms at their sides (Determine 1). The order of the 2 circumstances was randomized throughout members and the somatosensory threshold was calculated twice, i.e., earlier than beginning to administer the SA paradigm in every situation. Your complete experiment lasted about 1 h; 20 min for every situation with a 10-min break. HDBR was carried out in accordance with the worldwide tips for the standardization of mattress relaxation research within the spaceflight context.
Determine 1. Experimental setting in (A) upright place and in (B) six levels head-down tilt mattress relaxation (HDBR).
Knowledge evaluation
SPSS Statistics software program (IBM, model 28.0) was used for information evaluation. Self-ranking scores had been intra-subject normalized utilizing z-score transformations (i.e., for every participant, every ranking worth was subtracted by the imply ranking after which divided by the usual deviation) as a way to acquire comparable measures among the many members (Romano et al., 2014; Burin et al., 2017). The Shapiro-Wilk take a look at, carried out on the z-transformed values, indicated that each one variables had been usually distributed (p > 0.05). To be able to detect modulations of somatosensory thresholds by HBDR, a paired t-test was carried out to match imply values of the 2 positions. To discover bedrest modulation of sensory attenuation phenomenon, a repeated measures ANOVA with Agent (Self, Different) and Place (Upright, HDBR) as within-subject elements was carried out on depth ranking. Since SA is probably not current in all people (Reznik et al., 2015; Burin et al., 2017; Majchrowicz and Wierzchoń, 2021), as a way to particularly examine putative modulation of sensory attenuation by HDBR, we additionally carried out the identical evaluation individually in members who confirmed sensory attenuation in upright place (i.e., constructive distinction between other-generated stimuli and self-generated stimuli). Submit hoc comparisons had been carried out utilizing the Pupil–Newman–Keuls take a look at. Correlations between somatosensory thresholds and the quantity of sensory attenuation (calculated because the distinction between the ratios of Self and Different circumstances for every place) had been additionally calculated utilizing Pearson’s correlation. Statistical significance of p < 0.05 was assumed.
Outcomes
Somatosensory notion
Primarily based on the person somatosensory threshold, the common stimulation depth was 8.9 ± 1.24 mA. No statistical distinction was discovered between somatosensory thresholds within the two totally different positions [t(39) = −0.168; p = 0.868]. The repeated-measures ANOVA confirmed a important impact of Agent [F(1, 39) = 6.629; p = 0.014; ηp2 = 0.709] and Place [F(1, 39) = 4.812; p = 0.034; ηp2 = 0.571] whereas the interplay Agent by Place was not important [F(1, 39) = 1.760; p = 0.192; ηp2 = 0.253]. Surprisingly, the numerous impact of the issue Agent confirmed that self-generated stimulations had been perceived as extra intense than these generated by others (Self: Median = 4.5, MAD = 1; Different: Median = 4.25, MAD = 1) whatever the participant’s place (Determine 2A). As well as, the issue place confirmed that somatosensory stimulation was perceived as extra intense throughout upright than in HDBR situation (Upright: Median = 4.75, MAD = 0.75; HDBR: Median = 4, MAD = 0.75) no matter Agent (Determine 2B).
Determine 2. Depth ranking of somatosensory stimulations in: (A,B) the entire group (n = 40); (C) the sub-group of members exhibiting sensory attenuation in upright place (n = 14); (D) the sub-group of members exhibiting reversed sensory attenuation in upright place (n = 26). Knowledge have been remodeled into z-scores and offered as imply and commonplace error of the imply (SEM). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.
Sensory attenuation
SA + subgroup
To be able to examine putative modulation of sensory suppression phenomenon by HDBR, we chosen people exhibiting, within the upright place, the sensory attenuation phenomenon (i.e., sensory attenuation for self-generated stimuli). A complete of 14 members (35% of the pattern) had been recognized and their efficiency as a bunch was analyzed as earlier than for the whole pattern. Additionally on this group, the t-test evaluating somatosensory thresholds within the two positions was not important [t(13) = −0.436; p = 0.670]. However, the repeated measures ANOVA analyzing the consequences of Place on sensory attenuation confirmed a important impact of Agent [F(1, 13) = 5.619; p = 0.034; ηp2 = 0.592] and a major interplay Agent by Place [F(1, 13) = 9.230; p = 0.010; ηp2 = 0.802]. Newman–Keuls submit hoc analyses confirmed that whereas the issue Agent was statistically important within the Upright situation (p = 0.003), it was not important within the HDBR situation (p = 0.907). Particularly, SA attenuation was current within the Upright situation (Self: Median = 4, MAD = 1; Different: Median = 5, MAD = 1) however not throughout HDBR (Self: Median = 4, MAD = 0.5; Different: Median = 4, MAD = 0.75). Furthermore, different stimulations within the Upright situation had been rated as considerably extra intense than these produced by Self (p = 0.003) and Different (p = 0.001) in HDBR (Determine 2C).
rSA subgroup
A complete of 26 members confirmed reversed sensory attenuation (rSA) at Upright, as self-generated stimulations had been rated as extra intense than these generated by others. As for earlier analyses, no statistical variations of somatosensory threshold had been noticed between the 2 positions [t(25) = 0.128; p = 0.899]. A repeated measures ANOVA confirmed an impact of Agent [F(1, 25) = 59.058; p < 0.001; ηp2 = 0.703], however not Place [F(1, 25) = 3.165; p = 0.087] nor the interplay of Agent by Place [F(1, 25) = 0.395; p = 0.536]. Extra particularly, Self-stimulations had been rated as extra intense than these produced by Others (Self: Median = 5, MAD = 1; Different: Median = 4, MAD = 1.25), whatever the place (Determine 2D).
