The speech neuroprosthesis – Nature.com

1. Felgoise, S. H., Zaccheo, V., Duff, J. & Simmons, Z. Verbal communication impacts high quality of life in sufferers with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Entrance. Degener. 17, 179–183 (2016).

   Article 

   Google Scholar 

2. Das, J. M., Anosike, Ok. & Asuncion, R. M. D. Locked-in syndrome. StatPearls https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559026/ (StatPearls, 2021).

3. Lulé, D. et al. Life may be value residing in locked-in syndrome. Prog. Mind Res. 177, 339–351 (2009).

   Article 
   PubMed 

   Google Scholar 

4. Pels, E. G. M., Aarnoutse, E. J., Ramsey, N. F. & Vansteensel, M. J. Estimated prevalence of the goal inhabitants for mind–laptop interface neurotechnology within the Netherlands. Neurorehabil. Neural Restore 31, 677–685 (2017).

   Article 
   PubMed 
   PubMed Central 

   Google Scholar 

5. Koch Fager, S., Fried-Oken, M., Jakobs, T. & Beukelman, D. R. New and rising entry applied sciences for adults with complicated communication wants and extreme motor impairments: state of the science. Increase. Altern. Commun. Baltim. MD 1985 35, 13–25 (2019).

   Google Scholar 

6. Vansteensel, M. J. et al. Totally implanted mind–laptop interface in a locked-in affected person with ALS. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 2060–2066 (2016).

   Article 
   PubMed 
   PubMed Central 

   Google Scholar 

7. Utsumi, Ok. et al. Operation of a P300-based mind–laptop interface in sufferers with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Sci. Rep. 8, 1753 (2018).

   Article 
   PubMed 
   PubMed Central 

   Google Scholar 

8. Pandarinath, C. et al. Excessive efficiency communication by individuals with paralysis utilizing an intracortical mind–laptop interface. eLife 6, e18554 (2017).

   Article 
   PubMed 
   PubMed Central 

   Google Scholar 

9. Willett, F. R., Avansino, D. T., Hochberg, L. R., Henderson, J. M. & Shenoy, Ok. V. Excessive-performance brain-to-text communication by way of handwriting. Nature 593, 249–254 (2021).

   Article 
   CAS 
   PubMed 
   PubMed Central 

   Google Scholar 

10. Chang, E. F. & Anumanchipalli, G. Ok. Towards a speech neuroprosthesis. JAMA 323, 413–414 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

11. Bull, P. & Frederikson, L. in Companion Encyclopedia of Psychology (Routledge, 1994).

12. Moses, D. A. et al. Neuroprosthesis for decoding speech in a paralyzed particular person with anarthria. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 217–227 (2021). The authors first demonstrated speech decoding in an individual with vocal-tract paralysis by decoding cortical exercise word-by-word into sentences, utilizing a vocabulary of fifty phrases at a price of 15 wpm.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

13. Angrick, M. et al. On-line speech synthesis utilizing a chronically implanted mind–laptop interface in a person with ALS. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.30.23291352 (2023). The authors demonstrated speech synthesis of single phrases from cortical exercise throughout tried speech in an individual with vocal-tract paralysis.

14. Metzger, S. L. et al. A high-performance neuroprosthesis for speech decoding and avatar management. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06443-4 (2023). The authors reported demonstrations of speech synthesis and avatar animation (orofacial-movement decoding), together with improved text-decoding vocabulary measurement and pace, through the use of connectionist temporal classification loss to coach fashions to map persistent-somatotopic representations on the sensorimotor cortex into sentences throughout silent speech (a big vocabulary was used at a speech price of 78 wpm).

15. Willett, F. R. et al. A high-performance speech neuroprosthesis. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06377-x (2023). The authors improved textual content decoding to an expansive vocabulary measurement at 62 wpm, by coaching fashions with connectionist temporal classification loss to decode sentences from multiunit exercise from microelectrode arrays on precentral gyrus whereas an individual with dysarthria silently tried to talk.

16. Card, N. S. et al. An Correct and Quickly Calibrating Speech Neuroprosthesis https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.26.23300110 (2023). The authors used an analogous method to Willett et al. (2023), demonstrating that doubling the variety of microelectrode arrays within the precentral gyrus additional improved text-decoding accuracy with a price of 33 wpm.

17. Bouchard, Ok. E., Mesgarani, N., Johnson, Ok. & Chang, E. F. Purposeful group of human sensorimotor cortex for speech articulation. Nature 495, 327–332 (2013). Right here, the authors demonstrated the dynamics of somatotopic group and speech-articulator representations for the jaw, lips, tongue and larynx throughout manufacturing of syllables, straight connecting phonetic manufacturing with speech-motor management of vocal-tract actions.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

18. Carey, D., Krishnan, S., Callaghan, M. F., Sereno, M. I. & Dick, F. Purposeful and quantitative MRI mapping of somatomotor representations of human supralaryngeal vocal tract. Cereb. Cortex N. Y. N. 1991 27, 265–278 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

19. Ludlow, C. L. Central nervous system management of the laryngeal muscle groups in people. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 147, 205–222 (2005).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

20. Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. Articulatory gestures as phonological items. Phonology 6, 201–251 (1989).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

21. Ladefoged, P. & Johnson, Ok. A Course in Phonetics (Cengage Studying, 2014).

22. Berry, J. J. Accuracy of the NDI wave speech analysis system. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 54, 1295–1301 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

23. Liu, P. et al. A deep recurrent method for acoustic-to-articulatory inversion. In 2015 IEEE Worldwide Conf. Acoustics, Speech and Sign Processing (ICASSP) https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2015.7178812 (2015).

