When Wine and Apple Both Help the Production of Grapes: ERP Evidence for Post-lexical Semantic Facilitation in … – Frontiers

Introduction

In on a regular basis conversations, we select effortlessly the proper phrases in our huge psychological lexicon to speak the which means we intend to. Most serial fashions of speech manufacturing contemplate that the unfold of activation from conceptual (pre-lexical) representations to lexical choice is semantically pushed. In that context, lexical choice is seen as a decisional course of, throughout which we’ve to pick the proper “goal” phrase amongst different semantically associated “non-target” phrases. These co-activated non-target phrases can both create a facilitatory or an inhibitory context, respectively rushing up or slowing down speech planning (Roelofs, 1992, 2006; Chen and Mirman, 2012). In language manufacturing analysis, semantic interference results (i.e., phrase manufacturing slowed down by an inhibitory semantic context) have obtained lots of curiosity. They’ve been primarily studied with the Stroop activity (for an integrative overview, see MacLeod, 1991) and its variant, the picture-word interference paradigm (PWIP), during which photos as a substitute of colours are used and the asynchrony of the picture-word pair presentation is manipulated (for the primary description of a PWIP, see Rosinski et al., 1975). Contrasting with the plethora of research coping with interference, just a few investigations adressed semantic facilitation results (for a dialogue, see Mahon et al., 2007); and but, “pure” semantic contexts appear to be usually facilitative somewhat than interfering, as it’s often proven in semantic categorization duties (Kuipers and La Heij, 2008; Hantsch et al., 2012), semantic priming duties in speech notion (Lucas, 2000) and film naming after a constraining sentential context (Griffin and Bock, 1998; Piai et al., 2014b, 2015). Psycholinguistic research may very well have targeted an excessive amount of on interfering semantic results, i.e., on the exception that proves the rule. In that sense, Mahon et al. (2007, p. 505) argued “that the important information that ought to inform fashions of lexical choice are semantic facilitation results” and never (solely) interference results.

Within the PWIP, semantic interference and facilitation results are outlined as a distinction of imply latencies when naming an image in two experimental circumstances: a semantic-high situation (often a phrase from the identical class because the goal image) and a semantic-low situation (a phrase unrelated with the goal image). Semantic interference within the PWIP has been sometimes obtained with a semantic-high situation consisting of coordinates (e.g., pear-apple; Rosinski et al., 1975; Rosinski, 1977; Lupker, 1979; La Heij, 1988; La Heij and van den Hof, 1995; Starreveld and La Heij, 1996; Vitkovitch and Tyrrell, 1999; Costa et al., 2005; Finkbeiner and Caramazza, 2006; Sailor et al., 2009; Damian and Spalek, 2014), independently of the energy of the specific overlap between the image and the phrase (Hutson and Damian, 2014). However semantic interference within the PWIP has additionally been obtained with subordinates (e.g., tulip-flower; Hantsch et al., 2005, 2012), superordinates (e.g., bird-seagull; Hantsch et al., 2005; Kuipers et al., 2006) and part-terms (e.g., window-car; Sailor and Brooks, 2014). Even when the standard and infrequently described result’s interference, the PWIP can simply as a lot induce semantic facilitation, but underneath sure experimental circumstances. Semantic facilitation within the PWIP has been obtained with a big panel of semantically associated phrases: coordinates (Finkbeiner and Caramazza, 2006), subordinates (Costa et al., 2003), superordinates (Vitkovitch and Tyrrell, 1999; Damian and Abdel Rahman, 2003), associates not being coordinates (e.g., milk-cow; Alario et al., 2000; Costa et al., 2005; Sailor et al., 2009; de Zubicaray et al., 2013; Damian and Spalek, 2014; Sailor and Brooks, 2014), associated adjectives (e.g., chilly-ice; Bölte et al., 2013) and associated verbs (e.g., sit-chair; Mahon et al., 2007). Extra crucially, some PWIP research demonstrated that the very same set of supplies utilized in slighlty completely different experimental settings can shift the polarity of the impact from interference to facilitation. For example, the Stimulus Onset Asynchrony (SOA) appears to play a predominant position: a number of research (Glaser and Düngelhoff, 1984; Alario, 2001; Bloem et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2016) reported semantic interference notably with near-to-0 SOAs however semantic facilitation with lengthy destructive SOAs (from −400 ms to −1000 ms). The polarity of the impact may also be affected by the visibility of the primes (Finkbeiner and Caramazza, 2006), the modality of the primes and the speed of congruent responses (Hantsch et al., 2009), and the presence of a familiarization part (Collina et al., 2013).

The massive quantity of research on semantic interference has given rise to completely different interpretative hypotheses concerning its underlying mechanisms and served to develop fashions of lexical entry. Interfering results within the PWIP have typically been interpreted as reflecting the competitors between lexical representations (Schriefers et al., 1990; Levelt et al., 1999; Damian and Bowers, 2003; Howard et al., 2006). Resulting from lexical competitors, the latency of the goal phrase choice “mathematically” is dependent upon the state of activation of the non-target phrases (Levelt et al., 1999). In different phrases, it takes longer to pick the proper lexical illustration amongst a excessive variety of rivals strongly co-activated. Nevertheless, different fashions find the competitors course of at a pre-lexical stage, through a studying mechanism weakening the semantic-to-lexical connections (Oppenheim et al., 2010) or at a post-lexical stage (Finkbeiner and Caramazza, 2006; Mahon et al., 2007; Janssen et al., 2008). The response-competition (or response-exclusion) speculation certainly states that in presence of a picture-word pair, the distractor phrase is mechanically encoded and put within the phonological output buffer and able to be produced (Lupker, 1979; Roelofs, 2003). The distractor phrase must be detected and deleted earlier than with the ability to produce the goal phrase related to the image. The extra semantic options are shared between the image and the interfering phrase, the extra time might be essential to take away the distractor phrase from the response buffer. For instance, the image “cat” related to the phrase “canine” results in a really aggressive scenario, as a result of the overlap of semantic options is excessive, making the canine a related candidate when naming a cat. Consequently, the exclusion of a semantically shut potential candidate will increase naming latencies within the PWIP. Lastly, some authors argue {that a} normal mechanism liable for checking on-line the accuracy of speech manufacturing, the verbal self-monitoring, turns into extra alert in semantic-high circumstances, both to suppress the buffered response (Dhooge and Hartsuiker, 2012) or to validate the choice of the target-word within the context of extremely activated rivals (Maess et al., 2002; Ganushchak and Schiller, 2008).

As for semantic facilitation results within the PWIP, they’ve often been interpreted as reflecting computerized spreading-activation from semantically associated conceptual representations to their corresponding lexical representations. In line with this view, a better stage of activation of the semantic nodes leads to quicker lexical choice, independently of the non-target phrases, i.e., with out lexical competitors (Dell and O’Seaghdha, 1991; Mahon et al., 2007). Just like semantic interference, different interpretations don’t find the spreading course of on the lexical stage. First, the Conceptual Choice Mannequin (Bloem et al., 2004) claims that the co-activated conceptual representations don’t mechanically activate their corresponding lexical representations. Subsequently, the semantic spreading-activation is restricted to the conceptual/pre-lexical stage (Collins and Loftus, 1975), resulting in an earlier begin of the lexical stage and shorter naming latencies. Second, Starreveld and La Heij (1995, 1996) proposed an interactive activation mannequin accounting for context results within the PWIP, the place semantic and phonological ranges are bidirectionnally interconnected, and during which semantic similarity results are situated on the post-lexical stage. On this connectionist mannequin, the phonological node of the goal receives activation each from the image and the associated phrase as a result of connections on the semantic stage.