Correlation evaluation
We computed a collection of Pearson correlations in the entire group (N = 40) between somatosensory threshold and the sensory attenuation index (i.e., subjective ranking for Self-stimulation minus Different-stimulation) for every place (Upright, HDBR). A big adverse correlation was noticed within the Upright situation between the somatosensory threshold and the quantity of sensory attenuation (r = −0.34, p = 0.029). In different phrases, people with decrease somatosensory thresholds additionally had a better sensory attenuation phenomenon (Determine 3). Apparently, this correlation was not important within the HDBR place (r = −0.10, p = 0.94). No different comparability resulted to be important.
Determine 3. Pearson’s correlation between particular person somatosensory thresholds and sensory attenuation (SA) index (i.e., distinction between the z-transformed subjective rankings for self-stimulation and other-stimulation).
Dialogue
We investigated the influence of short-period Head-Down Bedrest (HDBR) on the somatosensory notion of self-generated and other-generated stimuli, as measured by the sensory attenuation (SA) phenomenon, whereby self-generated stimuli are perceived as much less intense than stimuli generated by others. In all members, an affect of HDBR on the notion of the depth of somatosensory stimuli was noticed independently of the agent producing the stimulation and in absence of adjustments of somatosensory threshold. Furthermore, a major modulation of SA by HDBR was present in a subgroup of members.
Somatosensory notion
General, somatosensory stimuli throughout HDBR had been perceived as much less intense than within the upright place, whatever the agent administering the stimulus. In different phrases, members underestimated the depth of somatosensory stimuli when mendacity within the head-down place. This modification occurred in absence of somatosensory threshold adjustments, indicating modulation of higher-level somatosensory processes by the HDBR.
To our information no information exist on the putative affect of Earth-based fashions of microgravity on estimation of the depth of somatosensory stimuli. Nonetheless, our outcomes are consistent with numerous experimental research exhibiting tactile notion modulation induced by vestibular stimulation. For instance, left-cold caloric vestibular stimulation (CVS), which prompts cortical vestibular areas (Bottini et al., 2005), has been proven to extend tactile sensitivity of each fingers in wholesome people (Ferrè et al., 2011a,b) and enhance somatosensory issues in proper (Vallar et al., 1990, 1993) and left brain-damaged sufferers (Bottini et al., 2005). An enchancment of somatosensation has additionally been induced by subliminal galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS). In reality, left GVS has been proven to bilaterally improve each tactile sensitivity (Ferrè et al., 2013b) and localization of tactile stimuli (Ferrè et al., 2013c), and each proper and left subliminal GVS improved tactile extinction, with lasting results even after a small variety of periods (Kerkhoff et al., 2011; Schmidt et al., 2013).
However, our outcomes additionally appear to be consistent with earlier research which have proven that experimental modulations of vestibular enter can affect somatosensory processing of noxious stimuli. For instance, an total lower in ache sensitivity and altered EEG exercise of the ache community had been noticed after 2 h of HDBR (Spironelli and Angrilli, 2011). Notably, the stimulation depth of our research (i.e., 8.9 ± 1.24 mA) was greater than in earlier research utilizing the identical stimulator to analyze non-painful stimuli [3.65 ± 1.09 mA, (Fossataro et al., 2018)] and ache thresholds [4.59 ± 2.44 mA; (Boggio et al., 2008)], however decrease than the depth of stimuli perceived as painful [34.82 ± 10.63 mA, (Fossataro et al., 2018)], suggesting that members might have perceived {the electrical} stimulation as reasonably painful. In keeping with these findings, CVS has been discovered to extend tactile sensitivity however lower each the notion of ache depth (Ferrè et al., 2013a) and EEG early cortical responses in somatosensory areas (Ferrè et al., 2015). Persistently, additionally in medical populations, CVS has been discovered to scale back ache notion in sufferers with central post-stroke ache (Ramachandran et al., 2007; McGeoch et al., 2008, 2009; Spitoni et al., 2016), persistent ache and allodynia (Ngo et al., 2015) and complications (Wilkinson et al., 2017). Nonetheless, we didn’t management for subjective ache expertise in our pattern, stopping us from drawing agency conclusions on the subjective high quality of somatosensory sensations.
The above findings might replicate the advanced and multidimensional nature of the somatosensory system, supporting the speculation that vestibular indicators might have dissociable results on the varied totally different channels inside this method (Ferrè et al., 2015). Ache notion is a posh course of that entails the combination of sensory, emotional, and cognitive elements. The notion of painful stimuli is certainly very heterogeneous and could also be affected by top-down cognitive processes (Torta et al., 2020), trait persona (Grouper et al., 2021), the depth of stimulation and anxiety-dependent ache expectancy (Fossataro et al., 2018). Additionally tactile notion, moreover counting on elementary somatosensory processing, entails greater stage cognition (Vaishnavi et al., 2000; Ricci et al., 2019, 2021). Thus, it’s doable that in our research the vestibular modulation primarily affected excessive stage somatosensory processing (i.e., magnitude estimation of the feeling elicited by electrical stimulation), slightly than elementary ranges of stimulus processing, as instructed by the unvaried somatosensory threshold throughout HDBR.