24. Chartier, J., Anumanchipalli, G. Ok., Johnson, Ok. & Chang, E. F. Encoding of articulatory kinematic trajectories in human speech sensorimotor cortex. Neuron 98, 1042–1054.e4 (2018). The authors demonstrated that, throughout steady speech in ready audio system, cortical exercise on the ventral sensorimotor cortex encodes coordinated kinematic trajectories of speech articulators and provides rise to a low-dimensional illustration of consonants and vowels.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

25. Illa, A. & Ghosh, P. Ok. Illustration studying utilizing convolution neural community for acoustic-to-articulatory inversion. In ICASSP 2019 — 2019 IEEE Worldwide Conf. Acoustics, Speech and Sign Processing (ICASSP) https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8682506 (2019).

26. Shahrebabaki, A. S., Salvi, G., Svendsen, T. & Siniscalchi, S. M. Acoustic-to-articulatory mapping with joint optimization of deep speech enhancement and articulatory inversion fashions. IEEEACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Course of. 30, 135–147 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

27. Tychtl, Z. & Psutka, J. Speech manufacturing based mostly on the mel-frequency cepstral coefficients. In sixth European Conf. Speech Communication and Know-how (Eurospeech 1999) https://doi.org/10.21437/Eurospeech.1999-510 (ISCA, 1999).

28. Belyk, M. & Brown, S. The origins of the vocal mind in people. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 77, 177–193 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

29. Simonyan, Ok. & Horwitz, B. Laryngeal motor cortex and management of speech in people. Neuroscientist 17, 197–208 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

30. McCawley, J. D. in Tone (ed. Fromkin, V. A.) 113–131 (Educational, 1978).

31. Murray, I. R. & Arnott, J. L. Towards the simulation of emotion in artificial speech: a assessment of the literature on human vocal emotion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 1097–1108 (1993).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

32. Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. The Sound Sample of English (Harper, 1968).

33. Baddeley, A. Working Reminiscence xi, 289 (Clarendon/Oxford Univ. Press, 1986).

34. Penfield, W. & Boldrey, E. Somatic motor and sensory illustration within the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Mind 60, 389–443 (1937). The authors demonstrated proof of somatotopy on sensorimotor cortex by localizing cortical-stimulation-induced motion and sensation for particular person muscle teams.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

35. Penfield, W. & Roberts, L. Speech and Mind-Mechanisms (Princeton Univ. Press, 1959). This research supplied insights into cortical management of speech and language by neurosurgical instances, together with cortical resection, direct-cortical stimulation and seizure mapping.

36. Cushing, H. A observe upon the Faradic stimulation of the postcentral gyrus in aware sufferers. Mind 32, 44–53 (1909). This research was one of many first that utilized direct-cortical stimulation to localize perform on the sensorimotor cortex.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

37. Roux, F.-E., Niare, M., Charni, S., Giussani, C. & Durand, J.-B. Purposeful structure of the motor homunculus detected by electrostimulation. J. Physiol. 598, 5487–5504 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

38. Jensen, M. A. et al. A motor affiliation space within the depths of the central sulcus. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 1165–1169 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

39. Eichert, N., Papp, D., Mars, R. B. & Watkins, Ok. E. Mapping human laryngeal motor cortex throughout vocalization. Cereb. Cortex 30, 6254–6269 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

40. Umeda, T., Isa, T. & Nishimura, Y. The somatosensory cortex receives details about motor output. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw5388 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

41. Murray, E. A. & Coulter, J. D. Group of corticospinal neurons within the monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 195, 339–365 (1981).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

42. Arce, F. I., Lee, J.-C., Ross, C. F., Sessle, B. J. & Hatsopoulos, N. G. Directional info from neuronal ensembles within the primate orofacial sensorimotor cortex. Am. J. Physiol. Coronary heart Circ. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00144.2013 (2013).

43. Mugler, E. M. et al. Differential illustration of articulatory gestures and phonemes in precentral and inferior frontal gyri. J. Neurosci. 4653, 1206–1218 (2018). The authors demonstrated that the ventral sensorimotor cortex, not Broca’s space within the inferior frontal gyrus, finest represents speech-articulatory gestures.

    Google Scholar 

44. Dichter, B. Ok., Breshears, J. D., Leonard, M. Ok. & Chang, E. F. The management of vocal pitch in human laryngeal motor cortex. Cell 174, 21–31.e9 (2018). The authors uncovered the causal position of the dorsal laryngeal motor cortex in controlling vocal pitch by feedforward motor instructions, in addition to further auditory properties.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

45. Belyk, M., Eichert, N. & McGettigan, C. A twin larynx motor networks speculation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200392 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

46. Lu, J. et al. Neural management of lexical tone manufacturing in human laryngeal motor cortex. Nat. Commun. 14, 6917 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

47. Silva, A. B. et al. A neurosurgical useful dissection of the center precentral gyrus throughout speech manufacturing. J. Neurosci. 42, 8416–8426 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

48. Itabashi, R. et al. Harm to the left precentral gyrus is related to apraxia of speech in acute stroke. Stroke 47, 31–36 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

49. Chang, E. F. et al. Pure apraxia of speech after resection based mostly within the posterior center frontal gyrus. Neurosurgery 87, E383–E389 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

50. Levy, D. F. et al. Apraxia of speech with phonological alexia and agraphia following resection of the left center precentral gyrus: illustrative case. J. Neurosurg. Case Classes 5, CASE22504 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

51. Willett, F. R. et al. Hand knob space of premotor cortex represents the entire physique in a compositional means. Cell 181, 396–409.e26 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