Though counting on completely different theoretical backgrounds, semantic interference and facilitation within the PWIP have each been alternately interpreted as pre-lexical, lexical or post-lexical results. These interpretations have been based mostly totally on behavioral/offline measures (latencies within the case of image naming), which could not be exact sufficient to know which processing stage is affected. For this function, event-related potentials (ERPs) have been mixed with PWIPs in just a few research to element the time-course of semantic context results on single phrase manufacturing. Semantic interference results have been investigated within the framework of lexical competitors that appears amplified within the PWIP with near-to-0 ms SOAs. ERP modulations for coordinates (vs. unrelated distractors) have been reported beginning 230–275 ms (Aristei et al., 2011; Piai et al., 2012; Wong et al., 2017), or 320–350 ms publish image onset (Dell’Acqua et al., 2010; Piai et al., 2014a; Shitova et al., 2016). The 100 ms discrepancy within the time-windows related to semantic interference in these research are hardly appropriate with a novel interpretation, all of the extra that the later time-window (320–350 ms after image onset) falls a lot past estimates situating lexical choice earlier than 275 ms (Indefrey, 2011). Two different research reported semantic interference for coordinates that was somewhat interpreted as semantic priming, however once more results on ERPs have been noticed in very completely different time-windows: both very early, i.e., 106 ms publish image onset (Dell’Acqua et al., 2010) or fairly late, i.e., 325 ms publish image onset (Blackford et al., 2012). Blackford et al. (2012) offered additionally another interpretation for his or her late semantic ERP modulations, particularly that they presumably mirrored “exercise on the phonological word-form illustration”. Lastly, ERP research addressing semantic facilitation results within the PWIP targeted on associates: ERP modulations by semantic context began as early as 120 ms publish image onset (Hirschfeld et al., 2008) or round 200 ms publish image onset (Aristei et al., 2011), and have been interpreted respectively as reflecting a speed-up of object identification or (pre-)lexical processes.

The aforementioned ERP research investigating the time-course of semantic interference and facilitation within the PWIP reported discrepant outcomes on their time-course and introduced forth completely different interpretations. As summerized above for the behavioral outcomes, a few of these discrepancies could also be as a result of SOA and to the various kinds of semantic relationships between the phrase and the image. To attempt to make clear these two variables, the word-picture relationship (associative vs. categorical) was manipulated within the ERP research reported right here. We used an extended destructive SOA to extend the chance of acquiring semantic facilitation results (Glaser and Düngelhoff, 1984; Alario, 2001; Bloem et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2016), on a cloth beforehand examined with a brief destructive SOA (see under within the “Supplies and Strategies” part).

Among the many set of variables influencing semantic results within the PWIP, the variety of phrases offered with the image has been proven to extend semantic interference. When two categorical phrases have been offered alongside the image, they slowed down image naming (Abdel Rahman and Melinger, 2008), which was interpreted as elevated competitors as a result of a better variety of activated lexical rivals. To our data, the presentation of two semantically associated phrases in a PWIP has been used solely to review semantic interference (Abdel Rahman and Melinger, 2008; Melinger and Abdel Rahman, 2013), however not facilitation. To handle this situation, we in contrast naming responses and their neural correlates when an image was preceded by one phrase or by two phrases (single vs. double priming hereafter). This manipulation of the quantity of semantic contextual priming, in addition to the kind of priming phrases (associative/categorical) ought to make a decisive perception to present fashions of speech manufacturing. The current investigation may supply revolutionary data about phrase manufacturing: semantic facilitation is inherent in on a regular basis dialog, as we all the time profit from a given semantic context to provide speech simply. This follows the argument that semantic facilitation within the PWIP (but additionally within the blocked-cyclic naming paradigm) may very well be even extra pure and extra related than semantic interference to tell on lexical choice (Mahon et al., 2007; Navarrete et al., 2014).

We predicted that individuals can be quicker when naming photos after semantically associated primes (associative or categorical), as in comparison with unrelated primes with lengthy destructive SOAs. Early ERP modulations across the P2/N2 part (~200–250 ms publish image onset) would presumably level to a lexical locus of semantic facilitation, whereas earlier/later modulations to pre-/post-lexical processes respectively. A number of phrases ought to produce extra facilitation than a single phrase in the event that they increase the activation of the goal by overcoming lexical competitors, or much less facilitation in the event that they improve lexical competitors in maintaining a number of rivals extremely energetic.

Supplies and Strategies

Members

Twenty-four French-speaking and right-handed adults participated on this research (aged 19–24, imply 21.1, one male). They have been undergraduate college students on the College of Geneva and obtained course credit score for his or her participation. All of them had regular or corrected-to-normal imaginative and prescient. None of them had a big historical past of neurological dysfunction. This research was carried out in accordance with the suggestions of the moral committee of the School of Psychology and Instructional Science of Geneva College for analysis on wholesome topics (“Etude psycholinguistique de la manufacturing et compréhension du langage: approches comportementales et électrophysiologiques”) with written knowledgeable consent from all topics in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was authorised by the moral committee on Could sixteenth 2013.

Materials

A set of 59 black and white line drawings (resized to 240 × 245 pixels) have been chosen from two databases (Alario and Ferrand, 1999; Bonin et al., 2003). All photos had a excessive identify settlement in french (above 70%) and lined 17 completely different semantic classes (1–13 objects per class): meals, animals, housekeeping materials, bushes, weapons, jewels, residing locations, music devices, desk materials, media, autos, instruments, physique elements, recipients, private care objects, kitchenware, garments. Every image/phrase on this set of 59 stimuli was linked with six phrases: two associative phrases, respectively one high-associative phrase (i.e., greater than 14.6% of the topics gave this phrase as the primary affiliate in Ferrand and Alario, 1998) and one low-associative phrase (i.e., lower than 14.6% in Ferrand and Alario, 1998), two phrases belonging to the identical semantic class (as said in Bueno and Megherbi, 2009, when semantic class was accessible) and two unrelated phrases. Unrelated phrases corresponded to half of the associative phrases and half of the specific phrases re-paired to match unrelated targets. In line with the database Lexique (New et al., 2004), the associative (ASS), categorical (CAT) and unrelated (UNR) phrases lists have been comparable when it comes to lexical frequency and size (phonemes/syllables). Not one of the associative phrases belonged to the identical semantic class because the goal to call and all verbs have been become their derivated widespread nouns (e.g., to fly—flight). The priming phrases didn’t share the identical preliminary or last phonemes with the goal to call. The high-associative phrase or probably the most frequent categorical phrase was offered in case of single priming and in first place in case of double priming. An merchandise instance is given in Desk 1 and all the listing of phrase stimuli may be discovered within the Supplementary Materials.

Desk 1. Instance of prime samples for the goal image “airplane”.

In whole, every goal image appeared six instances all through the experiment, i.e., in three completely different circumstances (ASS, CAT, UNR) and preceded by one or two phrases (single or double priming). The stimuli presentation order was pseudo-randomized and counterbalanced in twelve completely different lists, in order that the identical goal photos have been separated by a minimum of 20 different photos and the situation (ASS, CAT, UNR) was an identical for a most of two consecutive trials. In every listing, the variety of primes that preceded the goal (i.e., one or two) was randomly blended.