In line with the noticed behavioral modulation, a number of neuroimaging investigations over time have corroborated the proof of anatomical overlap between vestibular cortical projections and areas concerned not solely in main somatosensory processing but additionally in greater stage cognition [for a review see: (Lopez et al., 2012)]. Particularly, fMRI and PET research in vestibular sufferers and wholesome members present process vestibular stimulation have revealed a distributed vestibular community involving, along with the somatosensory cortices, multisensory areas such because the posterior and anterior insula, temporoparietal junction, superior temporal gyrus and the inferior parietal lobule (Lopez and Blanke, 2011; zu Eulenburg et al., 2012). Apparently, with regard to microgravity analog-models, latest fMRI research present that HDBR results in adjustments within the purposeful connectivity of vestibular, sensorimotor and somatosensory areas (Cassady et al., 2016). Elevated purposeful connectivity was discovered between motor and somatosensory areas after long-term HDBR, whereas decreased purposeful connectivity was noticed in different areas of the vestibular community, akin to temporoparietal areas, after each short-term and long-term HDBR (Liao et al., 2015; Cassady et al., 2016). It is very important be aware that, though these mind areas have been proven to reply otherwise to intensity-matched tactile and painful stimuli (Su et al., 2019), they responded to each modalities, suggesting {that a} modulation of their exercise might have occurred additionally in our research. We are able to hypothesize that, in our research, the momentary discount of vestibular enter by HDBR might have primarily affected the exercise of areas concerned in greater stage processes, akin to, for instance, magnitude estimation which primarily engages the fitting posterior parietal cortex (Walsh, 2003; Mennemeier et al., 2005), slightly than areas concerned in main somatosensory processing.
In conclusion, our outcomes present proof that short-term HDBR induces a normal subjective underestimation of the depth of somatosensory stimuli. Though there are a number of strains of proof supporting the speculation that this impact might be attributed to decreased vestibular afferents and altered exercise inside areas contributing to somatosensory cognition, the current research doesn’t immediately assess the neural correlates of behavioral adjustments. Future research are wanted to analyze the neural mechanisms underlying the noticed results.
Sensory attenuation (SA)
Unexpectedly, in our pattern, solely 35% of the members confirmed, at particular person stage, sensory attenuation for self-produced stimuli within the upright place (SA +), whereas the opposite members confirmed reversed SA (rSA), i.e., self-generated stimuli had been rated as extra intense than these generated by others (Reznik et al., 2015; Majchrowicz and Wierzchoń, 2021). Apparently, SA + was modulated by HDBR whereas rSA was not, suggesting that totally different processes could also be activated.
In response to Reznik and collaborators (Reznik et al., 2015), the magnitude and the path of SA phenomena might depend upon the depth of stimulation, as SA + would happen when energetic self-generated actions lead to supra-threshold stimuli. Right here, we solely used supra-threshold stimuli however rSA was discovered within the majority of the members, subsequently different elements have to be thought of. For instance, different research counsel that the amplitude of SA is modulated additionally by the action-effect contingency [i.e., the temporal proximity between actions and their sensory consequences, (Baess et al., 2011; Dogge et al., 2019; Han et al., 2022)] or the energy of the agent’s prior beliefs (Desantis et al., 2012). In our research the contingency and the predictability of the outcomes had been saved fixed throughout circumstances, whereas the members’ beliefs weren’t managed.
Apparently, our information counsel that the person somatosensory threshold might play a related position within the sensory attenuation of self-generated stimuli. Certainly, within the upright place, a adverse correlation was discovered between somatosensory thresholds and SA scores, indexing that decrease somatosensory thresholds facilitate the emergence of the SA phenomenon. Moreover, empirical proof means that each somatosensory notion and the extent of SA are considerably modulated by the subjective feeling of physique possession (Pia et al., 2013; Kilteni and Ehrsson, 2017; Burin et al., 2018; Pyasik et al., 2019, 2021; Ataka et al., 2022). Particularly, a lower in somatosensory sensitivity has been linked to elevated hand-disownership (Ataka et al., 2022) and a better sense of possession over one’s physique results in better sensory attenuation phenomenon (Kilteni and Ehrsson, 2017). Consequently, we speculate that the noticed particular person heterogeneity of SA scores could also be attributed to particular person variations in somatosensory threshold, which might point out greater physique possession (BO) in SA + group in comparison with rSA.
Persistently, a unique modulation of the subjective depth for self- and external-generated stimulations was noticed within the two teams. Certainly, within the SA + group the depth ranking of stimuli generated by others strongly decreased within the HDBR place, resulting in the disappearance of the SA phenomenon. Quite the opposite, the reversed SA (rSA) noticed within the majority of members was not modulated by HDBR. As beforehand mentioned, SA + group demonstrated greater SA magnitude and decrease somatosensory threshold, whereas the rSA group confirmed reversed sensory attenuation and better somatosensory threshold. Apparently, earlier proof additionally means that an alteration of vestibular inputs may end up in a decreased sense of BO and in a lowered reliability in exterior references throughout tactile localization (Pavlidou et al., 2018; Ponzo et al., 2018; Unwalla et al., 2021; Gammeri et al., 2022).