52. Stavisky, S. D. et al. Neural ensemble dynamics in dorsal motor cortex throughout speech in individuals with paralysis. eLife 8, e46015 (2019). The authors demonstrated that, at single areas on the dorsal precentral gyrus (hand space), neurons are tuned to actions of every key speech articulator.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

53. Venezia, J. H., Thurman, S. M., Richards, V. M. & Hickok, G. Hierarchy of speech-driven spectrotemporal receptive fields in human auditory cortex. NeuroImage 186, 647–666 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

54. Mesgarani, N., Cheung, C., Johnson, Ok. & Chang, E. F. Phonetic function encoding in human superior temporal gyrus. Science 343, 1006–1010 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

55. Akbari, H., Khalighinejad, B., Herrero, J. L., Mehta, A. D. & Mesgarani, N. In direction of reconstructing intelligible speech from the human auditory cortex. Sci. Rep. 9, 874 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

56. Pasley, B. N. et al. Reconstructing speech from human auditory cortex. PLOS Biol. 10, e1001251 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

57. Binder, J. R. The Wernicke space. Neurology 85, 2170–2175 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

58. Binder, J. R. Present controversies on Wernicke’s space and its position in language. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 17, 58 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

59. Martin, S. et al. Phrase pair classification throughout imagined speech utilizing direct mind recordings. Sci. Rep. 6, 25803 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

60. Pei, X., Barbour, D., Leuthardt, E. C. & Schalk, G. Decoding vowels and consonants in spoken and imagined phrases utilizing electrocorticographic alerts in people. J. Neural Eng. 8, 046028 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

61. Martin, S. et al. Decoding spectrotemporal options of overt and covert speech from the human cortex. Entrance. Neuroeng. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2014.00014 (2014).

62. Proix, T. et al. Imagined speech may be decoded from low- and cross-frequency intracranial EEG options. Nat. Commun. 13, 48 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

63. Simanova, I., Hagoort, P., Oostenveld, R. & van Gerven, M. A. J. Modality-independent decoding of semantic info from the human mind. Cereb. Cortex 24, 426–434 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

64. Wandelt, S. Ok. et al. On-line inside speech decoding from single neurons in a human participant. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.02.22281775 (2022). The authors decoded neuronal exercise from a microelectrode array within the supramarginal gyrus right into a set of eight phrases whereas the participant of their research imagined talking.

65. Acharya, A. B. & Maani, C. V. Conduction aphasia. StatPearls https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537006/ (StatPearls, 2023).

66. Worth, C. J., Moore, C. J., Humphreys, G. W. & Smart, R. J. Segregating semantic from phonological processes throughout studying. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9, 727–733 (1997).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

67. Huth, A. G., de Heer, W. A., Griffiths, T. L., Theunissen, F. E. & Gallant, J. L. Pure speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. Nature 532, 453–458 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

68. Tang, J., LeBel, A., Jain, S. & Huth, A. G. Semantic reconstruction of steady language from non-invasive mind recordings. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 858–866 (2023). The authors developed an method to decode useful MRI exercise throughout imagined speech into sentences with preserved semantic which means, though word-by-word accuracy was restricted.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

69. Andrews, J. P. et al. Dissociation of Broca’s space from Broca’s aphasia in sufferers present process neurosurgical resections. J. Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.6.JNS2297 (2022).

70. Mohr, J. P. et al. Broca aphasia: pathologic and medical. Neurology 28, 311–324 (1978).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

71. Matchin, W. & Hickok, G. The cortical group of syntax. Cereb. Cortex 30, 1481–1498 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

72. Chang, E. F., Kurteff, G. & Wilson, S. M. Selective interference with syntactic encoding throughout sentence manufacturing by direct electrocortical stimulation of the inferior frontal gyrus. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 30, 411–420 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

73. Thukral, A., Ershad, F., Enan, N., Rao, Z. & Yu, C. Smooth ultrathin silicon electronics for tender neural interfaces: a assessment of latest advances of soppy neural interfaces based mostly on ultrathin silicon. IEEE Nanotechnol. Magazine. 12, 21–34 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

74. Chow, M. S. M., Wu, S. L., Webb, S. E., Gluskin, Ok. & Yew, D. T. Purposeful magnetic resonance imaging and the mind: a quick assessment. World J. Radiol. 9, 5–9 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

75. Panachakel, J. T. & Ramakrishnan, A. G. Decoding covert speech from EEG — a complete assessment. Entrance. Neurosci. 15, 642251 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

76. Lopez-Bernal, D., Balderas, D., Ponce, P. & Molina, A. A state-of-the-art assessment of EEG-based imagined speech decoding. Entrance. Hum. Neurosci. 16, 867281 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

77. Rabut, C. et al. A window to the mind: ultrasound imaging of human neural exercise by a everlasting acoustic window. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.14.544094 (2023).

78. Kwon, J., Shin, J. & Im, C.-H. Towards a compact hybrid mind–laptop interface (BCI): efficiency analysis of multi-class hybrid EEG-fNIRS BCIs with restricted variety of channels. PLOS ONE 15, e0230491 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

79. Wittevrongel, B. et al. Optically pumped magnetometers for sensible MEG-based mind–laptop interfacing. In Mind–Pc Interface Analysis: A State-of-the-Artwork Abstract 10 (eds Guger, C., Allison, B. Z. & Gunduz, A.) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79287-9_4 (Springer Worldwide, 2021).

80. Zheng, H. et al. The emergence of useful ultrasound for noninvasive mind–laptop interface. Analysis 6, 0200 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

81. Fernández-de Thomas, R. J., Munakomi, S. & De Jesus, O. Craniotomy. StatPearls https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560922/ (StatPearls, 2024).