The fabric was examined in a preliminary research during which a written single phrase was offered 66 ms earlier than the image to call, with a purpose to assess if it was capable of elicit the classical semantic interference impact (a minimum of with coordinates). After a fixation cross (1250 ms onscreen), the phrase prime was offered for 53 ms, and a 13 ms clean display preceded the image (SOA −66 ms) which remained 2000 ms on display. The inter-stimulus interval lasted 1000 ms. All different manipulations and behavioral information analyses have been the identical as within the ERP experiment (see under). Twenty-eight undergraduate college students took half on this preliminary research, and didn’t participate within the ERP experiment (aged 18–35, 5 males).

As anticipated, categorical semantic interference was noticed with slower response instances with categorical primes (imply RT 806 ms) relative to unrelated primes (imply RT 791 ms; t(4623) = 3.499, p < 0.001) and to associative primes (imply RT 785 ms; t(4620) = 4.675, p < 0.001), however no distinction was discovered between associative and unrelated primes (t(4622) = 1.185, p = 0.24).

Process

Members sat in a snug desk chair in a sound-proof room, roughly 50 cm in entrance of a pc display. They have been randomly assigned to one of many 12 counterbalanced lists. Earlier than the experiment, they first underwent a familiarization part consisting in studying aloud the names written beneath the 59 goal photos. Then, they carried out a apply part consisting in naming the 59 goal photos as soon as, with out show of the names. This double pre-exposure was supposed not solely to keep away from naming errors and hesitations, but additionally to attenuate the repetition priming and the position of object identification throughout the experiment (Francis, 2014). In these two early phases, they might proceed at their very own tempo, the images being offered one after the other on the pc display in alphabetical order.

As for the duty itself, the topics have been instructed to call the images as shortly and precisely as doable and there have been three warming-up filler trials earlier than starting the experiment. The trials have been offered via E-Prime 2.0 software program (Psychology Software program Instruments, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and responses have been recorded with an exterior microphone.

On every trial, a inexperienced fixation plus signal (+) appeared within the heart of the display for 250 ms. The plus signal remained on display till the presentation of the written prime(s): a written phrase prime was offered within the heart of the display in font Courier New 48 for 554 ms (SOA −700 ms). In case of double priming, the second phrase prime was offered alike after a clean display of 150 ms (SOA −1400 ms). A clean display was then offered for 150 ms and eventually the image appeared on the middle of the display for 2000 ms. Between every trial, one other clean display was offered throughout 2000 ms. Topics have been inspired to blink on this time interval. There was a break after every quarter of the experiment, which lasted roughly 35 min in whole.

The electroencephalogram (EEG) was acquired by the continual recording of 128 electrodes positioned on a comfortable nylon cap with normal 10-5 places (Oostenveld and Praamstra, 2001). Indicators have been recorded with the Biosemi ActiveTwo system (Biosemi V.O.F Amsterdam, Netherlands) at a 512 Hz pattern, with filters DC to 104 Hz and three dB/octave slope.

Knowledge Evaluation

Behavioral Evaluation

We first excluded from the behavioral information all trials during which individuals didn’t produce the anticipated single goal phrase or when no response was given inside the 2 s time restrict. For each appropriate trial, the response time (RT) similar to the vocal onset was outlined manually based on the spectrogram and the waveform with the software program Examine Vocal (CheckVocal 2.2.6, Protopapas, 2007). Naming latencies located under or above three normal deviations of every topic’s imply have been excluded. The statistical analyses have been performed with R software program (R Improvement Core Staff, 2003). The errors have been analyzed with generalized mixed-effects fashions for binomial distributions (Jaeger, 2008) and the manufacturing latencies with linear mixed-effects regression fashions (Baayen et al., 2008).

EEG Evaluation

The pre-analyses have been performed with Cartool software program 3.60 (Brunet et al., 2011). Epochs of 600 ms time-locked to 150 ms earlier than the image onset (stimulus-locked) and epochs of 450 ms time-locked to 100 ms earlier than the vocal onset (response-locked) have been extracted and averaged for every topic throughout circumstances, with butterworth filters set to 0.2–30 Hz (2nd order acausal Butterworth filter with −12 dB/octave roll-off). All epochs associated to appropriate productions have been recalculated in opposition to the typical reference, visually inspected and accepted solely within the absence of artifact, resembling eyeblinks, motor artifacts or giant amplitude variations. Solely trials with artifact-free stimulus- and response-locked epochs have been retained. Contaminated electrodes (as much as 15% of the 128 electrodes) have been interpolated with a 3-D splines interpolation (Perrin et al., 1987).

The FieldTrip MATLAB software program toolbox (Oostenveld et al., 2011) with customized scripts was used to investigate the waveform amplitudes over all the information set at every time level on the 128 electrodes individually on stimulus- and response-locked ERPs. To be able to determine during which time-windows important clusters confirmed divergences in ERP amplitudes between the unrelated situation (UNR) and the semantically associated circumstances (ASS, CAT), non-parametric cluster-based permutations have been computed (2000 randomizations with a spatial threshold at 4 clustered electrodes and alpha criterion above 0.01 for every time level). We used such a conservative threshold with a purpose to reduce the bias of a number of comparisons. Within the spatio-temporal/topographic evaluation, we first examined whether or not circumstances confirmed important variations in world dissimilarity utilizing non-parametric randomization assessments (referred to as “TANOVAs” with out being an evaluation of variance) with the RAGU software program (Koenig et al., 2011). Knowledge have been normalized (L2 norm) and 5000 runs of randomization have been computed. “TANOVAs” have been calculated between the unrelated situation (UNR) and every of the semantically associated circumstances (ASS, CAT). Topographic variations in time-windows longer than 20 ms and with an alpha criterion under 0.01 for every time level have been retained. To be able to cowl all the planning course of in every situation, the grand technique of stimulus- and response-locked epochs have been mixed based on RTs by eradicating the overlapping sign. The length of the mixed waveforms of the grand averages corresponded to the imply naming latencies of the group of topics in every situation and the identical process was utilized to every particular person ERP. Then, the spatio-temporal clustering of secure microstate maps was performed on the grand averages with the Ok-Means clustering algorithm within the Cartool software program (5000 runs of randomization). This process segments ERPs in durations of quasi-stable world electrophysiological patterns at scalp (i.e., topographic maps or ERP microstates) by compressing the variability of ERPs in a sequence of template maps which summarize the info based on which topographic template greatest explains the group-averaged ERP responses to every experimental situation (Pascual-Marqui et al., 1995; Michel and Murray, 2012). The choice of the optimum variety of ERP maps that greatest clarify the group-averaged information throughout circumstances was based mostly on a mix of a number of standards resembling cross-validation and Krzanovski-Lai (see Murray et al., 2008). Statistical smoothing was utilized to take away temporally remoted topographic maps with low explanatory energy. Clusters that correlated above 97% have been merged and segments shorter than 20 ms have been rejected. The statistical validation of this evaluation was obtained with a becoming process that consisted in evaluating every of the microstates noticed within the grand averages with the moment-by-moment scalp topography of single-subjects’ ERPs. Repeated measures evaluation of variance (ANOVAs) have been then calculated with an alpha criterion under 0.01 to match the imply length and the imply world defined variance (GEV) of the fitted microstates throughout topics in every situation, with Fisher LSD assessments for the pairwise comparisons.

Outcomes

Behavioral Outcomes

Of the 8496 trials, 1.94% have been errors and 1.79% have been located under or above three normal deviations of every topic’s imply, main to three.73% information loss. The errors have been distributed as follows: categorical semantic (41%), no responses (22%), hesitations (21%), unrelated (5%), associative semantic (4%), phonological (4%) and morphological (3%). Within the error evaluation, the ASS situation led to a decrease price of errors, as in comparison with the UNR (z = 1.923, p = 0.05) and the CAT circumstances (z = −2.014, p = 0.04), however there was no distinction between UNR and CAT circumstances (z = −0.094, p = 0.925).