Thus, if SA + group is extra delicate to bodily data as instructed by the decrease somatosensory threshold, the noticed disappearance of SA throughout HDBR could also be attributed to the discount of vestibular enter generated by the head-down tilt place. In distinction, if the rSA group rely much less on bodily data as instructed by the upper somatosensory threshold, the reversed sensory attenuation could also be not affected by the vestibular indicators’ discount. These interpretations assist the speculation that vestibular indicators play a key position in self-other distinction (Deroualle and Lopez, 2014; Lenggenhager and Lopez, 2015; Lopez et al., 2015), suggesting that in simulated microgravity the boundaries between self- and externally generated stimuli might be misplaced. Additional investigations ought to discover the connection between somatosensory notion and physique possession, in addition to its interplay with the vestibular system, as a way to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the disappearance of sensory attenuation within the HDBR-other stimulations situation.
Implications for area analysis
Taken collectively, these findings counsel that modulation of vestibular enter by short-period HDBR has an influence on how we course of somatosensory data, notably when sensory attenuation happens. In area, the neurosensory response to microgravity results in advanced disorientation and movement illness [i.e., Space Adaptation Syndrome and Space Motion Sickness; (Clément and Reschke, 2008; Wood et al., 2011; Clément et al., 2013)] within the early phases of spaceflight. Inside a number of days, most sensorimotor impairments resolve, however might reappear upon return to Earth, each after lengthy and shorter area missions (Reschke, 1990; Paloski et al., 1993; Wooden et al., 2015; Reschke et al., 2018). Importantly, delicate disturbances in somatosensory cognition should still be current within the later phases of the spaceflight, which, if unrecognized, might considerably impair the crew efficiency. Specifically, throughout area missions, altered somatosensory notion of externally generated stimuli because of lowered vestibular inputs might lead to lowered notion of 1’s physique boundaries, affecting dexterity, motor efficiency, and finally rising the chance of accidents and errors throughout crucial operations. Given the technical limitation of medical interventions in area environments, undetected somatosensory signaling impairment in astronauts might delay the detection of diseases and intrude with bold long-term area missions. Though the proof on how microgravity or simulated microgravity may have an effect on somatosensory features continues to be scant and controversial, our information might present new perception into the putative results of microgravity on somatosensory cognition of self- and other-generated stimuli.
Limitations and future instructions
Regardless of the fascinating findings reported on this research, there are a number of limitations that should be acknowledged. Firstly, a lot of the revealed research on the consequences of vestibular enter modulation on somatosensory processing have been carried out utilizing totally different methods apart from microgravity or simulated microgravity, which could have an effect on the vestibular system in several methods. As well as, most HDBR research have used long-term protocols, lasting greater than 7 days, in sharp distinction to our research, which employed a short-term protocol lasting roughly 30 min. Though there’s proof suggesting that electrocortical exercise is comparatively unaffected by protocol length (Brauns et al., 2021), it’s value noting that no prior analysis has particularly examined the affect of HDBR length on somatosensory notion utilizing behavioral duties. Subsequently, to validate the present findings and assist their generalization to spaceflight circumstances, future long-term HDBR research have to be carried out. Secondly, we didn’t management for the person diploma of physique possession and specific ache notion, which can have influenced the noticed outcomes. In reality, though there’s proof on the connection between somatosensory threshold, the extent of physique possession, somatosensory sensation, and the magnitude of sensory attenuation, this interplay was not managed for within the present research. Moreover, it’s essential to contemplate that in our research all members had been blindfolded and we can not dismiss the potential of an extra impact ensuing from visible deprivation. On one hand, earlier analysis signifies that the absence of imaginative and prescient might have an effect on somatosensory notion, producing elevated activation of vestibular and somatosensory areas (Marx et al., 2003, 2004). However, the enrichment of multisensory processing by including visible data, might facilitate the excellence between self-generated stimuli and stimuli generated by others. Consequently, the exact extent to which these variables influenced the noticed outcomes stays to be decided. Lastly, the shortage of neuroimaging information to assist our interpretations is one other limitation of this research. Though we interpreted the noticed modulation of somatosensory notion in response to HDBR based mostly on prior neurophysiological proof, it’s essential to emphasise that the present proof comes from research using methods and protocols totally different from these used on this particular investigation. Future analysis ought to goal to deal with these limitations and supply extra complete insights into the neurofunctional mechanisms underlying the modulation of somatosensory processing in microgravity environments.
Knowledge availability assertion
The uncooked information supporting the conclusions of this text will likely be made obtainable by the authors, with out undue reservation.
Ethics assertion
The research involving human members had been reviewed and accepted by the Bioethics Committee of the College of Turin. The sufferers/members supplied their written knowledgeable consent to take part on this research.
Creator contributions
RG: investigation, information curation, formal evaluation, writing, reviewing, and visualization. AS and MP: definition, conceptualization, methodology, sources, software program, and validation. EC, CZ, and HS: writing, reviewing, and visualization. LP, DR, and AB: writing and reviewing. RR: definition, conceptualization, writing and reviewing, supervision, and mission administration. All authors contributed to the article and accepted the submitted model.
Funding
This work was supported by the Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (grant quantity RICR_RILO_17_01, RICR_RILO_18_02) and by CRT Basis (grant quantity 2020.0748).
Acknowledgments
We want to thank all members who participated on this research. Our particular because of Prof. Rosalba Rosato for her help with information evaluation and Elisabetta Zanin, Giulia Mete, and Alessia Calcagni for his or her assist with information assortment.