82. Parvizi, J. & Kastner, S. Guarantees and limitations of human intracranial electroencephalography. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 474–483 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

83. Rubin, D. B. et al. Interim security profile from the feasibility research of the BrainGate Neural Interface system. Neurology 100, e1177–e1192 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

84. Guenther, F. H. et al. A wi-fi mind–machine interface for real-time speech synthesis. PLoS ONE 4, e8218 (2009). The authors demonstrated above-chance on-line synthesis of formants, however not phrases or sentences, from neural exercise recorded with an intracortical neurotrophic microelectrode within the precentral gyrus of a person with anarthria.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

85. Brumberg, J., Wright, E., Andreasen, D., Guenther, F. & Kennedy, P. Classification of supposed phoneme manufacturing from power intracortical microelectrode recordings in speech motor cortex. Entrance. Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2011.00065 (2011). In a follow-up research to Guenther et al. (2009), the authors demonstrated the above-chance classification accuracy of phonemes.

86. Ray, S. & Maunsell, J. H. R. Completely different origins of gamma rhythm and high-gamma exercise in macaque visible cortex. PLOS Biol. 9, e1000610 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

87. Ray, S., Crone, N. E., Niebur, E., Franaszczuk, P. J. & Hsiao, S. S. Neural correlates of high-gamma oscillations (60–200 Hz) in macaque native area potentials and their potential implications in electrocorticography. J. Neurosci. 28, 11526–11536 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

88. Crone, N. E., Boatman, D., Gordon, B. & Hao, L. Induced electrocorticographic gamma exercise throughout auditory notion. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112, 565–582 (2001).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

89. Crone, N. E., Miglioretti, D. L., Gordon, B. & Lesser, R. P. Purposeful mapping of human sensorimotor cortex with electrocorticographic spectral evaluation. II. Occasion-related synchronization gamma band. Mind 121, 2301–2315 (1998).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

90. Vakani, R. & Nair, D. R. in Handbook of Medical Neurology Vol. 160 (eds Levin, Ok. H. & Chauvel, P.) Ch. 20, 313–327 (Elsevier, 2019).

91. Lee, A. T. et al. Trendy intracranial electroencephalography for epilepsy localization with mixed subdural grid and depth electrodes with low and improved hemorrhagic complication charges. J. Neurosurg. 1, 1–7 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

92. Nair, D. R. et al. 9-year potential efficacy and security of brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal epilepsy. Neurology 95, e1244–e1256 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

93. Degenhart, A. D. et al. Histological analysis of a chronically-implanted electrocorticographic electrode grid in a non-human primate. J. Neural Eng. 13, 046019 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

94. Silversmith, D. B. et al. Plug-and-play management of a mind–laptop interface by neural map stabilization. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 326–335 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

95. Luo, S. et al. Steady decoding from a speech BCI allows management for a person with ALS with out recalibration for 3 months. Adv. Sci. Weinh. Baden-Wurtt. Ger. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202304853 (2023). The authors demonstrated stability of electrocorticography-based speech decoding in an individual with dysarthria by displaying that, regardless of not re-training a mannequin over the course of months, efficiency didn’t drop off.

96. Nordhausen, C. T., Maynard, E. M. & Normann, R. A. Single unit recording capabilities of a 100 microelectrode array. Mind Res. 726, 129–140 (1996).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

97. Normann, R. A. & Fernandez, E. Medical purposes of penetrating neural interfaces and Utah Electrode Array applied sciences. J. Neural Eng. 13, 061003 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

98. Wilson, G. H. et al. Decoding spoken English from intracortical electrode arrays in dorsal precentral gyrus. J. Neural Eng. 17, 066007 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

99. Patel, P. R. et al. Utah array characterization and histological evaluation of a multi-year implant in non-human primate motor and sensory cortices. J. Neural Eng. 20, 014001 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

100. Barrese, J. C. et al. Failure mode evaluation of silicon-based intracortical microelectrode arrays in non-human primates. J. Neural Eng. 10, 066014 (2013).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

101. Woeppel, Ok. et al. Explant evaluation of Utah electrode arrays implanted in human cortex for mind–computer-interfaces. Entrance. Bioeng. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.759711 (2021).

102. Wilson, G. H. et al. Lengthy-term unsupervised recalibration of cursor BCIs. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.03.527022 (2023).

103. Degenhart, A. D. et al. Stabilization of a mind–laptop interface by way of the alignment of low-dimensional areas of neural exercise. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 672–685 (2020).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

104. Karpowicz, B. M. et al. Stabilizing mind–laptop interfaces by alignment of latent dynamics. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.06.487388 (2022).

105. Fan, C. et al. Plug-and-play stability for intracortical mind–laptop interfaces: a one-year demonstration of seamless brain-to-text communication. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.03611 (2023).

106. Herff, C. et al. Mind-to-text: decoding spoken phrases from telephone representations within the mind. Entrance. Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00217 (2015). The authors demonstrated that sequences of phonemes may be decoded from cortical exercise in ready audio system and assembled into sentences utilizing language fashions, albeit with excessive error charges on elevated vocabulary sizes.

107. Mugler, E. M. et al. Direct classification of all American English phonemes utilizing alerts from useful speech motor cortex. J. Neural Eng. 11, 035015 (2014). The authors demonstrated that each one English phonemes may be decoded from cortical exercise of ready audio system.

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

108. Makin, J. G., Moses, D. A. & Chang, E. F. Machine translation of cortical exercise to textual content with an encoder–decoder framework. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 575–582 (2020). The authors developed a recurrent neural community-based method to decode cortical exercise from ready audio system word-by-word into sentences, with phrase error charges as little as 3%.