The manufacturing latencies for every situation are offered in Desk 2. The analyses revealed a big impact of situation (F(2,8083.9) = 60.323, p < 0.001), variety of primes (F(1,8083.8) = 68.76, p < 0.001), merchandise repetition (F(5,8083.9) = 50.264, p < 0.001) and a big interplay between the situation and variety of primes (F(2,8083.8) = 7.676, p < 0.001). We due to this fact performed separate analyses for single and double priming.

www.frontiersin.org

Desk 2. Imply response time (and normal deviation) in ms for every situation.

In single phrase priming, the mannequin indicated a big impact of situation (F(2,3984) = 13.831, p < 0.001) and merchandise repetition (F(5,3984) = 20.541, p < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons confirmed that each CAT and ASS circumstances led to quicker RTs as in comparison with UNR situation (CAT vs. UNR : t(3985) = −3.281, β = −15.34, SE = 4.68, p = 0.001; ASS vs. UNR : t(3985) = 5.137, β = −24.02, SE = 4.68, p < 0.001). Though solely marginally important (t(3985) = −1.857, β = 8.68, SE = 4.68, p = 0.06), the ASS situation additionally led to quicker RTs as in comparison with the CAT situation. In double phrase priming, important results of situation (F(2,4013) = 53.391, p < 0.001) and merchandise repetition (F(5,4013) = 30.84, p < 0.001) additionally appeared. An analogous sample to single priming was noticed in two by two comparisons of double priming (ASS vs. CAT: t(4014) = 5.887, β = 28.17, SE = 4.79, p < 0.001; CAT vs. UNR : t(4014) = −4.193, β = −20.14, SE = 4.8, p < 0.001; ASS vs. UNR : t(4013) = −10.113, β = −48.3, SE = 4.78, p < 0.001).

In abstract, RTs decreased as follows via the circumstances: UNR > CAT > ASS, with an extra rushing impact of the double phrase priming.

EEG Outcomes

All 24 topics have been included within the subsequent evaluation with 61%–98.3% of artifact-free epochs accepted per situation. We performed separate analyses for single priming and double priming, as a result of interplay between the situation and the variety of primes.

Single Phrase Priming

Within the waveforms’ amplitudes evaluation of stimulus-locked ERPs, there have been important variations from about 355 to 420 ms post-picture onset between the UNR and ASS circumstances (Determine 1A left), and from about 330 to 430 ms post-picture onset between the UNR and CAT circumstances (Determine 1A proper). In each circumstances, the variations involved giant clusters of central electrodes. On this time-window, the waveforms of the associated circumstances (CAT and ASS) have been much less destructive than the unrelated situation notably on the electrode Cz (Determine 1A). There have been no important amplitude variations between ASS and CAT circumstances on stimulus-locked ERPs. No distinction was noticed on response-aligned ERPs every time.

www.frontiersin.org

Determine 1. Outcomes for single phrase priming. (A) Examples of group-averaged waveforms for the UNR-ASS (left) and UNR-CAT (proper) contrasts on stimulus-locked ERPs: time-windows of serious clusters over a minimum of 4 electrodes are highlighted and all electrodes exhibiting the highlighted impact are crossed on the topographical illustration. (B) Outcomes of “TANOVA” spatio-temporal evaluation for a similar contrasts: bars symbolize time-periods of serious variations in world similarity. (C) Temporal distribution of secure electrophysiological patterns at scalp from the spatio-temporal segmentation on the mixed stimulus- and response-locked grand averages matching the precise response instances of every experimental situation (*signifies a big distinction in map length).

Within the spatio-temporal segmentation evaluation, a topographic consistency take a look at (Koenig and Melie-García, 2010) confirmed a constant sample of energetic sources for every situation throughout topics throughout the entire stimulus- and response-locked averaged epochs. The TANOVAs revealed topographic variations from about 335 to 450 ms publish image onset for the UNR-ASS comparability (Determine 1B left), and from about 340 to 435 ms publish image onset for the UNR-CAT comparability (Determine 1B proper), intently matching the time-windows of serious variations on waveforms’ amplitudes. TANOVAs between ASS and CAT circumstances revealed no important topographic distinction. In response-locked ERPs, no topographic distinction appeared between circumstances. The spatio-temporal segmentation on the mixed grand common ERPs beginning 150 ms pre-picture to 100 ms pre-response recognized six completely different durations of quasi-stable topographic patterns summarizing the EEG sign of every situation and accounting for 98.1% of the variance of the info (Determine 1C). Following visible inspection of the time distribution of these six maps and the TANOVAs outcomes, the becoming of those topographic patterns within the particular person ERPs was performed in two completely different time-windows: 0–300 ms (first 4 map templates) and 300 ms to the top of the sign (final two maps). The imply length and GEV of every map per situation throughout individuals are offered in Desk 3. The GEV corresponds to the variance inside these two becoming time-windows (and never inside the whole planning interval). Statistical comparisons on the length of every map between circumstances have been important just for map 5 (F(2,46) = 6.899, p = 0.002). Map 5 was shorter within the ASS (p = 0.003) and CAT circumstances (p = 0.002) as in comparison with the UNR situation. The GEV evaluation confirmed convergent outcomes because the GEV was modulated by the circumstances solely in map 5 (F(2,46) = 5.268, p = 0.009). The GEV was greater within the ASS (p = 0.02) and CAT (p = 0.004) circumstances as in comparison with the UNR situation.

www.frontiersin.org

Desk 3. Imply length (in ms) and International Defined Variance (GEV, in %) of the six microstates in every situation for single phrase priming based on the becoming process within the particular person ERPs.

Double Phrase Priming

Within the waveforms’ amplitudes evaluation, the UNR-ASS comparability confirmed important variations in three time-windows: from −145 ms to −70 ms pre-picture, from −30 ms pre-picture to 35 ms post-picture onset and from 285 ms to 445 ms post-picture onset (Determine 2A left). Within the first and second time-windows, the variations concerned giant clusters of anterior and posterior electrodes, whereas within the third time-window, they have been on central electrodes. Within the UNR-CAT comparability, two time-windows of serious amplitude variations emerged: 275–320 and 375–405 ms post-picture onset (Determine 2A proper), involving clusters of anterior and central electrodes. The waveforms of the associated circumstances have been much less destructive than the unrelated situation (Determine 2A). The ASS-CAT comparability of stimulus-locked ERPs confirmed important amplitude variations from −35 ms pre-picture to 25 ms post-picture onset. There have been no important amplitude variations within the response-locked ERPs.

www.frontiersin.org

Determine 2. Outcomes for double phrase priming. (A) Examples of group-averaged waveforms for the UNR-ASS (left) and UNR-CAT (proper) contrasts on stimulus-locked ERPs: time-windows of serious clusters over a minimum of 4 electrodes are highlighted and all electrodes exhibiting the highlighted impact are crossed on the topographical representations. (B) Outcomes of “TANOVA” spatio-temporal evaluation for a similar contrasts: bars symbolize time-periods of serious variations in world similarity. (C) Temporal distribution of secure electrophysiological patterns at scalp from the spatio-temporal segmentation on the mixed stimulus- and response-locked grand averages matching the precise response instances of every experimental situation (*signifies a big distinction in map length).