Battle of curiosity
The authors declare that the analysis was carried out within the absence of any business or monetary relationships that could possibly be construed as a possible battle of curiosity.
Writer’s be aware
All claims expressed on this article are solely these of the authors and don’t essentially symbolize these of their affiliated organizations, or these of the writer, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that could be evaluated on this article, or declare that could be made by its producer, will not be assured or endorsed by the writer.
References
Ataka, Okay., Sudo, T., Otaki, R., Suzuki, E., and Izumi, S. (2022). Decreased tactile sensitivity induced by disownership: an observational research using the rubber hand phantasm. Entrance. Syst. Neurosci. 15:802148. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.802148
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Baess, P., Horváth, J., Jacobsen, T., and Schröger, E. (2011). Selective suppression of self-initiated sounds in an auditory stream: An ERP research. Psychophysiology 48, 1276–1283. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01196.x
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Blakemore, S., Wolpert, D., and Frith, C. (1998). Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nat. Neurosci. 1, 635–640.
Google Scholar
Boggio, P., Zaghi, S., Lopes, M., and Fregni, F. (2008). Modulatory results of anodal transcranial direct present stimulation on notion and ache thresholds in wholesome volunteers: Modulation of ache threshold with transcranial direct present stimulation. Eur. J. Neurol. 15, 1124–1130. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02270.x
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Borhani, Okay., Beck, B., and Haggard, P. (2017). Selecting, doing, and controlling: implicit sense of company over somatosensory occasions. Psychol. Sci. 28, 882–893. doi: 10.1177/0956797617697693
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Bottini, G., Paulesu, E., Gandola, M., Loffredo, S., Scarpa, P., Sterzi, R., et al. (2005). Left caloric vestibular stimulation ameliorates proper hemianesthesia. Neurology 65, 1278–1283. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000182398.14088.e8
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Brauns, Okay., Friedl-Werner, A., Maggioni, M., Gunga, H., and Stahn, A. (2021). Head-down tilt place, however not the length of mattress relaxation impacts resting state electrocortical exercise. Entrance. Physiol. 12:638669. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.638669
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Burin, D., Battaglini, A., Pia, L., Falvo, G., Palombella, M., and Salatino, A. (2017). Evaluating intensities and modalities throughout the sensory attenuation paradigm: Preliminary proof. J. Adv. Res. 8, 649–653. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2017.08.001
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Burin, D., Pyasik, M., Ronga, I., Cavallo, M., Salatino, A., and Pia, L. (2018). “So long as that’s my hand, that willed motion is mine”: Timing of company triggered by physique possession. Acutely aware. Cogn. 58, 186–192. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.12.005
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Carriot, J., Mackrous, I., and Cullen, Okay. (2021). Challenges to the vestibular system in area: how the mind responds and adapts to microgravity. Entrance. Neural Circuits 15:760313. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2021.760313
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Cassady, Okay., Koppelmans, V., De Dios, Y., Stepanyan, V., Szecsy, D., Gadd, N., et al. (2016). The Results of Lengthy Length Mattress Relaxation on Mind Purposeful Connectivity and Sensorimotor Functioning. Galveston, TX: NASA.
Google Scholar
Chang, L., Lin, J., Lin, C., Wu, Okay., Wang, Y., and Kuo, C. (2011). Impact of physique place on bilateral EEG alterations and their relationship with autonomic nervous modulation in regular topics. Neurosci. Lett. 490, 96–100. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.12.034
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Clément, G., Boyle, R., George, Okay., Nelson, G., Reschke, M., Williams, T., et al. (2020). Challenges to the central nervous system throughout human spaceflight missions to Mars. J. Neurophysiol. 123, 2037–2063. doi: 10.1152/jn.00476.2019
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Clément, G., Lathan, C., and Lockerd, A. (2008). Notion of depth in microgravity throughout parabolic flight. Acta Astronaut. 63, 828–832.
Google Scholar
Clément, G., and Reschke, M. (2008). Neuroscience in Area. New York, NY: Springer New York.
Google Scholar
Clément, G., Skinner, A., and Lathan, C. (2013). Distance and measurement notion in astronauts throughout long-duration spaceflight. Life 3, 524–537.
Google Scholar
Demertzi, A., Van Ombergen, A., Tomilovskaya, E., Jeurissen, B., Pechenkova, E., Di Perri, C., et al. (2016). Cortical reorganization in an astronaut’s mind after long-duration spaceflight. Mind Struct. Funct. 221, 2873–2876.
Google Scholar
Demir, A., and Aydın, E. (2021). Vestibular illusions and alterations in aerospace setting. Turk. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 59, 139–149.
Google Scholar
Desantis, A., Weiss, C., Schütz-Bosbach, S., and Waszak, F. (2012). Believing and perceiving: authorship perception modulates sensory attenuation. PLoS One 7:e37959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037959
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Dogge, M., Hofman, D., Custers, R., and Aarts, H. (2019). Exploring the position of motor and non-motor predictive mechanisms in sensory attenuation: Perceptual and neurophysiological findings. Neuropsychologia 124, 216–225. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.12.007
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Ferrè, E., Sedda, A., Gandola, M., and Bottini, G. (2011b). How the vestibular system modulates tactile notion in regular topics: a behavioural and physiological research. Exp. Mind Res. 208, 29–38. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2450-9
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Ferrè, E., Bottini, G., and Haggard, P. (2011a). Vestibular modulation of somatosensory notion. Eur. J. Neurosci. 34, 1337–1344.