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

109. Solar, P., Anumanchipalli, G. Ok. & Chang, E. F. Brain2Char: a deep structure for decoding textual content from mind recordings. J. Neural Eng. 17, 066015 (2020). The authors skilled a recurrent neural community with connectionist temporal classification loss to decode cortical exercise from ready audio system into sequences of characters, which had been then constructed into sentences utilizing language fashions, reaching phrase error charges as little as 7% with an over 1,000-word vocabulary.

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

110. Anumanchipalli, G. Ok., Chartier, J. & Chang, E. F. Speech synthesis from neural decoding of spoken sentences. Nature 568, 493–498 (2019). The authors developed a biomimetic method to synthesize full sentences from cortical exercise in ready audio system: articulatory kinematics had been first decoded from cortical exercise and an acoustic waveform was subsequently synthesized from this intermediate illustration.

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

111. Angrick, M. et al. Speech synthesis from ECoG utilizing densely related 3D convolutional neural networks. J. Neural Eng. 16, 036019 (2019). The authors developed a neural-network-based method to synthesize single phrases from cortical exercise in ready audio system.

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

112. Herff, C. et al. Producing pure, intelligible speech from mind exercise in motor, premotor, and inferior frontal cortices. Entrance. Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01267 (2019). The authors developed a concatenative speech-synthesis method for single phrases in wholesome audio system, tailor-made to limited-sized datasets.

113. Salari, E. et al. Classification of articulator actions and motion course from sensorimotor cortex exercise. Sci. Rep. 9, 14165 (2019).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

114. Salari, E., Freudenburg, Z. V., Vansteensel, M. J. & Ramsey, N. F. Classification of facial expressions for supposed show of feelings utilizing mind–laptop interfaces. Ann. Neurol. 88, 631–636 (2020).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

115. Berezutskaya, J. et al. Direct speech reconstruction from sensorimotor mind exercise with optimized deep studying fashions. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.02.502503 (2022).

116. Martin, S. et al. Decoding inside speech utilizing electrocorticography: progress and challenges towards a speech prosthesis. Entrance. Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00422 (2018).

117. Moses, D. A., Leonard, M. Ok., Makin, J. G. & Chang, E. F. Actual-time decoding of question-and-answer speech dialogue utilizing human cortical exercise. Nat. Commun. 10, 3096 (2019).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

118. Ramsey, N. F. et al. Decoding spoken phonemes from sensorimotor cortex with high-density ECoG grids. NeuroImage 180, 301–311 (2018).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

119. Graves, A., Fernández, S., Gomez, F. & Schmidhuber, J. Connectionist temporal classification: labelling unsegmented sequence knowledge with recurrent neural networks. In Proc. twenty third Int. Conf. Machine Studying — ICML ’06 https://doi.org/10.1145/1143844.1143891 (ACM Press, 2006).

120. Metzger, S. L. et al. Generalizable spelling utilizing a speech neuroprosthesis in a person with extreme limb and vocal paralysis. Nat. Commun. 13, 6510 (2022).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

121. Pandarinath, C. et al. Latent components and dynamics in motor cortex and their utility to mind–machine interfaces. J. Neurosci. 38, 9390–9401 (2018).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

122. Parrell, B. & Houde, J. Modeling the position of sensory suggestions in speech motor management and studying. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 62, 2963–2985 (2019).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

123. Houde, J. & Nagarajan, S. Speech manufacturing as state suggestions management. Entrance. Hum. Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00082 (2011).

124. Sitaram, R. et al. Closed-loop mind coaching: the science of neurofeedback. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 86–100 (2017).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

125. Wairagkar, M., Hochberg, L. R., Brandman, D. M. & Stavisky, S. D. Synthesizing speech by decoding intracortical neural exercise from dorsal motor cortex. In 2023 eleventh Int. IEEE/EMBS Conf. Neural Engineering (NER) https://doi.org/10.1109/NER52421.2023.10123880 (IEEE, 2023).

126. Casanova, E. et al. YourTTS: in the direction of zero-shot multi-speaker TTS and zero-shot voice conversion for everybody. In Proc. thirty ninth Int. Conf. Machine Studying (eds Chaudhuri, Ok. et al.) Vol. 162, 2709–2720 (PMLR, 2022).

127. Peters, B., O’Brien, Ok. & Fried-Oken, M. A latest survey of augmentative and different communication use and repair supply experiences of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in america. Disabil. Rehabil. Help. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2149866 (2022).

128. Wu, P., Watanabe, S., Goldstein, L., Black, A. W. & Anumanchipalli, G. Ok. Deep speech synthesis from articulatory representations. In Proc. Interspeech 2022, 779–783 (2022). https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2022-10892.

129. Cho, C. J., Wu, P., Mohamed, A. & Anumanchipalli, G. Ok. Proof of vocal tract articulation in self-supervised studying of speech. In ICASSP 2023 — 2023 IEEE Worldwide Convention on Acoustics, Speech and Sign Processing (ICASSP) (IEEE, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp49357.2023.10094711.

130. Mehrabian, A. Silent Messages: Implicit Communication of Feelings and Attitudes (Wadsworth, 1981).

131. Jia, J., Wang, X., Wu, Z., Cai, L. & Meng, H. Modeling the correlation between modality semantics and facial expressions. In Proc. 2012 Asia Pacific Sign and Data Processing Affiliation Annual Summit and Convention 1–10 (2012).