Within the spatio-temporal segmentation evaluation, a topographic consistency take a look at (Koenig and Melie-García, 2010) additionally confirmed a constant sample of energetic sources for every situation throughout topics throughout the entire stimulus- and response-locked averaged epochs. The UNR-ASS comparability revealed important topographic variations −140 to −60 ms pre-picture, −30 ms pre-picture to 85 ms publish image onset and from 310 to 450 ms publish image onset (Determine 2B). The UNR-CAT comparability confirmed topographic variations −140 to −115 ms pre-picture and from 360 ms to 430 ms post-picture onset (Determine 2B). As for the ASS-CAT comparability, it revealed topographic variations in two time-windows, particularly −35 ms pre-picture to 35 ms post-picture onset and 55–80 ms post-picture onset, overlapping waveform amplitudes variations (not illustrated). In response-locked ERPs, no important topographic distinction appeared between the circumstances.

The spatio-temporal segmentation on the mixed ERP grand averages and the becoming within the particular person ERPs was performed in the identical means as for single priming (Determine 2C). Once more, six completely different microstates have been discovered, accounting for 97.9% of the variance of the info (Determine 1C). Given the same distribution of maps, the identical becoming durations as for single phrase priming have been used. When evaluating the length of every map per situation (Desk 4), important variations have been discovered on map 1 (F(2,46) = 5.305, p = 0.008) and map 5 (F(2,46) = 10.831, p < 0.001). Extra exactly, map 1 was shorter within the ASS situation as in comparison with the 2 different circumstances (ASS vs. UNR: p = 0.002; ASS vs. CAT: p = 0.05), with out length distinction between UNR and CAT (p = 0.25). As for map 5, it was considerably shorter in semantic-high circumstances as in comparison with the semantic-low situation (UNR vs. ASS: p < 0.001; UNR vs. CAT: p = 0.008), with out important distinction between ASS and CAT (p = 0.07). For each maps, convergent outcomes have been discovered on the GEV, which different considerably throughout circumstances for map 1 (F(2,46) = 13.538, p < 0.001) and map 5 (F(2,46) = 10.603). On map 1, the GEV was decrease within the ASS situation as in comparison with the UNR (p < 0.001) and CAT (p < 0.001) circumstances, with no distinction between UNR and CAT (p = 0.24). On map 5, the GEV within the semantic-high circumstances was decrease than within the UNR situation (UNR vs. ASS: p < 0.001; UNR vs. CAT: p = 0.006), however no distinction appeared between ASS and CAT (p = 0.09).

www.frontiersin.org

Desk 4. Imply length (in ms) and International Defined Variance (GEV, in %) of the six microstates in every situation for double phrase priming based on the becoming process within the particular person ERPs.

Dialogue

Utilizing a PWIP with a somewhat lengthy destructive SOA, we noticed that image naming was sped up with associative and categorical primes, as in comparison with unrelated primes. A lengthened SOA was ample to beat the interfering impact that was noticed within the preliminary experiment at a SOA of −66 ms. Curiously, associative primes accelerated the speech planning course of greater than categorical primes did. That is in step with earlier studies exhibiting that thematic/associative relations induce much less lexical competitors than categorical ones (e.g., Costa et al., 2005). When the prime and the goal belong to the identical class (e.g., penguin-eagle), additionally they share a number of semantic options, resulting in the activation of a number of ideas spreading to a number of lexical entries competing for choice. However when the prime and the goal are related (e.g., penguin-ice), much less semantic options are shared and lexical competitors is weaker (Abdel Rahman and Melinger, 2009) or absent (de Zubicaray et al., 2014), as in comparison with the specific situation. As well as, image naming was additionally quicker with a double priming as in comparison with a single priming within the ASS and CAT circumstances. In the identical means as in semantic interference (Abdel Rahman and Melinger, 2008), we offer right here the primary remark that a number of primes can improve semantic facilitation results. Nevertheless, opposite to interference results, the current end result can hardly be defined by elevated lexical competitors. Within the subsequent sections, we are going to talk about the time-windows of the semantic facilitation results and the way they contribute to the understanding of the processes underlying speech manufacturing.

Time-Home windows of Semantic Facilitation

When evaluating semantic-high circumstances (ASS, CAT) with the semantic-low situation (UNR), ERP analyses confirmed constant amplitude modulations in comparatively late time-windows in stimulus-locked ERPs, i.e., past 330 ms publish image onset in single priming and past 275 ms in double priming, with bigger amplitudes for ASS and CAT relative to UNR. Regardless of a 50 ms shift within the onset of ERP results between single and double priming, each fall past the P2/N2 part which has been beforehand related to the onset of lexical choice. This shift may due to this fact solely mirror the general pace distinction (imply RT for single priming: 708 ms and for double priming: 686 ms). This late locus is confirmed by the spatio-temporal segmentation analyses: length variations appeared systematically on the microstate beginning round 300 ms publish image onset (map 5 in Figures 1C, 2C), which was shorter in semantic-high circumstances. Subsequently, the noticed ERP outcomes probably correspond to shorter length of comparable psychological processes for the primed circumstances in a time-window falling after lexical choice.

In double priming, ERP amplitude modulations between the UNR and ASS circumstances started already within the clean interval between the phrases and the image, with bigger amplitudes for UNR relative to ASS. These outcomes converge with these from the ERP spatio-temporal analyses, during which the primary microstate (map 1 in Determine 2C) is shorter within the ASS situation than within the different circumstances. The pre-picture ERP results may very well be as a result of an integration of the hyperlink between the 2 associative primes resulting in lexical preactivation/anticipation (Dikker and Pylkkänen, 2013). Curiously, no early/pre-picture amplitude modulation was discovered when evaluating UNR and CAT circumstances, whereas ASS vs. CAT divergences additionally confirmed up across the image onset. Certainly, with two ASS primes (e.g., flight, sky), the goal (e.g., airplane) that underwent familiarization was fairly predictable, whereas after two CAT primes (e.g., helicopter, bus), solely the semantic class may very well be anticipated and the goal remained much less predictable. Some topics might have tried to use a method, i.e., guessing or anticipating every naming response throughout or shortly after the presentation of the associative primes. Even when this might partly account for the noticed facilitation, we don’t imagine that our outcomes are solely as a result of pure guessing for the next causes. First, semantic facilitation has been reported even with quick destructive SOAs (Alario et al., 2000; Damian and Abdel Rahman, 2003; Finkbeiner and Caramazza, 2006; Bölte et al., 2013; Damian and Spalek, 2014) and isn’t proportional to the destructive SOA length (i.e., the quantity of facilitation is similar at −1000 ms and −400 ms SOAs; Zhang et al., 2016). Second, clearly anticipated responses (and their corresponding ERPs) have been probably eradicated by cleansing the response instances with a cut-off set at three normal deviations for every topic’s imply. Third, the late ERP results of situation after two associative primes have been distributed on the same cluster of central electrodes than after one associative prime (Figures 1A, 2A).

Because the longer destructive SOA in double priming vs. single priming may simply as properly clarify the larger facilitation that we reported right here, we can not draw conclusions concerning the nature of the cumulative impact of a number of primes. It may very well be as a result of strategic anticipation (i.e., the topics know that after having seen two phrases the image will seem, whereas after the primary phrase, it may be one other phrase or the image) and/or from the combination of each phrases in relation to the goal image/idea to call. Word that after two categorical primes, the amplitude variations concern first a cluster of anterior electrodes after which central electrodes, which is also—to some extent—indicative of partial anticipation in presence of two primes. Subsequently, we is not going to extrapolate in evaluating immediately single to double priming, however somewhat deal with the impact of the varieties of primes.