Google Scholar
Ferrè, E., Day, B., Bottini, G., and Haggard, P. (2013b). How the vestibular system interacts with somatosensory notion: A sham-controlled research with galvanic vestibular stimulation. Neurosci. Lett. 550, 35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.06.046
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Ferrè, E., Bottini, G., Iannetti, G., and Haggard, P. (2013a). The steadiness of emotions: Vestibular modulation of bodily sensations. Cortex 49, 748–758. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.01.012
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Ferrè, E., Vagnoni, E., and Haggard, P. (2013c). Vestibular contributions to bodily consciousness. Neuropsychologia 51, 1445–1452.
Google Scholar
Ferrè, E., Walther, L., and Haggard, P. (2015). Multisensory interactions between vestibular. visible and somatosensory indicators. Holmes NP, editor. PLoS One 10, e0124573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124573
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Fossataro, C., Bucchioni, G., D’Agata, F., Bruno, V., Morese, R., Krystkowiak, P., et al. (2018). Anxiousness-dependent modulation of motor responses to ache expectancy. Soc. Cogn. Have an effect on. Neurosci. 13, 321–330. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx146
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Freeman, W. (2000). A neurobiological interpretation of semiotics: that means, illustration, and knowledge. Inf. Sci. 124, 93–102.
Google Scholar
Gammeri, R., Léonard, J., Toupet, M., Hautefort, C., van Nechel, C., Besnard, S., et al. (2022). Navigation methods in sufferers with vestibular loss examined in a digital actuality T-maze. J. Neurol. 269, 4333–4348. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11069-z
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Inexperienced, A., Shaikh, A., and Angelaki, D. (2005). Sensory vestibular contributions to developing inside fashions of self-motion. J. Neural Eng. 2, S164–S179. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/2/3/S02
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Grouper, H., Eisenberg, E., and Pud, D. (2021). Extra Perception on the Function of Persona Traits and Sensitivity to Experimental Ache. J. Ache Res. 14, 1837–1844. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S309729
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Han, N., Jack, B., Hughes, G., and Whitford, T. (2022). The position of motion–impact contingency on sensory attenuation within the absence of motion. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 34, 1488–1499. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01867
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Karmali, F., and Shelhamer, M. (2008). The dynamics of parabolic flight: Flight traits and passenger percepts. Acta Astronaut. 63, 594–602. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2008.04.009
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Kearney, J., and Brittain, J. (2021). Sensory Attenuation in Sport and Rehabilitation: Perspective from Analysis in Parkinson’s Illness. Mind Sci. 11:580. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11050580
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Kerkhoff, G., Hildebrandt, H., Reinhart, S., Kardinal, M., Dimova, V., and Utz, Okay. S. (2011). A protracted-lasting enchancment of tactile extinction after galvanic vestibular stimulation: Two Sham-stimulation managed case research. Neuropsychologia 49, 186–195. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.014
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Kiepe, F., Kraus, N., and Hesselmann, G. (2021). Sensory attenuation within the auditory modality as a window into predictive processing. Entrance. Hum. Neurosci. 15:704668. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.704668
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Kilteni, Okay., and Ehrsson, H. (2017). Physique possession determines the attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114, 8426–8431. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703347114
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Kilteni, Okay., and Ehrsson, H. (2020). Purposeful connectivity between the cerebellum and somatosensory areas implements the attenuation of self-generated contact. J. Neurosci. 40, 894–906. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1732-19.2019
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Lenggenhager, B., and Lopez, C. (2015). “Vestibular Contributions to the Sense of Physique, Self, and OthersVestibular Contributions to the Sense of Physique, Self, and Others,” in Open MIND, eds T. Metzinger and J. M. Windt (Bengaluru: MIND Group).
Google Scholar
Liao, Y., Lei, M., Huang, H., Wang, C., Duan, J., Li, H., et al. (2015). The time course of altered mind exercise throughout 7-day simulated microgravity. Entrance. Behav. Neurosci. 9:124. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00124
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Lopez, C., and Blanke, O. (2011). The thalamocortical vestibular system in animals and people. Mind Res. Rev. 67, 119–146.
Google Scholar
Lopez, C., Blanke, O., and Mast, F. (2012). The human vestibular cortex revealed by coordinate-based activation probability estimation meta-analysis. Neuroscience 212, 159–179. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.03.028
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Lopez, C., Falconer, C., Deroualle, D., and Mast, F. (2015). Within the presence of others: Self-location, steadiness management and vestibular processing. Neurophysiol. Clin. Neurophysiol. 45, 241–254. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2015.09.001
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Marx, E., Deutschländer, A., Stephan, T., Dieterich, M., Wiesmann, M., and Brandt, T. (2004). Eyes open and eyes closed as relaxation circumstances: influence on mind activation patterns. NeuroImage 21, 1818–1824.
Google Scholar
Marx, E., Stephan, T., Nolte, A., Deutschländer, A., Seelos, Okay., Dieterich, M., et al. (2003). Eye closure in darkness animates sensory programs. NeuroImage 19, 924–934. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00150-2
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
McGeoch, P., Williams, L., Lee, R., and Ramachandran, V. (2008). Behavioural proof for vestibular stimulation as a remedy for central post-stroke ache. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 79, 1298–1301.