132. Sumby, W. H. & Pollack, I. Visible contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 26, 212–215 (1954).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

133. Branco, M. P. et al. Mind–laptop interfaces for communication: preferences of people with locked-in syndrome. Neurorehabil. Neural Restore. 35, 267–279 (2021).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

134. Patterson, J. R. & Grabois, M. Locked-in syndrome: a assessment of 139 instances. Stroke 17, 758–764 (1986).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

135. Tomik, B. & Guiloff, R. J. Dysarthria in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a assessment. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 11, 4–15 (2010).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

136. Thomas, T. M. et al. Decoding articulatory and phonetic parts of naturalistic steady speech from the distributed language community. J. Neural Eng. 20, 046030 (2023).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

137. Flinker, A. et al. Redefining the position of Broca’s space in speech. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 2871–2875 (2015).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

138. Cogan, G. B. et al. Sensory–motor transformations for speech happen bilaterally. Nature 507, 94–98 (2014).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

139. Rainey, S., Martin, S., Christen, A. & Mégevand, P. & Fourneret, E. Mind recording, mind-reading, and neurotechnology: moral points from client gadgets to brain-based speech decoding. Sci. Eng. Ethics 26, 2295–2311 (2020).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

140. Nip, I. & Roth, C. R. in Encyclopedia of Medical Neuropsychology (eds Kreutzer, J., DeLuca, J. & Caplan, B.) (Springer Worldwide, 2017).

141. Xiong, W. et al. Towards human parity in conversational speech recognition. IEEEACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Course of. 25, 2410–2423 (2017).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

142. Munteanu, C., Penn, G., Baecker, R., Toms, E. & James, D. Measuring the appropriate phrase error price of machine-generated webcast transcripts. In Interspeech 2006 https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2006-40 (2006).

143. Panayotov, V., Chen, G., Povey, D. & Khudanpur, S. Librispeech: an ASR corpus based mostly on public area audio books. In 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech and Sign Processing (ICASSP) https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2015.7178964 (IEEE, 2015).

144. Godfrey, J. J., Holliman, E. C. & McDaniel, J. SWITCHBOARD: phone speech corpus for analysis and growth. In Proc. ICASSP-92: 1992 IEEE Worldwide Convention on Acoustics, Speech, and Sign Processing Vol. 1, 517–520 (1992).

145. OpenAI. GPT-4 Technical Report. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774 (2023).

146. Trnka, Ok., Yarrington, D., McCaw, J., McCoy, Ok. F. & Pennington, C. The consequences of phrase prediction on communication price for AAC. In Human Language Applied sciences 2007: The Convention of the North American Chapter of the Affiliation for Computational Linguistics; Companion Quantity, Brief Papers 173–176 (Affiliation for Computational Linguistics, 2007).

147. Venkatagiri, H. Impact of window measurement on price of communication in a lexical prediction AAC system. Increase. Altern. Commun. 10, 105–112 (1994).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

148. Trnka, Ok., Mccaw, J., Mccoy, Ok. & Pennington, C. in Human Language Applied sciences 2007 173–176 (2008).

149. Kayte, S. N., Mal, M., Gaikwad, S. & Gawali, B. Efficiency analysis of speech synthesis methods for English language. In Proc. Int. Congress on Data and Communication Know-how (eds Satapathy, S. C., Bhatt, Y. C., Joshi, A. & Mishra, D. Ok.) 253–262 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0755-2_27 (Springer, 2016).

150. Wagner, P. et al. Speech synthesis analysis — state-of-the-art evaluation and suggestion for a novel analysis program. In tenth ISCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis (SSW 10) https://doi.org/10.21437/SSW.2019-19 (ISCA, 2019).

151. Kubichek, R. Mel-cepstral distance measure for goal speech high quality evaluation. In Proc. IEEE Pacific Rim Conf. Communications Computer systems and Sign Processing Vol. 1, 125–128 (1993).

152. Varshney, S., Farias, D., Brandman, D. M., Stavisky, S. D. & Miller, L. M. Utilizing computerized speech recognition to measure the intelligibility of speech synthesized from mind alerts. In 2023 eleventh Int. IEEE/EMBS Conf. Neural Engineering (NER) https://doi.org/10.1109/NER52421.2023.10123751 (IEEE, 2023).

153. Radford, A. et al. Strong speech recognition by way of large-scale weak supervision. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.04356 (2022).

154. Yates, A. J. Delayed auditory suggestions. Psychol. Bull. 60, 213–232 (1963).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

155. Zanette, D. Statistical patterns in written language. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.3336v1 (2014).

156. Adolphs, S. & Schmitt, N. Lexical protection of spoken discourse. Appl. Linguist. 24, 425–438 (2003).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

157. Laureys, S. et al. The locked-in syndrome: what’s it prefer to be aware however paralyzed and unvoiced? in Progress in Mind Analysis Vol. 150 (ed. Laureys, S.) 495–611 (Elsevier, 2005).

158. Peters, B. et al. Mind–laptop interface customers communicate up: the Digital Customers’ Discussion board on the 2013 Worldwide Mind–Pc Interface Assembly. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 96, S33–S37 (2015).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

159. Huggins, J. E., Wren, P. A. & Gruis, Ok. L. What would mind–laptop interface customers need? Opinions and priorities of potential customers with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 12, 318–324 (2011).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

160. Kreuzberger, D., Kühl, N. & Hirschl, S. Machine studying operations (MLOps): overview, definition, and structure. IEEE Entry. 11, 31866–31879 (2023).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

161. Gordon, E. M. et al. A somato-cognitive motion community alternates with effector areas in motor cortex. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05964-2 (2023).