Underlying Processes of Semantic Facilitation

ERP outcomes throughout semantic relatedness (ASS/CAT) confirmed results in the identical comparatively late time-window (P3/N3 elements), on the identical clusters of central electrodes and on identical durations of secure electrophysiological sample at scalp. This convergence of ERP results may recommend that within the PWIP, a minimum of with an extended destructive SOA, completely different semantic relationships between the prime and the goal (e.g., coordinate vs. affiliate) can each facilitate speech manufacturing in related methods. Furthermore, plainly the 2 varieties of primes exerted an affect on the identical speech planning course of within the current experiment.

Crucially, the time-window modulated by the semantic manipulation in our experiment fell past the P2/N2 part, which has been associated to the onset of lexical choice (Maess et al., 2002; Costa et al., 2009; Strijkers et al., 2010; Aristei et al., 2011). Such late results of semantic primes within the PWIP have been beforehand reported by different ERP research (Dell’Acqua et al., 2010; Blackford et al., 2012; Shitova et al., 2016), though these research used solely coordinates and noticed behavioral interference. Shitova et al. (2016) located the impact on the word-planning stage, and the 2 different research (Dell’Acqua et al., 2010; Blackford et al., 2012) offered barely extra particular interpretations and associated this late impact to the activation of the phonological word-form of the image’s identify. Certainly, post-lexical processes are very probably engaged after 275 ms: this time-window has been related in earlier ERP research to phonological processes (Vihla et al., 2006), impaired phonological encoding (Laganaro et al., 2009, 2011) and differed between phonological and orthographical phrase type encoding in image naming (Perret and Laganaro, 2012). Critically, “post-lexical” doesn’t essentially imply phonological or phonetic. It has additionally been proven that different variables like phrase age of acquisition, identify settlement and picture settlement modulate ERPs in late time-windows related to post-lexical processes (Valente et al., 2014), which is in step with monitoring happening in parallel to phrase type encoding.

This leaves us with two doable accounts for post-lexical results: modulations on the word-form stage or/and monitoring results. The self-monitoring inside loop, engaged as quickly as the primary phase of the phonological phrase is encoded (Indefrey and Levelt, 2004), may need been extra environment friendly within the semantic-high circumstances than within the unrelated situation. Semantic primes might have lowered the assets wanted by the monitoring for the phonological preparation. Such a predominant position of self-monitoring within the PWIP is supported by the research of Dhooge and Hartsuiker (2012). In line with these authors, solely the implication of verbal self-monitoring can account for the polarity reversal of the consequences noticed within the PWIP. Curiously, the PWIP research of Dell’Acqua et al. (2010) confirmed concomitant ERP results for reverse behavioral results (phonological facilitation and semantic interference) round 320 ms publish image onset, thus each appropriate with the self-monitoring interpretation.

Lastly, strategic processes presumably arising post-lexically may additionally partly clarify the current “late” ERP results: it’s doable that individuals adopted anticipatory methods induced by the lengthy destructive SOA to foretell some naming responses in semantic-high circumstances (Alario, 2001). Even when anticipating a response by way of predictions appears very pure in on a regular basis dialogs (Corps et al., 2018) and in sentence completion (Piai et al., 2014b), we can not affirm straightforwardly that such anticipatory methods have influenced the (post-lexical) time-course of speech planning and/or the self-monitoring within the current experiments. In language comprehension, prediction and anticipation already drawed the eye of psycholinguists (e.g., Brothers et al., 2015; Luke and Christianson, 2016), however in language manufacturing strategic features stay under-investigated till now and the extent at which predictions are specified remains to be debated (Drake and Corley, 2015).

In sum, this text demonstrates that semantic facilitation is as appropriate as semantic interference to tell on the phrase manufacturing course of. It offers the primary empirical proof that specific and associative facilitation share the identical locus, a minimum of within the context of the PWIP with a comparatively lengthy destructive SOA. It additionally studies the primary remark that a number of primes can improve semantic facilitation. The current information recommend that semantic facilitation results induced by each ASS and CAT primes come up at post-lexical processing phases, with out discarding the involvement of strategic processes. This interpretation is in step with Starreveld and La Heij (2017) not too long ago warranting that Stroop and PWIP each have a “late” locus. By post-lexical, we refer both to phonological processes interacting with (pre-)lexical processes (e.g., semantic integration of the prime with the goal throughout phonological encoding), or to the implication of the verbal self-monitoring. These inferences don’t appear to be restricted to the PWIP, as we not too long ago recognized ERP facilitation results additionally occurring after the P2 part within the first cycle of the blocked cyclic naming paradigm (Python et al., 2018). If we keep on with precise estimates for image naming RT within the 600 ms vary (Indefrey, 2011), all results noticed after 275 ms publish image onset are presumably post-lexical. Nonetheless, with imply naming latencies of 700 ms ± 150 ms, the talk stays open concerning the sufficient means of rescaling the precise estimates to numerous naming latencies (Laganaro, 2016; Roelofs and Shitova, 2017). Future analysis is required to raised take note of the RT variability within the ERP evaluation and determine not solely serial phases of speech planing however contemplate the processes in an interactive means.

Knowledge Availability Assertion

The listing of stimuli is included within the supplementary file.

Writer Contributions

GP and ML: research conception and design. GP and RF: acquisition of information. GP, RF and ML: evaluation and interpretation of information. GP: drafting of manuscript. RF and ML: important revision.

Funding

This analysis was supported by Swiss Nationwide Science Basis Grant No. 105319_146113.

Battle of Curiosity Assertion

The authors declare that the analysis was performed within the absence of any business or monetary relationships that may very well be construed as a possible battle of curiosity.

Footnotes

  1. Psychology Software program Instruments, Inc. [E-Prime 2.0]. Retrieved from http://www.pstnet.com/

Supplementary Materials

The Supplementary Materials for this text may be discovered on-line at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00136/full#supplementary-material

References

Abdel Rahman, R., and Melinger, A. (2008). Enhanced phonological facilitation and traces of concurrent phrase type activation in speech manufacturing: an object-naming research with a number of distractors. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 61, 1410–1440. doi: 10.1080/17470210701560724

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Abdel Rahman, R., and Melinger, A. (2009). Semantic context results in language manufacturing: a swinging lexical community proposal and a overview. Lang. Cogn. Course of. 24, 713–734. doi: 10.1080/01690960802597250

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Alario, F.-X., and Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 photos standardized for French: norms for identify settlement, picture settlement, familiarity, visible complexity, picture variability, and age of acquisition. Behav. Res. Strategies Instrum. Comput. 31, 531–552. doi: 10.3758/bf03200732

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Aristei, S., Melinger, A., and Abdel Rahman, R. (2011). Electrophysiological chronometry of semantic context results in language manufacturing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 1567–1586. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21474

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., and Bates, D. M. (2008). Blended-effects modeling with crossed random results for topics and objects. J. Mem. Lang. 59, 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Blackford, T., Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J., and Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). A humorous factor occurred on the best way to articulation: N400 attenuation regardless of behavioral interference in image naming. Cognition 123, 84–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.007

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Bloem, I., van den Boogaard, S., and La Heij, W. (2004). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language manufacturing: additional proof for the conceptual choice mannequin of lexical entry. J. Mem. Lang. 51, 307–323. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.001

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Bölte, J., Dohmes, P., and Zwitserlood, P. (2013). Interference and facilitation in spoken phrase manufacturing: results of morphologically and semantically associated context stimuli on image naming. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 42, 255–280. doi: 10.1007/s10936-012-9219-1

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Bonin, P., Peereman, R., Malardier, N., Méot, A., and Chalard, M. (2003). A brand new set of 299 photos for psycholinguistic research: french norms for identify settlement, picture settlement, conceptual familiarity, visible complexity, picture variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behav. Res. Strategies Instrum. Comput. 35, 158–167. doi: 10.3758/bf03195507