Google Scholar
McGeoch, P., Williams, L., Tune, T., Lee, R., Huang, M., and Ramachandran, V. (2009). Submit-stroke tactile allodynia and its modulation by vestibular stimulation: a MEG case research. Acta Neurol. Scand. 119, 404–409. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01106.x
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
McIntyre, J., Berthoz, A., and Lacquaniti, F. (1998). Reference frames and inside fashions for visuo-manual coordination: what can we be taught from microgravity experiments? Mind Res. Rev. 28, 143–154. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00034-4
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Mekari, S., Murphy, R., MacKinnon, A., Hollohan, Q., Macdougall, S., Courish, M., et al. (2022). The influence of a short-period head-down tilt on government perform in youthful adults. Sci. Rep. 12:20888. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25123-3
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Mennemeier, M., Pierce, C., Chatterjee, A., Anderson, B., Jewell, G., Dowler, R., et al. (2005). Biases in Attentional Orientation and Magnitude Estimation Clarify Crossover: Neglect is a Dysfunction of Each. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 1194–1211. doi: 10.1162/0898929055002454
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Miall, R., and Wolpert, D. (1996). Ahead fashions for physiological motor management. Neural Netw. 9, 1265–1279.
Google Scholar
Moro, S., and Harris, L. (2018). Vestibular–somatosensory interactions have an effect on the perceived timing of tactile stimuli. Exp. Mind Res. 236, 2877–2885. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5346-8
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Ngo, T., Barsdell, W., Arnold, C., Chou, M., New, P., Hill, S., et al. (2015). Bedside neuromodulation of persistent ache and allodynia utilizing caloric vestibular stimulation: an effectiveness trial. J. Neurol. Sci. 357, e91.
Google Scholar
Oldfield, R. (1971). The evaluation and evaluation of handedness: The Edinburgh stock. Neuropsychologia 9, 97–113.
Google Scholar
Paloski, W., Black, F., Reschke, M., Calkins, D., and Shupert, C. (1993). Vestibular ataxia following shuttle flights: results of microgravity on otolith-mediated sensorimotor management of posture. Am. J. Otol. 14, 9–17.
PubMed Summary | Google Scholar
Pavlidou, A., Ferrè, E., and Lopez, C. (2018). Vestibular stimulation makes individuals extra selfish. Cortex J. Devoted Research Nerv. Syst. Behav. 101, 302–305. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.12.005
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Pavy-Le Traon, A., Heer, M., Narici, M., Rittweger, J., and Vernikos, J. (2007). From area to Earth: advances in human physiology from 20 years of mattress relaxation research (1986–2006). Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 101, 143–194. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0474-z
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Pia, L., Garbarini, F., Fossataro, C., Fornia, L., and Berti, A. (2013). Ache and physique consciousness: proof from brain-damaged sufferers with delusional physique possession. Entrance. Hum. Neurosci. 7:298. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00298
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Ponzo, S., Kirsch, L., Fotopoulou, A., and Jenkinson, P. (2018). Balancing physique possession: Visible seize of proprioception and affectivity throughout vestibular stimulation. Neuropsychologia 117, 311–321.
Google Scholar
Pyasik, M., Ronga, I., Burin, D., Salatino, A., Sarasso, P., Garbarini, F., et al. (2021). I’m a believer: Illusory self-generated contact elicits sensory attenuation and somatosensory evoked potentials just like the actual self-touch. NeuroImage 229:117727. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117727
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Pyasik, M., Salatino, A., Burin, D., Berti, A., Ricci, R., and Pia, L. (2019). Shared neurocognitive mechanisms of attenuating self-touch and illusory self-touch. Soc. Cogn. Have an effect on. Neurosci. 14, 119–127. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz002
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V., McGeoch, P., Williams, L., and Arcilla, G. (2007). Speedy reduction of thalamic ache syndrome induced by vestibular caloric stimulation. Neurocase 13, 185–188. doi: 10.1080/13554790701450446
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Reschke, M. (1990). Statistical prediction of area movement illness. Galveston, TX: NASA.
Google Scholar
Reznik, D., Henkin, Y., Levy, O., and Mukamel, R. (2015). Perceived loudness of self-generated sounds is differentially modified by anticipated sound depth. PLoS One 10:e0127651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127651
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Ricci, R., Caldano, M., Sabatelli, I., Cirillo, E., Gammeri, R., Cesim, E., et al. (2021). When proper goes left: phantom contact induced by mirror field process in wholesome people. Entrance. Hum. Neurosci. 15:734235. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.734235
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Ricci, R., Salatino, A., Caldano, M., Perozzo, P., Cerrato, P., Pyasik, M., et al. (2019). Phantom contact: Tips on how to unmask sensory unawareness after stroke. Cortex 121, 253–263. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.08.021
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Roberts, D., Asemani, D., Nietert, P., Eckert, M., Inglesby, D., Bloomberg, J., et al. (2019). Extended Microgravity Impacts Human Mind Construction and Operate. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 40, 1878–1885.