162. Degenhart, A. D. et al. Remapping cortical modulation for electrocorticographic mind–laptop interfaces: a somatotopy-based method in people with upper-limb paralysis. J. Neural Eng. 15, 026021 (2018).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

163. Kikkert, S., Pfyffer, D., Verling, M., Freund, P. & Wenderoth, N. Finger somatotopy is preserved after tetraplegia however deteriorates over time. eLife 10, e67713 (2021).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

164. Bruurmijn, M. L. C. M., Pereboom, I. P. L., Vansteensel, M. J., Raemaekers, M. A. H. & Ramsey, N. F. Preservation of hand motion illustration within the sensorimotor areas of amputees. Mind 140, 3166–3178 (2017).

     Article 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

165. Guenther, F. H. Neural Management of Speech (MIT Press, 2016).

166. Castellucci, G. A., Kovach, C. Ok., Howard, M. A., Greenlee, J. D. W. & Lengthy, M. A. A speech planning community for interactive language use. Nature 602, 117–122 (2022).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

167. Murphy, E. et al. The spatiotemporal dynamics of semantic integration within the human mind. Nat. Commun. 14, 6336 (2023).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

168. Ozker, M., Doyle, W., Devinsky, O. & Flinker, A. A cortical community processes auditory error alerts throughout human speech manufacturing to take care of fluency. PLOS Biol. 20, e3001493 (2022).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

169. Quirarte, J. A. et al. Language supplementary motor space syndrome correlated with dynamic modifications in perioperative task-based useful MRI activations: case report. J. Neurosurg. 134, 1738–1742 (2020).

     Article 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

170. Bullock, L., Forseth, Ok. J., Woolnough, O., Rollo, P. S. & Tandon, N. Supplementary motor space in speech initiation: a large-scale intracranial EEG analysis of stereotyped phrase articulation. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.04.535557 (2023).

171. Oby, E. R. et al. New neural exercise patterns emerge with long-term studying. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 15210–15215 (2019).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

172. Luu, T. P., Nakagome, S., He, Y. & Contreras-Vidal, J. L. Actual-time EEG-based mind–laptop interface to a digital avatar enhances cortical involvement in human treadmill strolling. Sci. Rep. 7, 8895 (2017).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

173. Alimardani, M. et al. Mind–Pc Interface and Motor Imagery Coaching: The Function of Visible Suggestions and Embodiment. Evolving BCI Remedy — Participating Mind State Dynamicshttps://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.78695 (IntechOpen, 2018).

174. Orsborn, A. L. et al. Closed-loop decoder adaptation shapes neural plasticity for skillful neuroprosthetic management. Neuron 82, 1380–1393 (2014).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

175. Muller, L. et al. Skinny-film, high-density micro-electrocorticographic decoding of a human cortical gyrus. In 2016 thirty eighth Annual Worldwide Convention of the IEEE Engineering in Medication and Biology Society (EMBC) https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591001 (2016).

176. Duraivel, S. et al. Excessive-resolution neural recordings enhance the accuracy of speech decoding. Nat. Commun. 14, 6938 (2023).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

177. Kaiju, T., Inoue, M., Hirata, M. & Suzuki, T. Excessive-density mapping of primate digit representations with a 1152-channel µECoG array. J. Neural Eng. 18, 036025 (2021).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

178. Woods, V. et al. Lengthy-term recording reliability of liquid crystal polymer µECoG arrays. J. Neural Eng. 15, 066024 (2018).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

179. Rachinskiy, I. et al. Excessive-density, actively multiplexed µECoG array on strengthened silicone substrate. Entrance. Nanotechnol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnano.2022.837328 (2022).

180. Solar, J. et al. Intraoperative microseizure detection utilizing a high-density micro-electrocorticography electrode array. Mind Commun. 4, fcac122 (2022).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

181. Ho, E. et al. The layer 7 cortical interface: a scalable and minimally invasive mind–laptop interface platform. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.02.474656 (2022).

182. Oxley, T. J. et al. Motor neuroprosthesis implanted with neurointerventional surgical procedure improves capability for actions of each day residing duties in extreme paralysis: first in-human expertise. J. NeuroIntervent. Surg. 13, 102–108 (2021).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

183. Chen, R., Canales, A. & Anikeeva, P. Neural recording and modulation applied sciences. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 1–16 (2017).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

184. Hong, G. & Lieber, C. M. Novel electrode applied sciences for neural recordings. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 330–345 (2019).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

185. Sahasrabuddhe, Ok. et al. The Argo: a excessive channel rely recording system for neural recording in vivo. J. Neural Eng. 18, 015002 (2021).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

186. Musk, E. & Neuralink. An built-in mind–machine interface platform with hundreds of channels. J. Med. Web Res. 21, e16194 (2019).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

187. Paulk, A. C. et al. Massive-scale neural recordings with single neuron decision utilizing neuropixels probes in human cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 252–263 (2022).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

188. Chung, J. E. et al. Excessive-density single-unit human cortical recordings utilizing the neuropixels probe. Neuron 110, 2409–2421.e3 (2022).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

189. Kingma, D. P. & Welling, M. An introduction to variational autoencoders. Discovered. Traits Mach. Be taught. 12, 307–392 (2019).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

190. Schneider, S., Lee, J. H. & Mathis, M. W. Learnable latent embeddings for joint behavioural and neural evaluation. Nature 617, 360–368 (2023).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

191. Liu, R. et al. Drop, swap, and generate: a self-supervised method for producing neural exercise. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.02338 (2021).

192. Cho, C. J., Chang, E. & Anumanchipalli, G. Neural latent aligner: cross-trial alignment for studying representations of complicated, naturalistic neural knowledge. In Proc. fortieth Int. Conf. Machine Studying 5661–5676 (PMLR, 2023).