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Brothers, T., Swaab, T. Y., and Traxler, M. J. (2015). Results of prediction and contextual assist on lexical processing: prediction takes priority. Cognition 136, 135–149. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.017

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Bueno, S., and Megherbi, H. (2009). French categorization norms for 70 semantic classes and comparability with Van Overschelde et al.’s (2004) English norms. Behav. Res. Strategies 41, 1018–1028. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1018

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Chen, Q., and Mirman, D. (2012). Competitors and cooperation amongst related representations: towards a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory results of lexical neighbors. Psychol. Rev. 119, 417–430. doi: 10.1037/a0027175

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Collina, S., Tabossi, P., and De Simone, F. (2013). Phrase manufacturing and the picture-word interference paradigm: the position of studying. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 42, 461–473. doi: 10.1007/s10936-012-9229-z

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Collins, A. M., and Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation concept of semantic processing. Psychol. Rev. 82, 407–428. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.82.6.407

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Corps, R. E., Gambi, C., and Pickering, M. J. (2018). Coordinating utterances throughout turn-taking: the position of prediction, response preparation, and articulation. Discourse Course of. 55, 230–240. doi: 10.1080/0163853x.2017.1330031

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Costa, A., Alario, F. X., and Caramazza, A. (2005). On the specific nature of the semantic interference impact within the picture-word interference paradigm. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12, 125–131. doi: 10.3758/bf03196357

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Costa, A., Mahon, B., Savova, V., and Caramazza, A. (2003). Stage of categorisation impact: a novel impact within the picture-word interference paradigm. Lang. Cogn. Course of. 18, 205–234. doi: 10.1080/01690960143000524

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Costa, A., Strijkers, Ok., Martin, C., and Thierry, G. (2009). The time course of phrase retrieval revealed by event-related mind potentials throughout overt speech. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 106, 21442–21446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908921106

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Damian, M. F., and Spalek, Ok. (2014). Processing completely different sorts of semantic relations in picture-word interference with non-masked and masked distractors. Entrance. Psychol. 5:1183. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01183

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

de Zubicaray, G. I., Hansen, S., and McMahon, Ok. L. (2013). Differential processing of thematic and categorical conceptual relations in spoken phrase manufacturing. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142, 131–142. doi: 10.1037/a0028717

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

de Zubicaray, G., Johnson, Ok., Howard, D., and McMahon, Ok. (2014). A perfusion fMRI investigation of thematic and categorical context results within the spoken manufacturing of object names. Cortex 54, 135–149. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.018

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Dell, G. S., and O’Seaghdha, P. G. (1991). Mediated and convergent lexical priming in language manufacturing: a touch upon Levelt et al. (1991). Psychol. Rev. 98, 604–614; dialogue 615–618. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.98.4.604

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Dell’Acqua, R., Sessa, P., Peressotti, F., Mulatti, C., Navarrete, E., and Grainger, J. (2010). ERP proof for ultra-fast semantic processing within the picture-word interference paradigm. Entrance. Psychol. 1:177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00177

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Dhooge, E., and Hartsuiker, R. J. (2012). Lexical choice and verbal self-monitoring: results of lexicality, context, and time stress in picture-word interference. J. Mem. Lang. 66, 163–176. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.08.004

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Drake, E., and Corley, M. (2015). Results in manufacturing of phrase pre-activation throughout listening: are listener-generated predictions specified at a speech-sound stage? Mem. Cognit. 43, 111–120. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0451-9

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Ferrand, L., and Alario, F.-X. (1998). Normes d’associations verbales pour 366 noms d’objets concrets. Année Psychol. 98, 659–709. doi: 10.3406/psy.1998.28564

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Finkbeiner, M., and Caramazza, A. (2006). Now you see it, now you don’t: on turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like activity. Cortex 42, 790–796. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70419-2

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Francis, W. S. (2014). Repetition priming in image naming: sustained studying via the rushing of a number of processes. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 21, 1301–1308. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0610-9

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Ganushchak, L. Y., and Schiller, N. O. (2008). Motivation and semantic context have an effect on mind error-monitoring exercise: an event-related mind potentials research. Neuroimage 39, 395–405. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.001

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Griffin, Z. M., and Bock, Ok. (1998). Constraint, phrase frequency, and the connection between lexical processing ranges in spoken phrase manufacturing. J. Mem. Lang. 38, 313–338. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2547

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Hantsch, A., Jescheniak, J. D., and Mädebach, A. (2012). Naming and categorizing objects: activity variations modulate the polarity of semantic results within the picture-word interference paradigm. Mem. Cognit. 40, 760–768. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0184-6

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Hantsch, A., Jescheniak, J. D., and Schriefers, H. (2005). Semantic competitors between hierarchically associated phrases throughout speech planning. Mem. Cognit. 33, 984–1000. doi: 10.3758/bf03193207

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Hantsch, A., Jescheniak, J. D., and Schriefers, H. (2009). Distractor modality can flip semantic interference into semantic facilitation within the picture-word interference activity: implications for theories of lexical entry in speech manufacturing. J. Exp. Psychol. Study. Mem. Cogn. 35, 1443–1453. doi: 10.1037/a0017020

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Hirschfeld, G., Jansma, B., Bölte, J., and Zwitserlood, P. (2008). Interference and facilitation in overt speech manufacturing investigated with event-related potentials. Neuroreport 19, 1227–1230. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328309ecd1

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Howard, D., Nickels, L., Coltheart, M., and Cole-Advantage, J. (2006). Cumulative semantic inhibition in image naming: experimental and computational research. Cognition 100, 464–482. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.006

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Hutson, J., and Damian, M. F. (2014). Semantic gradients in picture-word interference duties: is the scale of interference results affected by the diploma of semantic overlap? Entrance. Psychol. 5:872. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00872

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical information evaluation: away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and in the direction of logit blended fashions. J. Mem. Lang. 59, 434–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Janssen, N., Schirm, W., Mahon, B. Z., and Caramazza, A. (2008). Semantic interference in a delayed naming activity: proof for the response exclusion speculation. J. Exp. Psychol. Study. Mem. Cogn. 34, 249–256. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.249

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Koenig, T., Kottlow, M., Stein, M., and Melie-García, L. (2011). Ragu: a free instrument for the evaluation of EEG and MEG event-related scalp area information utilizing world randomization statistics. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011:938925. doi: 10.1155/2011/938925

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Koenig, T., and Melie-García, L. (2010). A way to find out the presence of averaged event-related fields utilizing randomization assessments. Mind Topogr. 23, 233–242. doi: 10.1007/s10548-010-0142-1

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Kuipers, J.-R., and La Heij, W. (2008). Semantic facilitation in class and motion naming: testing the message-congruency account. J. Mem. Lang. 58, 123–139. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.005

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Kuipers, J.-R., La Heij, W., and Costa, A. (2006). An additional take a look at semantic context results in language manufacturing: the position of response congruency. Lang. Cogn. Course of. 21, 892–919. doi: 10.1080/016909600824211

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

La Heij, W., and van den Hof, E. (1995). Image-word interference will increase with target-set dimension. Psychol. Res. 58, 119–133. doi: 10.1007/bf00571100

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Laganaro, M. (2016). Dynamics of phrase manufacturing and processing pace. Lang. Cogn. Neurosci. 31, 463–464. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1096402

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Laganaro, M., Morand, S., Michel, C. M., Spinelli, L., and Schnider, A. (2011). ERP correlates of phrase manufacturing earlier than and after stroke in an aphasic affected person. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 374–381. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21412