Google Scholar
Roberts, D., Ramsey, D., Johnson, Okay., Kola, J., Ricci, R., Hicks, C., et al. (2010). Cerebral Cortex Plasticity After 90 Days of Mattress Relaxation: Knowledge from TMS and fMRI. Aviat. Area Environ. Med. 81, 30–40. doi: 10.3357/asem.2532.2009
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Roberts, D., Zhu, X., Tabesh, A., Duffy, E., Ramsey, D., and Brown, T. (2015). Structural Mind Adjustments following Lengthy-Time period 6° Head-Down Tilt Mattress Relaxation as an Analog for Spaceflight. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 36, 2048–2054. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4406
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Romano, D., Pfeiffer, C., Maravita, A., and Blanke, O. (2014). Illusory self-identification with an avatar reduces arousal responses to painful stimuli. Behav. Mind Res. 261, 275–281. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.12.049
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Salatino, A., Iacono, C., Gammeri, R., Chiadò, S., Lambert, J., Sulcova, D., et al. (2021). Zero gravity induced by parabolic flight enhances automated seize and weakens voluntary upkeep of visuospatial consideration. NPJ Micrograv. 7:29. doi: 10.1038/s41526-021-00159-3
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Schafer, E., and Marcus, M. (1973). Self-stimulation alters human sensory mind responses. Science 181, 175–177.
Google Scholar
Schmidt, L., Keller, I., Utz, Okay., Artinger, F., Stumpf, O., and Kerkhoff, G. (2013). Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Improves Arm Place Sense in Spatial Neglect: A Sham-Stimulation-Managed Research. Neurorehabil. Neural Restore. 27, 497–506. doi: 10.1177/1545968312474117
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Schneider, S., Brümmer, V., Carnahan, H., Dubrowski, A., Askew, C., and Strüder, H. (2008). What occurs to the mind in weightlessness? A primary strategy by EEG tomography. NeuroImage 42, 1316–1323. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.010
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Spironelli, C., and Angrilli, A. (2011). Affect of physique place on cortical pain-related somatosensory processing: an ERP research. PLoS One 6:e24932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024932
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Spironelli, C., and Angrilli, A. (2017). Posture Utilized in fMRI-PET Elicits Decreased Cortical Exercise and Altered Hemispheric Asymmetry with Respect to Sitting Place: An EEG Resting State Research. Entrance. Hum. Neurosci. 11:621. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00621
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Spitoni, G., Pireddu, G., Galati, G., Sulpizio, V., Paolucci, S., and Pizzamiglio, L. (2016). Caloric Vestibular Stimulation Reduces Ache and Somatoparaphrenia in a Extreme Persistent Central Submit-Stroke Ache Affected person: A Case Research. PLoS One 11:e0151213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151213
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Su, Q., Qin, W., Yang, Q., Yu, C., Qian, T., Mouraux, A., et al. (2019). Mind areas preferentially responding to transient and iso-intense painful or tactile stimuli. NeuroImage 192, 52–65.
Google Scholar
Torta, D., Ninghetto, M., Ricci, R., and Legrain, V. (2020). Ranking the Depth of a Laser Stimulus, however Not Attending to Adjustments in Its Location or Depth Modulates the Laser-Evoked Cortical Exercise. Entrance. Hum. Neurosci. 14:120. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00120
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Vaishnavi, S., Calhoun, J., Southwood, M., and Chatterjee, A. (2000). Sensory and response interference by ipsilesional stimuli in tactile extinction. Cortex 36, 81–92. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70838-4
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Vallar, G., Bottini, G., Rusconi, M., and Sterzi, R. (1993). Exploring somatosensory hemineglect by vestibular stimulation. Mind J. Neurol. 116, 71–86. doi: 10.1093/mind/116.1.71
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Vallar, G., Sterzi, R., Bottini, G., Cappa, S., and Rusconi, M. (1990). Non permanent Remission of Left Hemianesthesia after Vestibular Stimulation. A Sensory Neglect Phenomenon. Cortex 26, 123–131. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80078-0
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Van Ombergen, A., Wuyts, F., Jeurissen, B., Sijbers, J., Vanhevel, F., Jillings, S., et al. (2017). Intrinsic purposeful connectivity reduces after first-time publicity to short-term gravitational alterations induced by parabolic flight. Sci. Rep. 7:3061. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03170-5
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Waszak, F., Cardoso-Leite, P., and Hughes, G. (2012). Motion impact anticipation: Neurophysiological foundation and purposeful penalties. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 943–959. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.004
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D., Ade, Okay., Rogers, L., Attix, D., Kuchibhatla, M., Slade, M., et al. (2017). Stopping episodic migraine with caloric vestibular stimulation: a randomized managed trial. Headache 57, 1065–1087. doi: 10.1111/head.13120
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Wooden, S., Loehr, J., and Guilliams, M. (2011). Sensorimotor reconditioning throughout and after spaceflight. Hoffer ME, Balaban CD, editors. NeuroRehabilitation 29, 185–195.
Google Scholar
Wooden, S., Paloski, W., and Clark, J. (2015). Assessing sensorimotor perform following ISS with computerized dynamic posturography. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Carry out. 86, 45–53.
Google Scholar
zu Eulenburg, P., Caspers, S., Roski, C., and Eickhoff, S. (2012). Meta-analytical definition and purposeful connectivity of the human vestibular cortex. NeuroImage 60, 162–169. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.032
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Zupan, L., Merfeld, D., and Darlot, C. (2002). Utilizing sensory weighting to mannequin the affect of canal, otolith and visible cues on spatial orientation and eye actions. Biol. Cybern. 86, 209–230. doi: 10.1007/s00422-001-0290-1
PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar
Adblock take a look at (Why?)