193. Keshtkaran, M. R. et al. A big-scale neural community coaching framework for generalized estimation of single-trial inhabitants dynamics. Nat. Strategies 19, 1572–1577 (2022).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

194. Berezutskaya, J. et al. Direct speech reconstruction from sensorimotor mind exercise with optimized deep studying fashions. J. Neural Eng. 20, 056010 (2023).

     Article 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

195. Touvron, H. et al. LLaMA: Open and Environment friendly Basis Language Fashions. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.13971 (2023).

196. Graves, A. Sequence transduction with recurrent neural networks. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1211.3711 (2012).

197. Shi, Y. et al. Emformer: environment friendly reminiscence transformer based mostly acoustic mannequin for low latency streaming speech recognition. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.10759 (2020).

198. Rapeaux, A. B. & Constandinou, T. G. Implantable mind machine interfaces: first-in-human research, know-how challenges and tendencies. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 72, 102–111 (2021).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

199. Matsushita, Ok. et al. A completely implantable wi-fi ECoG 128-channel recording gadget for human mind–machine interfaces: W-HERBS. Entrance. Neurosci. 12, 511 (2018).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

200. Cajigas, I. et al. Implantable mind–laptop interface for neuroprosthetic-enabled volitional hand grasp restoration in spinal wire harm. Mind Commun. 3, fcab248 (2021).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

201. Jarosiewicz, B. & Morrell, M. The RNS system: brain-responsive neurostimulation for the therapy of epilepsy. Knowledgeable Rev. Med. Dev. 18, 129–138 (2021).

     Article 
     CAS 

     Google Scholar 

202. Lorach, H. et al. Strolling naturally after spinal wire harm utilizing a mind–backbone interface. Nature 618, 126–133 (2023).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

203. Weiss, J. M., Gaunt, R. A., Franklin, R., Boninger, M. L. & Collinger, J. L. Demonstration of a transportable intracortical mind–laptop interface. Mind-Comput. Interfaces 6, 106–117 (2019).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

204. Kim, J. S., Kwon, S. U. & Lee, T. G. Pure dysarthria as a consequence of small cortical stroke. Neurology 60, 1178–1180 (2003).

     Article 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

205. City, P. P. et al. Left-hemispheric dominance for articulation: a potential research on acute ischaemic dysarthria at totally different localizations. Mind 129, 767–777 (2006).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

206. Wu, P. et al. Speaker-independent acoustic-to-articulatory speech inversion. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.06774 (2023).

207. Oppenheim, A. V., Schafer, R. W. & Schafer, R. W. Discrete-Time Sign Processing (Pearson, 2014).

208. Kim, J. W., Salamon, J., Li, P. & Bello, J. P. CREPE: a convolutional illustration for pitch estimation. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.06182 (2018).

209. Park, Ok. & Kim, J. g2pE. Github https://github.com/Kyubyong/g2p (2019).

210. Duffy, J. R. Motor Speech Problems: Substrates, Differential Analysis, and Administration (Elsevier Well being Sciences, 2019).

211. Basilakos, A., Rorden, C., Bonilha, L., Moser, D. & Fridriksson, J. Patterns of poststroke mind harm that predict speech manufacturing errors in apraxia of speech and aphasia dissociate. Stroke 46, 1561–1566 (2015).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

212. Berthier, M. L. Poststroke aphasia: epidemiology, pathophysiology and therapy. Medication Growing old 22, 163–182 (2005).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

213. Wilson, S. M. et al. Restoration from aphasia within the first 12 months after stroke. Mind 146, 1021–1039 (2022).

     Article 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

214. Marzinske, M. Assist for speech, language problems. Mayo Clinic Well being System https://www.mayoclinichealthsystem.org/hometown-health/speaking-of-health/help-is-available-for-speech-and-language-disorders (2022).

215. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. CDC https://www.cdc.gov/als/WhatisALS.html (CDC, 2022).

216. Sokolov, A. Inside Speech and Thought (Springer Science & Enterprise Media, 2012).

217. Alderson-Day, B. & Fernyhough, C. Inside speech: growth, cognitive capabilities, phenomenology, and neurobiology. Psychol. Bull. 141, 931–965 (2015).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

218. Sankaran, N., Moses, D., Chiong, W. & Chang, E. F. Suggestions for selling consumer company within the design of speech neuroprostheses. Entrance. Hum. Neurosci. 17, 1298129 (2023).

     Article 
     PubMed 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

219. Solar, X. & Ye, B. The useful differentiation of mind–laptop interfaces (BCIs) and its moral implications. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 10, 1–9 (2023).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

220. Ienca, M., Haselager, P. & Emanuel, E. J. Mind leaks and client neurotechnology. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 805–810 (2018).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

221. Yuste, R. Advocating for neurodata privateness and neurotechnology regulation. Nat. Protoc. 18, 2869–2875 (2023).

     Article 
     CAS 
     PubMed 

     Google Scholar 

222. Kamal, A. H. et al. An individual-centered, registry-based studying well being system for palliative care: a path to coproducing higher outcomes, expertise, worth, and science. J. Palliat. Med. 21, S-61 (2018).

     Article 
     PubMed Central 

     Google Scholar 

223. Alford, J. The a number of sides of co-production: constructing on the work of Elinor Ostrom. Public. Manag. Rev. 16, 299–316 (2014).

     Article 

     Google Scholar 

224. Institute of Medication (US) Roundtable on Worth & Science-Pushed Well being Care. Medical Information because the Fundamental Staple of Well being Studying: Creating and Defending a Public Good: Workshop Abstract (Nationwide Academies Press, 2011).

Obtain references