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Laganaro, M., Morand, S., Schwitter, V., Zimmermann, C., Camen, C., and Schnider, A. (2009). Electrophysiological correlates of various anomic patterns as compared with regular phrase manufacturing. Cortex 45, 697–707. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.09.007

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., and Meyer, A. S. (1999). A concept of lexical entry in speech manufacturing. Behav. Mind Sci. 22, 1–38; dialogue 38–75. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99001776

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competitors within the picture-word interference activity. Mem. Cognit. 7, 485–495. doi: 10.3758/bf03198265

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Maess, B., Friederici, A. D., Damian, M. F., Meyer, A. S., and Levelt, W. J. M. (2002). Semantic class interference in overt image naming: sharpening present density localization by PCA. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14, 455–462. doi: 10.1162/089892902317361967

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, Ok. A., and Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical choice isn’t by competitors: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation results within the picture-word interference paradigm. J. Exp. Psychol. Study. Mem. Cogn. 33, 503–535. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Melinger, A., and Abdel Rahman, R. (2013). Lexical choice is aggressive: proof from not directly activated semantic associates throughout image naming. J. Exp. Psychol. Study. Mem. Cogn. 39, 348–364. doi: 10.1037/a0028941

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Navarrete, E., Del Prato, P., Peressotti, F., and Mahon, B. Z. (2014). Lexical choice isn’t by competitors: proof from the blocked naming paradigm. J. Mem. Lang. 76, 253–272. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.05.003

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., and Schoffelen, J.-M. (2011). FieldTrip: open supply software program for superior evaluation of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological information. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011:156869. doi: 10.1155/2011/156869

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Oostenveld, R., and Praamstra, P. (2001). The 5 p.c electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112, 713–719. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00527-7

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Oppenheim, G. M., Dell, G. S., and Schwartz, M. F. (2010). The darkish facet of incremental studying: a mannequin of cumulative semantic interference throughout lexical entry in speech manufacturing. Cognition 114, 227–252. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Pascual-Marqui, R. D., Michel, C. M., and Lehmann, D. (1995). Segmentation of mind electrical exercise into microstates: mannequin estimation and validation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 42, 658–665. doi: 10.1109/10.391164

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Perret, C., and Laganaro, M. (2012). Comparability of electrophysiological correlates of writing and talking: a topographic ERP evaluation. Mind Topogr. 25, 64–72. doi: 10.1007/s10548-011-0200-3

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Perrin, F., Bertrand, O., and Pernier, J. (1987). Scalp present density mapping: worth and estimation from potential information. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 34, 283–288. doi: 10.1109/TBME.1987.326089

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Piai, V., Roelofs, A., Jensen, O., Schoffelen, J.-M., and Bonnefond, M. (2014a). Distinct patterns of mind exercise characterise lexical activation and competitors in spoken phrase manufacturing. PLoS One 9:e88674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088674

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Piai, V., Roelofs, A., and Maris, E. (2014b). Oscillatory mind responses in spoken phrase manufacturing mirror lexical frequency and sentential constraint. Neuropsychologia 53, 146–156. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.014

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Piai, V., Roelofs, A., Rommers, J., and Maris, E. (2015). β oscillations mirror reminiscence and motor features of spoken phrase manufacturing: β Oscillations in Phrase Manufacturing. Hum. Mind Mapp. 36, 2767–2780. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22806

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Piai, V., Roelofs, A., and van der Meij, R. (2012). Occasion-related potentials and oscillatory mind responses related to semantic and Stroop-like interference results in overt naming. Mind Res. 1450, 87–101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.050

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Protopapas, A. (2007). Examine Vocal: a program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behav. Res. Strategies 39, 859–862. doi: 10.3758/bf03192979

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Python, G., Fargier, R., and Laganaro, M. (2018). ERP proof of distinct processes underlying semantic facilitation and interference in phrase manufacturing. Cortex 99, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.008

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

R Improvement Core Staff. (2003). R: A Language and Setting for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Basis for Statistical Computing.

Roelofs, A. (2006). Context results of images and phrases in naming objects, studying phrases, and producing easy phrases. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 59, 1764–1784. doi: 10.1080/17470210500416052

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Roelofs, A., and Shitova, N. (2017). Significance of response time in assessing the cerebral dynamics of spoken phrase manufacturing: touch upon Munding et al. (2016). Lang. Cogn. Neurosci. 32, 1064–1067. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1274415

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Rosinski, R. R., Golinkoff, R. M., and Kukish, Ok. S. (1975). Automated semantic processing in a picture-word interference activity. Youngster Dev. 46, 247–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1975.tb03301.x

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Sailor, Ok., and Brooks, P. J. (2014). Do part-whole relations produce facilitation within the picture-word interference activity? Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 67, 1768–1785. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.870589

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Sailor, Ok., Brooks, P. J., Bruening, P. R., Seiger-Gardner, L., and Guterman, M. (2009). Exploring the time course of semantic interference and associative priming within the picture-word interference activity. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 62, 789–801. doi: 10.1080/17470210802254383

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., and Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical entry in language manufacturing: picture-word interference research. J. Mem. Lang. 29, 86–102. doi: 10.1016/0749-596x(90)90011-n

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Shitova, N., Roelofs, A., Schriefers, H., Bastiaansen, M., and Schoffelen, J.-M. (2016). Utilizing mind potentials to functionally localise stroop-like results in color and film naming: perceptual encoding versus phrase planning. PLoS One 11:e0161052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161052

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Starreveld, P. A., and La Heij, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interplay in naming duties. J. Exp. Psychol. Study. Mem. Cogn. 21, 686–698. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.686

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Starreveld, P. A., and La Heij, W. (1996). Time-course evaluation of semantic and orthographic context results in image naming. J. Exp. Psychol. Study. Mem. Cogn. 22, 896–918. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.4.896

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Starreveld, P. A., and La Heij, W. (2017). Image-word interference is a Stroop impact: a theoretical evaluation and new empirical findings. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 24, 721–733. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1167-6

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Strijkers, Ok., Costa, A., and Thierry, G. (2010). Monitoring lexical entry in speech manufacturing: electrophysiological correlates of phrase frequency and cognate results. Cereb. Cortex 20, 912–928. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp153

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Valente, A., Bürki, A., and Laganaro, M. (2014). ERP correlates of phrase manufacturing predictors in image naming: a trial by trial a number of regression evaluation from stimulus onset to response. Entrance. Neurosci. 8:390. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00390

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Vihla, M., Laine, M., and Salmelin, R. (2006). Cortical dynamics of visible/semantic vs. phonological evaluation in image confrontation. Neuroimage 33, 732–738. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.040

PubMed Summary | CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Vitkovitch, M., and Tyrrell, L. (1999). The results of distractor phrases on naming photos on the subordinate stage. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 52, 905–926. doi: 10.1080/027249899390864

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Wong, A. W.-Ok., Chiu, H.-C., Wang, J., Cao, J., Wong, S.-S., and Chen, H.-C. (2017). An early locus of associative and categorical context results in speech manufacturing: proof from an ERP research utilizing the picture-word interference paradigm. Lang. Cogn. Neurosci. 32, 1305–1319. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2017.1355060

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Zhang, Q., Feng, C., Zhu, X., and Wang, C. (2016). Reworking semantic interference into facilitation in a picture-word interference activity. Appl. Psycholinguist. 37, 1025–1049. doi: 10.1017/s014271641500034x

CrossRef Full Textual content | Google Scholar

Adblock take a look at (Why?)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *